Channel
@LHCZLA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
56,582subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002490095383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LHCZLA |
| Description | 欢迎来到慕熙团队六合彩资料频道！ 这里只发布经过严格验证、准确率达到 70%以上 或 连续命中三期 的优质资料。 ✔️ 资料筛选流程： 1️⃣ 先在我们交流群发布资料连续验证至少3天以上； 2️⃣ 符合要求后，艾特群管理员查验中奖率； 3️⃣ 高质量资料将被收录并发布在本频道，供大家参考！ 📊 我们致力于为您提供最可靠的六合彩参考资料，帮助您提升中奖率，祝各位彩友财气冲天，钞票堆成山！ #六合彩 #新澳门六合彩 #六合彩内幕 #六合彩电报群 商务合作： @rrrqj |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LHCZLA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 56,582 | -18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 56,600 | +32 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 56,568 | +38 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 56,530 | -44 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 56,574 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 56,594 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 56,594 | first reading |
137 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 137 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 137 (7 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,583 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 23 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 87.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 137 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
果然又又美好的一天从快乐三分开始 新奥也是又又又又吃肉，一肖直接吃肉，可惜了没看1尾，不然就是三码吃肉了 你在犹豫，别人都在发财，大点干早点散，错过了一些出货的高光时刻，你只能拍大腿后悔，也不用说我天天发的迟，我一直也说了， 有效下注资料提前看，拒绝白嫖❌，这不比跟着外面的烟雾弹舒服？一份好的资料，一个好的开端，一路顺势，注册平台有效下注，联系阿七 @rrrqj 好料提前看，这么多期的回顾相信兄弟们也明白稳定性，慕熙团队才是你最坚强的后盾 在平台充值有效下注，每天提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
226 期 中奖回顾🔡 新奥平鼠 出货 🀄️ 三肖 马 🀄️ 三行 🀄️ 三头 🀄️ 无错七尾 🀄️ 兔龙蛇羊鸡 复试3/4/5连 中3连 🀄️ 波色 🀄️ 三头 🀄️ 香港 波色 🀄️ 正一道 特 🀄️ 阿七个人统计 🀄️ 阿七出版 一肖 马 🀄️ 平特 0.8尾 🀄️ 16码 🀄️ 参考 平特 8尾 🀄️ 参考 五不中 🀄️ 鬼料 平特 1尾 🀄️ 鬼料 平特 鸡 🀄️ 挑码统计 5粒 🀄️ 新奥平肖 鸡 出货 🀄️ 大围 出货 🀄️ 在平台充值下注合作，每天好料提前看到 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
新澳02,03,15,27,31,32,39,42,48,01,05,07,08,12,17,19,21,33,43,44,45,49
出货大围 01,03,04,05,08,12,13,15,16,17,20,24,25,27,28,29,32,36,37,39,40,41,44,48,49 在平台充值有效下注，每天好料提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
牛羊鸡马复式 3.4 连拉满再出 牛羊鸡马复式 3.4 连拉满再出 牛羊鸡马复式 3.4 连拉满再出
牛羊鸡复试二连三连出 二连4倍 三连9倍。 一人打500来。 9点15分停 拉满
平特一肖牛 平特二连，牛羊 出货 在平台充值有效下注，每天好料提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
盘前特 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 22, 23, 26, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 45, 46, 47, 48 在平台充值有效下注，每天好料提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
数据大围 出货 03 06 07 10 12 13 15 17 19 20 26 31 32 34 38 40 44 45 47 49 在平台充值有效下注，每天好料提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025
Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @LHCZLA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 597,382 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新澳门六合彩资料（文字版）” (@LHCZLA), 56,582 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LHCZLA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.