Channel
@LIONMediaTelegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002373115312 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LIONMediaTelegram |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LIONMediaTelegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 23 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 23 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 4 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$jims Winn once again caught partial liquidation. The new liquidation price of his position on $ ETH is $ 4361 Twitter traders are already joking that the strategy to “trade against Winn” works flawlessly - he stably opens the longs at the peaks and catches the liquidation with each market rollback. Recently, he also lost $ 308k in Long positions on ETH, also in August was liquidated in the amount of $ 297K and al…
❤1
💎 Co -#Ton coin on | 4h | TF Over the past 12 hours, the asset shows a decrease with a gradual update of previous minimums. 🔽 Alternative to reduction: The return and breakdown of the support level of $ 3.13 will talk about the resumption of sellers pressure, after which the zone of support for $ 3.07 - $ 3.09 will be the closest goal, the loss of which may lower the price to a strong minimum last week $ 3.018 🔼 W…
☝️Darmp in one day on a cryptocurrency earned more than in my life on real estate, writes The Wall Street Journal. The state of the US President’s family increased by more than $ 5 billion in one day thanks to the WLFI cryptocurrency they have produced. The amount exceeded the value of the entire real estate owned by Trump. ☝️ Why fight the pyramid, if you can create your own? $
Briefly about asset #wif Now the price is traded in the region of $ 0.8054, continuing to be under pressure after a decrease from the zone $ 1.1760 $. The graph shows that the asset is consolidated near the key support of $ 0.8000. 🕯 In the near future, an important level is the zone 0.8000 $ - $ 0.7300. If buyers hold the lower border and the asset extends up, you can expect growth for $ 0.9500, then - a potenti…
➡️ Coal on the #strk coin on | 4h | TF Over the past 10 hours, the asset traded in a narrow side range, demonstrating signs of consolidation, the volumes of trading remained moderate, which indicates the lack of strong pressure from buyers or sellers. ⬆️ Recovery and growth: A breakthrough above the $ 0.1240 resistance level with related volumes growth can open the way to the resistance zone $ 0.1250 - $ 0.1260, af…
BTC outfills from exchanges remain stable. The graph shows that in the spring and summer of 2023 strong bursts were recorded - up to 200k+ BTC per day. Subsequently, throughout 2024, the outfills remained moderate, but regularly accompanied the price increase, especially when the bitcoin exit above $ 70,000. Now the dynamics of outfills are much calmer, which indicates a decrease in pressure from large players and …
It looks like a gype in Nazdak
We finish Tuesday Takek on SOL 😎🔥 ADA can also fix the part, all with the profit! ♥
HE WHO IS NOT COURAGEOUS ENOUGH TO TAKE RISKS WILL ACCOMPLISH NOTHING IN LIFE AS GAMES ARE ALL ABOUT TAKING RISKS Don't delay your time trying to figure out if our services worth investing your capital as you can see for yourself that we do give reviews of our Supreme VIP group signals and we give profit payouts proof of our participants who confidently trust us and many who did trade the signals do thank us for the…
A similar picture was in the third UP. It is possible that we can repeat it in the Third Branch. Well, respectively, the movement of the corner is more than to be more than that of the sublime. Price 3750 is 38% correction to the last movement. And 38% of the crypt usually always makes. I'll even get better. The cue ball makes 38-50%, and the altas do all 50-62%. So, what we expect at least 3750.
⚪️ On the air we carefully monitor the wedge. It is likely that we are in correction of the type of "plane". Which I designated on the graphic. Unlike a zigzag, the plane shows the power of the tool, because He is not allowed to adjust him very much. This may be due to the way out of the giant triangle. While we are testing a breakdown area from above. We follow the upper border, it may well be that with a breakdow…
According to the BTCUSDT forecast, the price did not go down to test support for $ 106,000, but reached the first surveillance level - $ 110,000. This movement confirms the interest of customers and can open the way for the next purpose in the region of $ 112,000.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @LIONMediaTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 817,282 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DIRK DIETRICH CRYPTO (FREE SIGNAL)” (@LIONMediaTelegram), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LIONMediaTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.