Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Юристы & Нейросети

@LegalMindAI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,995subscribers

+312 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002380789172
TypeChannel
Username@LegalMindAI
DescriptionКанал про ИИ в юридической практике и жизни юриста. Инструменты, анализ кейсов, актуальные новости и обмен опытом между юристами. Автор - Андрей Стуколов, адвокат и президент Санкт-Петербургской коллегии адвокатов Intelligence
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LegalMindAI

Growth

11,68311,99511,8396 August 2026 — 11,683 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,786 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,829 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,852 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,882 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,945 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,971 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,995 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,636–12,042 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:0711,995+24
12 Aug 2026, 04:2211,971+26
11 Aug 2026, 03:1211,945+63
10 Aug 2026, 04:1211,882+30
9 Aug 2026, 01:5111,852+23
8 Aug 2026, 00:0111,829+43
7 Aug 2026, 01:4511,786+103
6 Aug 2026, 05:5111,683first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 11,995 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,220
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 April 202610 August 2026)
Views total9,670
Reactions total269
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
9
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,826 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥71639.2%
👍56931.2%
28515.6%
👏452.46%
💯442.41%
🥰432.35%
❤‍🔥301.64%
🏆281.53%
🤝140.767%
🙏130.712%
💅100.548%
😁70.383%
👾60.329%
🤔30.164%
👀20.11%
👨‍💻20.11%
😇20.11%
10.055%
🆒10.055%
🌭10.055%
4 further kinds40.219%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,826reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,910 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎙️ Записал ролик про Словею В нем показал, как работает локальный транскрибатор аудио- и видеозаписей на русском языке: от загрузки файлов до готовой текстовой расшифровки с разбивкой по спикерам без отправки данных в облако. Также ответил на вопросы, которые появились после публикации программы: про скорость, качество распознавания, безопасность, ограничения диаризации и т.д. Смотреть здесь

🔥25👍1261👾1

3 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈3,760 views82 reactionsread 13 August 2026

*️⃣ Словея - программа под Windows для локальной транскрибации аудио и видеозаписей на русском языке. https://sloveya.ru/

🔥3920🙏13👏3😇2❤‍🔥1🏆1🤓1

3 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈4,000 views142 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как я собрал программу для локальной транскрибации аудиозаписей. Погружаюсь в вайбкодинг на максималках В октябре 2025 года в этом канале я писал о правовых рисках транскрибации аудиозаписей судебных заседаний через облачные иностранные ИИ-сервисы (например, AI Studio). Напомню, что загрузка такой записи в большинстве случаев – это трансграничная передача персональных данных с нарушением установленного законом поря

🔥67👍3719🏆10❤‍🔥6👏1👾1💘1

13 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC≈5,240 views48 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📚 Как реже упираться в лимиты Claude Недавно размещал гайд по этой теме - он вот здесь. А теперь записал еще видео. В нем объяснил все приемы из гайда и добавил новый способ, который в гайд не вошел - автозапуск пятичасового окна лимита ранним утром. Этот способ позволяет включить в рабочий день еще одно окно лимита и тем самым увеличить емкость подписки. Делюсь 🎙️📖

🔥19👍18🥰6👏21❤‍🔥1💅1

6 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC≈6,230 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎙️Завтра начинаем 5-й поток курса «Нейросети для юриста» Коллеги, короткое напоминание: завтра стартует новый поток онлайн-курса «Нейросети для юриста» в Институте адвокатуры Санкт-Петербурга. Формат: 6 онлайн-занятий по 4 часа, записи, материалы, библиотека промптов и закрытый чат участников. Для тех, кто хочет системно встроить нейросети в юридическую работу - программа и регистрация здесь. 📚 Если вы уже записа

👍14🔥138👏2❤‍🔥1🤝1

2 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC≈6,390 views96 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎙️ Завершился наш митап по Claude. Спасибо спикерам за полезные кейсы и интересные выступления, а всем участникам - за активность, вовлеченность и отличные вопросы ❤️

👍3819🔥18👏15🤝4❤‍🔥1🤔1

2 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC≈5,810 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🔥 Уже скоро. Сегодня в 13.00 (мск). Наш онлайн-митап по Claude. Запрыгнуть в последний вагон можно через бота по ссылке здесь

🔥119👍5❤‍🔥1👨‍💻1

29 Jun 2026, 17:18 UTC≈7,160 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎙️Митап «Claude в работе юриста» Коллеги, собрали программу нашего второго митапа на канале и уже совсем скоро он стартует. 02 июля (четверг), 13:00 – 16:00 (мск). Онлайн, бесплатно, по регистрации. Организация митапа: 🔵Андрей Стуколов - адвокат, президент Санкт-Петербургской коллегии адвокатов Интеллидженс, автор этого канала 🔵 Ярослав Бизяркин - разработчик ИИ-систем, специалист Центра ИИ СПбГУ, преподаватель

🔥29👍15🥰8❤‍🔥65👨‍💻1

25 Jun 2026, 08:56 UTC≈5,810 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026

И еще по митапу про Claude. Сбор заявок от спикеров продлеваю на сутки - до завтра. Первые заявки уже есть, но хочется сделать программу шире: обычный чат, Projects, Skills, Cowork, Claude Code, Design - и разные сценарии юридической работы. Если вы используете Claude в работе и готовы показать коллегам один конкретный кейс - самое время заявиться на митап в качестве спикера. Особенно ценны живые кейсы: что полу

🔥17👍9🏆5🥰54💅1

25 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,790 views78 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍32🔥30🥰84🏆3💅1

25 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,550 views100 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как реже упираться в лимиты при работе с Claude Одна из больных тем в Claude - лимиты. Особенно остро это чувствуется на базовой подписке за 20 долларов. 🚢 В преддверии нашего митапа по Claude подготовил гайд для юристов о том, как экономить токены при работе с Claude и реже упираться в ограничения. Да, советы из гайда не превратят Pro-подписку в Max, а Max - в полный безлимит. Но они помогут разумнее расходовать

👍54🔥35🥰62🏆2💅1

15 Jun 2026, 10:45 UTC≈6,270 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🔥 Открываем сбор заявок спикеров на митап по Claude Вижу много огней - значит, идея с митапом нашла поддержку. Поэтому запускаем сбор заявок от спикеров на наш второй митап. Митап #2: Claude в работе юриста 02 июля, 13:00 мск, онлайн Спикеры митапа - читатели канала, которые готовы поделиться с коллегами своим практическим опытом использования Claude в работе. Нужны не общие рассуждения про ИИ, а конкретные сцен

🔥36👍231🌭1🏆1💅1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LegalMindAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,519 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юристы & Нейросети” (@LegalMindAI), 11,995 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LegalMindAI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.