Channel
@Itskcontrol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,852subscribers
-835 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002961909761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Itskcontrol |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Itskcontrol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 1,852 | +77 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 1,775 | -127 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 1,902 | -706 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:23 | 2,608 | -79 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 2,687 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (1 September 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,066 |
| Reactions total | 893 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
893 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 321 | 35.9% | |
| 🤣 | 182 | 20.4% | |
| ❤ | 136 | 15.2% | |
| 😭 | 113 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 64 | 7.17% | |
| 🍌 | 45 | 5.04% | |
| 🥴 | 11 | 1.23% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 1.12% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 0.336% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.336% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.224% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.224% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.112% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 893 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ترک Slow It Down از ایت بوی کیپاپ وارد تاپ تن ایتوتز امریکا شد و فلیکس تونسته به اولین سولو ایدل نسل چهار تبدیل بشه که به این موفقیت میرسه اونم بدون بدون هیچ سولو دبیو رسمی یا پروموشن و حالا ملت میگن یونجون چه زود تموم شد اونم بعد ۶ ماه پروموشن و گاییدن دهن مردم با شیاف آلبوم و ورژن های مختلف بازم رکورد یه سینگل که سولو دبیو رسمی هم نیست رو نزد و ایمپکت واقعی ایت بوی اینه . _ @itskcontrol
🔥134❤4💋4🤣2🍓1🍾1💘1
آهیون دخملی خوشگل بیبیمانستر اومده جواب یه کامنتو توی ویورس بده و از ترنسلیت خودکار ویورس استفاده کرده که اونم به اشتباه نوشته من کاندوم های صورتی دوست دارم و آهیونم خیلی فان بهش ریکشن داده که بامزه بود . _ @itskcontrol
😭81💋2🍓1🍾1💘1
تیزر جیسو برای Click که 4 سپتامبر و تیزر لیسا برای Sawadika که 3 سپتامبر ریلیز میشه و حالا همه بشدت هایپن و دارن از جلوه های اموی هاشون صحبت میکنن و مشخصه قراره ریلیز های قوی ای باشن . _ @itskcontrol
🔥71❤11🍓1💘1
تفاوت آمار استریم اسپات بوی نکست دور بوی گروپ خیای نسل پنج با توایس گروه بیگ فور وایرال شده و نتیزنا میگن چطور ممکنه اینقدر فلاپ شی که یه نسل پنجی که حتی محبوبم نیست بتونه راحت تمومت کنه و مثل اینکه توایس دیگه خیلی وقته از بیگ فور خارج شده و جاشو به آرتیستای دیگه داده . _ @itskcontrol
🤣84😭17❤1👍1🥴1
بعد از کنسرتای اخیر استریکیدز که مجبور شدن بخاطر باران شدید اخرای اجرا روی اسکوتر بشینن ارمیا شید انداختن با استفاده از این مسئله و یه کوت استی وایرال شده که نوشته بود ” نوتیس ازینکه اون مست نبود موقع روندن اسکوتر “ . _ @itskcontrol
🔥115❤3😭3
وایرال شده از کپی های تواید گرل گروپ جدید هایب از نیوجینز و حالا مشخص شده هایب با مدیاپلی توی چندین مقاله اونا رو نکست نیوجینز و نیوجینز نسل جدید معرفی کرده و حالا کاربرا میگن ما کاری نداریم تواید تا دبیو کرد هایب شروع کرد به پروموتش با اسم نیوجینز ولی چرا همین لقب نیوجینز نسل پنج رو توی مقاله های دیگه به کورتیس نسبت داد حالا به تواید و این خنده داره هر بار که یکی از گروه هاش دبیو میکنه شروع میکنه به مدیاپلی با اسم ن…
❤54😭2
طبق گزارشهای یسری منابع دوالیپا , تیم ایمپالا و بتس قراره جزو لاین آپ کوچلای ۲۰۲۷ باشن همچنین منابع مطلع یه زمانی گفتن هایب به AEG شرکت کوچلا پیشنهاد ۵۰ درصد از سود کنسرت بتس رو داده بود در ازای تصمیم گیری درباره اینکه کدوم اکت های کیپاپ قراره در اینده توی کوچلا شرکت کنن و این تصمیم گیری ها به هایب واگذار بشه که حالا مردم خندشون گرفته و میگن معلوم نیست چقدر پول داده بتس شرکت کنه وقتی میخواسته هر چی ارتیست داره و ندا…
🤣96😭3❤1🥱1🥴1
آریانا توی کنسرت جدیدش به جای چکمه های چرمی که همیشه میپوشید چکمه های پشمی بلند پوشید چون مثل اینکه پاهاش زخم شده بود و حالا مردم نگرانن و میگن آریانا این مدت داره با خودش چیکار میکنه . _ @itskcontrol
👍63
مثل اینکه مشخص شده دیسپچ پول گرفته که چت لیک شده بین مهج و خانواده اعضای نیوجینز منتشر کنه و اون اکانتی که واسش این چت هارو فرستاده ناشناس بوده حالا هم بعد از تحقیقات متوجه شدن این چتا فیک بوده و پلیس گفت همچین مکالمه هایی اصلا وجود ندارن و حالا احتمال میدن هایب به دیسپچ پول داده باشه که اینا رو منتشر کرده و برای اینکه لو نره محتوای معامله رو با یه اکانت ناشناس فرستاده همچنین انگار حالا خانواده نیوجینز و مهج میتونن ش…
❤62😭4💋1💔1🔥1
این فنکم جیهیو و جونگیون توایس وایرال شده و دارن از جونگیون بخاطر رفتارش انتقاد میکنن و وانسام گفتن وا خب دوستن و این چیزا مشکلی نداره یه عدهم گفتن اینجور دوستا تو دنیای واقعی غیر قابل تحملن و ممکنه واقعا رابطشون اینجور باشه و جونگیون رفتار بدی داره . _ @itskcontrol
🍌45🥴9💋3😭3🥱1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Itskcontrol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kcontrol” (@Itskcontrol), 1,852 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Itskcontrol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.