Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

新澳门六合彩【资料库】

@xamlh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56,627subscribers

+5,640 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002216829994
TypeChannel
Username@xamlh
Description六合彩交流群( @AMLHCA ) 新澳资料频道 @xamlh 需要资料或投诉建议反馈: @rrrqj ===== ===== ===== ===== #六合彩 #六合彩内幕 #六合彩电报群 免费分享新澳门各种资料,新澳门六合彩资料,自由讨论交,永不解散
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xamlh

Growth

50,89856,82053,8597 August 2026 — 50,987 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,820 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,713 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,675 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,627 subscribers56,6277 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net +5,640. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,010–57,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:4456,627-48
11 Aug 2026, 16:2156,675-38
10 Aug 2026, 18:1256,713-107
9 Aug 2026, 16:2556,820+5,922
8 Aug 2026, 17:3450,898-89
7 Aug 2026, 18:4550,987first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.068%
avg views ÷ 56,627 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.8
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held102 (7 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,956
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
82,200
Videos
201
Links
1,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

其他就不一一回顾了 果然美好的一天从快乐三分开始 新奥也是又又又又吃肉,四肖3码直接大中 你在犹豫,别人都在发财,大点干早点散,错过了一些出货的高光时刻,你只能拍大腿后悔,也不用说我天天发的迟,我一直也说了, 有效下注资料提前看,拒绝白嫖❌,这不比跟着外面的烟雾弹舒服?一份好的资料,一个好的开端,一路顺势,注册平台有效下注,联系阿七 @rrrqj 好料提前看,这么多期的回顾相信兄弟们也明白稳定性,慕熙团队才是你最坚强的后盾 在平台充值有效下注,每天提前看到 满足流水联系 @rrrqj 平台链接👇👇👇…… 🌏注册网址:🔤🔤🔤🔤 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀 😂😂😂😂 https://b.cc/register?code=a1367267025 😂😂😂😂 国内用 http://6888b.cc/register?code=a1367267025

1

Signed 阿七

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @xamlh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 590,928 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“新澳门六合彩【资料库】” (@xamlh), 56,627 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xamlh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.