Channel
@Krishnamurti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,153subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001071695432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Krishnamurti |
| Description | گزیدههایی از آثار جیدو کریشنامورتی به فارسی و انگلیسی ادمین: @PanevisAdmin صفحهٔ اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/krishnamurti.persian نقل مطالب با ذکر منبع بلامانع است. کانال محمدجعفر مصفا: @Mossaffadotcom نیکول لپرا: @NicoleLePera |
| Created | 14 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Krishnamurti |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 7,153 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 7,152 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 7,151 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,148 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 7,148 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (24 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,959 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Awareness implies observing the world as it is, to know the world, the trees, nature, the beauty and the ugliness, to be aware of your neighbour, what they are wearing, and also to be aware of what you are, inwardly. If you are so aware, you will see that there are a great many reactions – like and dislike, punishment and reward – in that awareness. Can you be aware without any choice, a choiceless awareness, just …
What is essential is to see that one is confused, that all activity, all action which springs from confusion, must also be confused. It is like a confused person seeking a leader– his leader must also be confused. So it is essential to see that one is confused and not try to escape from it, not try to find explanations for it, but be passively, choicelessly, aware. Then you will see quite a different action springs…
Any system, any method, that teaches you how to meditate is obviously false. One can see why, intellectually, logically, for if you practise something according to a method – however noble, however ancient, however modern, however popular – you are making yourself mechanical; you are doing something over and over again in order to achieve something. In meditation, the end is not different from the means. But the me…
طبیعت چه مهربان هستیم بهطور طبیعی؛ بهویژه وقتی از شهرها دوریم، در میان دشتها و روستاهای کوچک. جیدو کریشنامورتی @Krishnamurti
What is meditation, and why should one meditate? Is it natural? Like breathing, like seeing, like hearing, is it natural? And why have we made it so unnatural, taking postures, following systems of Buddhist meditation, Tibetan meditation, Christian meditation, Tantric meditation, and the meditations set by your favourite guru? Aren't all those really abnormal? Why should I take a certain position to meditate? Why s…
Systems imply repetition, practice, following a method. If you follow a method, a system, a practice, it becomes a routine. And when the mind becomes a mechanical thing, then you have conflict, then there is an escape through sex, or through other forms of activity. Therefore, at all costs, avoid any system of meditation, because a mechanical mind can never find out what truth is. The mechanical mind can become ver…
@PanevisAdmin
One of the results of fear is the acceptance of authority in human affairs. Authority is created by our desire to be right, to be secure, to be comfortable, to have no conscious conflicts or disturbances, but nothing which results from fear can help us to understand our problems, even though fear may take the form of respect and submission to the so-called wise. The wise wield no authority, and those in authority a…
ناشناسی ما میخواهیم مشهور شویم، به عنوان نویسنده، به عنوان شاعر، به عنوان نقاش، به عنوان سیاستمدار، به عنوان خواننده یا هر چه دوست دارید. چرا؟ چون ما به کاری که انجام میدهیم واقعاً عشق نداریم. اگر شما به آواز خواندن عشق بورزید، یا به نقاشی، یا به نوشتن شعر، اگر شما واقعاً آن را دوست داشته باشید... ...دغدغهای ندارید که مشهور باشید یا نباشید. اینکه بخواهیم مشهور باشیم، جلف، مبتذل و احمقانه است... هیچ معنایی ن…
"Speculation and imagination are a hindrance to truth. The mind that speculates can never know the beauty of what is; it is caught in the net of its own images and words. However far it may wander in its image making, it is still within the shadow of its own structure and can never see what is beyond itself. The sensitive mind is not an imaginative mind. The faculty to create pictures limits the mind; such a mind i…
امشب جلسهٔ دومِ خواندن و بررسی این کتاب است. علاقمندان به شرکت در این جمع به »مدیر ثبتنام جلسات« پیام دهند. @Krishnamurti
روشنفکر، هنرمند جیدو کریشنامورتی @Krishnamurti
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @Krishnamurti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 123,231 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jiddu Krishnamurti” (@Krishnamurti), 7,153 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Krishnamurti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.