Channel
@KladbisheSamoletov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001545978136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KladbisheSamoletov |
| Description | Всем привет! Я занимаюсь моушн графикой, монтажом, немного увлекаюсь 3Д, занимаюсь музыкой, делаю локализации логотипов и видеоряда. Будет приятно поделиться с вами моими работами. По работе - @GearRocks |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KladbisheSamoletov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 67 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 67 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,525 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 67.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| custom 5884325029126081591 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| custom 5861546030121618456 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5861896014121667949 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.47% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 3 сезон, 7 серия – "Шмалуглы" Роли дублировали: Колдун - Макс Манн Пим - Иван Шухин Чарли - Макс Манн Босс - Герман Каз Аллан - Иван Шухин Король Шмалуглов - Герман Каз Королева Шмалуглов - Денис Савинов Нил - Борис Рыбаков Массовка: Игорь Богатырёв, Данил Енотаев, Влад Тузаков, Денис Савинов, Роман Скурихин Техническая часть: Режиссура – Радомир Паладий Звукорежиссура – Влад Тузаков Перевод – Ульяна Ма…
❤2
Не знаю кому это будет интересно, но вот демка (которую я вряд ли закончу) кавера на песню Muse - Hush. В оригинале на втором куплете и бэк вокале стоит девушка а у меня карманной девушки, способной спеть кавер за "спасибо" нету, так что... Все парты исполнил я. Довольно паршивенькое сведение, не исполнил главный саунд-дизайнерских ход оригинала, хотя это было б довольно просто... Ну ладно. Короче пусть тут валяется,…
👍3❤🔥2
Posted without readable text
❤1
Люблю "Друзьяшек Улыбашек", абсолютный и концентрированный абсурд, я б сказал даже эссенция. Обожаю эклектичность в анимации, частично этим моя любовь к Удивительному Миру Гамбола, наверное и формировалась, но в Друзьяшках это возведино в абсолют и чуть чаще используется как комедийный инструмент. Короче, кому хотелось отдохнуть, поржать, всем советую, а у меня тут как раз получилось немного поработать над локализа…
❤3🔥2custom 58843250291260815911
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS42MHsQn/ Первый раз монтировал Reels. В целом довольно простая работа, откровенно сделанная на скорую руку, да и делал я это... Часа в 4 ночи? Кичиться тут, одним словом, нечем, но решил поделиться всё равно. Ещё попробовал сделать субтитры в DaVinci... Каждый заход в эту ebuchuyou программу делает меня всё ближе к вечному заточению в аду😨 (Ненавижу)
❤3
https://t.me/jfvoice/6229
❤1
Новое видео на переводческом канале! https://youtu.be/EGCW_JBYfwY Но... На необычную тему! Мне попалось презанимательное видео с канала Siliconversations касательно очень громкого, но занятного сравнения ИИ-шлака (AI-slop) и... Каннибализма, внезапно. Корректное ли сравнение? Едва ли. Однако автор поднимает ряд занимательных точек зрения и морально-этических вопросов использования "креативного" контента, сгенериро…
❤2❤🔥1🔥1
Ооочень интересный ролик, классное сравнение, тема и повествование, настоятельно рекомендую к просмотру, тем более он короткий. Ну и Артёмка, красавчик🍿
custom 58843250291260815911
😨
❤3
А хотя нет, знаете, забудьте, что я говорил про "неплохой растровый движок" и "хороший результат". Как всегда Адоб идут нахуй. Успокойся, Гир, ты платишь за самое оптимальное для твоей работы ПО, успокойся, оно явно стоит своих денег, да-да👀😨
custom 58615460301216184562custom 58618960141216679491
Ещё я очень-очень жду внедрение DLSS (именно класс SR и Ray Reconstruction) в рабочие софтины. Есть демка блендера с этой технологией и это просто нечто. Я когда тыкался, обомлел от скорости и качества. В целом процесс такой же как и в играх, только с Path Tracing (трассировка лучей с бОльшим количеством лучей и большим количеством отскоков по сцене, если кто либо не слышал) и затем шумоподавление за счёт нейросети (…
🔥2
Удивительно, что 2D софтина может в 3D выдавать столь неплохой результат (хоть и представленная сцена очень простая). Всё ещё отвратительный экспиренс в постановке 3D сцены и тем более освещения, процесс не оптимизирован для этих задач, но я надеюсь когда нибудь команда Adobe сделает какое нибудь отдельное, удобное окно для работы с 3D, которое будет связанно с основным таймлайном, ну и завезёт нормальную поддержку P…
❤3❤🔥1custom 58843250291260815911
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KladbisheSamoletov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 285,205 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кладбище Самолётов” (@KladbisheSamoletov), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KladbisheSamoletov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.