2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 15:45
59
no change
26 Aug 2026, 15:31
59
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
83
Videos
2
Links
38
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
189 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5352923276941230688
42
22.2%
custom 5274256587228211167
28
14.8%
custom 5341499634596478804
21
11.1%
custom 5328110868620133279
20
10.6%
custom 5353018895798140856
20
10.6%
custom 5208459397650464459
16
8.47%
👀
14
7.41%
custom 5386407477635998773
11
5.82%
custom 5386305244529446953
8
4.23%
custom 5386597328075378009
5
2.65%
custom 5298784196267890892
4
2.12%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LeeByeong_Gi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2026 to 3 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎀❤️ выслушал его молча. После очередного шага навстречу пришлось слегка, почти незаметно поднять голову. Собеседник был выше, и с сокращением расстояния между нами росло чувство дискомфорта. Однако интерес становился сильнее этого чувства...
❤️есколько секунд после этого я будто не решался произнести и слова, хотя на деле обдумывал все услышанное. Конечно, звучало подобное предложение даже заманчиво. Еще бы. Есл…
🔤❤️акая резкая смена эмоций привлекала внимание ещё больше; признаюсь, по коже прошли мурашки, хотя я давно привык к температуре данного помещения. Это уже не просто заинтересованность, а некое любопытство. Я крайне редко встречал людей, похожих на себя своей фальшью. Почему-то где-то внутри засело желание узнать что-то ещё, а не поскорее завершить диалог...
❤️ужчина сказал, что вместо слова "сотрудничество" он …
🌟❤️ризнаться честно, он меня немного заинтересовал. Конечно, многое в нем сильно раздражало. Начиная чрезмерной — а для меня предложения, содержащие в себе больше семи слов, уже считались большими — болтливостью и заканчивая явным желанием произвести впечатление. Однако, как говорится, рыбак рыбака видит издалека. Было в нём что-то... другое. Не как у других людей.
❤️та маска доброжелательности была видна мне с самог…
🎀❤️ стоял в ожидании уже мучительно долгие несколько минут. Почему-то коллеги, если этих безнадёг можно таковыми назвать, задерживались без предупреждения. К моему удивлению, за прилавком тоже никого не было. Это слегка настораживало. Вокруг ни души...
❤️ подобной атмосфере я давно привык. Она уже казалась какой-то... по-своему родной. Именно здесь мне доводилось проводить немаленькую криминальную часть своей жи…
👤: Хотелось бы узнать ваши предположения. Кто может быть этим таинственным незнакомцем? Помните: это может быть кто угодно, абсолютно любой человек, даже если он не в моих коннектах... Можете написать свои варианты под этим постом, мне было бы интересно узнать ваше мнение.
Ҁѳϯⱀƴđʜџӌєҁϯʙѳ¿ Ҁѳᵻоӡ.
Не люблю работу в команде. Обычно это выматывает.
❤️ сожалению, я трансплантолог и в области кардио, а на подобного рода операциях невозможно без дополнительных рук. Меня может откровенно вывести из себя работа параллельно с несколькими людьми, даже если внешне по мне и не скажешь.
❤️ не могу сосредоточиться, если ответственность лежит не только на мне. Мне приходится контролировать всю …
Добрый день.
Не подумайте, что я становлюсь добрее. Этому не бывать.
❤️егодня восьмое марта. Международный женский день... Раньше не принято было считать его таким же праздником, как Новый год, к примеру. Не было такого большого внимания к нему. Парни могли подарить цветок маме или девушке, которая им нравилась, а большего и не требовалось. К слову, нередко эти цветы они воровали с чьих-либо клумб, за что им сил…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @LeeByeong_Gi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 3 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Полурест | 𝕷𝖊𝖊 ᗾɣẾÕℕᶃ-₲ł ”𝟏𝟏𝟏”” (@LeeByeong_Gi), 59 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeeByeong_Gi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
