👀 Странная вещь: иногда самый интересный канал находишь не через поиск, а в случайной подборке, которую чуть не пролистал сегодня может быть именно такой случай ↓ ✧ Скидки дня Озон ВБ — ежедневные выгодные предложения, популярные товары и полезные находки ✧ Расклад про тебя — подсказки, разборы и интересные расклады для самопознания ✧ Регрессолог — работа с подсознанием, внутренними состояниями и глубинными запро…

Channel
Sophia Kensington
@KensingtonSophia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
367subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002187025575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KensingtonSophia |
| Created | 4 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KensingtonSophia |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 367 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 368 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 372 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 387 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 401 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 410 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 410 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 4 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
57 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 29.8% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 28.1% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 22.8% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 14.0% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KensingtonSophia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2025 to 2 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Друзья подписывайтесь - https://t.me/Solis_Lina
❤1
🎉 Розыгрыш завершен! 🎁 Призы разыграны: Xmas Stocking #18265 📊 Результаты: 👥 Всего участников: 37004 🎟️ Всего билетов: 69138 🏆 Выбрано победителей: 1 🎊 Поздравляем всех победителей! Проверьте свой инвентарь.
🐶🔥 Вы только посмотрите на эту NFT-милаху от самого #SnoopDogg! 🔥🐶 Хочешь, чтобы мы устроили розыгрыш этой красавицы? 🎁👀
🔥2
Posted without readable text
🔥9
💖 Хэй, мои любимки! 🌸 Я возвращаюсь в Telegram — снова буду радовать вас контентом! 💋🔥 Жду ваших реакций! 🚀 #TelegramChannel #BloggerLife #NewContent #BackAgain #StayTuned #LoveYouAll #FollowMe #Vibes
❤3
🎁 Запущен розыгрыш подарков! Детали: Подписаться: @kensingtonsophia, @solis_lina Дедлайн: 07.09.2025 19:59 UTC Призы: Xmas Stocking #18265 Участники теперь могут присоединиться к этому розыгрышу. Удачи!
❤3
💖 Хэй, мои любимки! 🌸 Я возвращаюсь в Telegram — снова буду радовать вас контентом! 💋🔥 Жду ваших реакций! 🚀 #TelegramChannel #BloggerLife #NewContent #BackAgain #StayTuned #LoveYouAll #FollowMe #Vibes
❤🔥17🥰7❤3🔥1
Лето — это не просто время года, это состояние души ☀️✨ #SummerVibes #HelloSummer #SunshineMood #VacationReady #BeachLife #WarmDays #HappySoul #NatureLover
❤6💯3🔥1🥰1
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @KensingtonSophia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Solis_Lina · 1,3622 posts𝐁𝐮𝐱𝐚𝐫𝐚|𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 ⚜
@BUXARAA_MUSIC · 6721 postНеобычные факты | RealSWorld🌍
@fakty_dnya_realsworld · 751 postЛучшие фильмы,чат о кино у нас🍿👀🎬🎥📽
@filmaaaas · 4491 postFind Face
@Findfacevk · 4511 postВедьмино радио | Аня Финогенова
@fino_code · 8821 postДизайн. Интерьеры. Ремонт
@Home_Guru · 8091 postКИНО TOP 🔝 трейлеры фильмы сериалы
@kino_top4i · 4391 post🎀 КРАСИВЫЕ ПРИЧЕСКИ 🎀
@krasiviepricheski · 6511 postСовет от Отца
@motivatornauspeh1 · 5121 postМотивация
@motivnata · 7131 postСторис (Instagram)
@natatyumen · 7331 postОТКРЫТКИ | С ДНЁМ РОЖДЕНИЯ | ПОЗДРАВЛЕНИЯ |КАРТИНКИ | РОЖДЕСТВО |
@pozdravyha_pozdravok · 5341 postИдеи для вязания крючком и спицами
@shlyapakryuchkom · 5261 post💫Оформление сторис💫
@storiesinstasvet · 7991 postНаталия
@teleg74 · 1,0111 postВкусно худей 🍎🍐🍏🥝🥬🥦🥑
@Vesna0607 · 8381 post😋ВКУСНЫЕ РЕЦЕПТЫ😋
@vkusnue_retseptupp · 6891 postЖенский AliExpress
@VvkIczdCjvvmoD5h · 5941 post💰ФРИЛАНСЕР В КЕПКЕ💰ИЗ НАЙМА В ТЕЛЕГРАМ💙
@zarabotokvtelegram_iraida · 4851 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@KensingtonSophia named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sophia Kensington” (@KensingtonSophia), 367 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KensingtonSophia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.