Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KarmanovichDev

Channel

KarmanovichDev

@KarmanovichDev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

554subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002111566269
TypeChannel
Username@KarmanovichDev
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 18 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KarmanovichDev

Growth

554557555.521 August 2026 — 557 subscribers22 August 2026 — 557 subscribers6 September 2026 — 554 subscribers21 August 20266 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 554–557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 10:39554-3
22 Aug 2026, 04:59557no change
21 Aug 2026, 15:45557first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

369 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16544.7%
👍11330.6%
🔥5314.4%
custom 5397916757333654639205.42%
🤝102.71%
🤔71.90%
🤯10.271%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 5 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2024, 12:07 UTC≈1,580 views5 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Статья(хабр) Аргументы по умолчанию(Мысли вслух). live channel 📣 habr 👍 #mindflow

👍3🔥2

24 Sept 2024, 15:39 UTC≈1,620 views5 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Статья(хабр) Поговорим про тесты(ч.1) live channel 📣 habr 👍 #test

👍3🔥2

21 Sept 2024, 12:53 UTC≈1,520 views11 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Всем привет! Последнее время страшно не хватает времени⏳, чтобы выпускать качественный контент привычного объёма📃. Несмотря на это, я продолжаю изучать статьи, смотреть видео и читать книги👨🏻‍🎓. Поэтому я решил добавить второй канал куда бы я "складывал" понравившиеся мне книги, статьи и т. п.(Там открыты комментарии🗣). Также понимая, что даже если нет времени, то выпускать какой-то контент нужно, я решил провести

👍11

31 Aug 2024, 15:45 UTC≈1,630 views171 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Всем привет! Хочу написать статью(и) о том, как работает: 1. Синхронный 2. Асинхронный 3. Многопоточный 4. Мультипроцессорный код, и что вообще такое: 1. Конкурентность 2. Параллелизм 3. Реактивность 4. Многозадачность Нужно ваше мнение: ❤️ - Полностью за! 👍 - Лишним не будет 🤔 - Нейтрально

146👍17🤔6🤝2

24 Aug 2024, 10:47 UTC≈1,570 views7 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Статья(хабр) Тестирование с помощью pytest(ч.2) live channel 📣 habr 👍 #python #test #pytest

👍5🔥1🤯1

10 Aug 2024, 13:26 UTC≈2,570 views16 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Статья(хабр) Тестирование с помощью pytest(ч.1) live channel 📣 habr 👍 #python #test #pytest

🔥12👍31

5 Aug 2024, 16:26 UTC≈2,340 views11 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Я снова добавляю информации по одной из ранее добавленных статей! На этот раз, это вторая часть о таком паттерне, как строитель(builder) + директор(director)

👍101

2 Aug 2024, 04:36 UTC≈1,990 views8 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Предлагаю освежить в памяти первую часть самой первой статьи на канале про шаблонный метод. Также я добавил туда вторую часть☺️

🤝8

27 Jul 2024, 13:01 UTC≈1,570 views10 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Статья Паттерн(шаблон) проектирования - адаптер(adapter) live channel 📣 habr 👍 #python #pattern #gof

6👍4

20 Jul 2024, 12:39 UTC≈1,600 views11 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Poll

Дорогие подписчики, канал существует уже не один месяц, поэтому думаю, пора собрать с вас обратную связь и понять, что можно улучшить и чего не хватает🛠

  1. Всё хорошо!40%
  2. Мало информации(темы не раскрыты)7%
  3. Много информации(перебор/сложно)3%
  4. Редко выходит материал(знаю😅)32%
  5. Большие проблемы с орфографией4%
  6. Очень не хватает определённых тем7%
  7. Нужны доп. форматы(видео, стримы, чат, для обсуждения вопросов/проблем)24%
  8. Разбора боевых задач44%
  9. Советы/обсуждение книг/курсов и т. п.28%
  10. Другое...4%

The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥11

20 Jul 2024, 12:26 UTC≈1,310 views0 reactionsread 21 August 2026

А вот и вторая часть по теме: Виды связи между объектами в ООП - Агрегация и композиция (ассоциация)

16 Jul 2024, 05:49 UTC≈1,610 views6 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Статья В чём различия между абстрактными классами, интерфейсами и протоколами?(abstract class, interface, protocol) #python #oop #abstraction

👍31🔥1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KarmanovichDev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jul 2024, 12:39 UTCFinal Results75 voters

Дорогие подписчики, канал существует уже не один месяц, поэтому думаю, пора собрать с вас обратную связь и понять, что можно улучшить и чего не хватает🛠

  1. Всё хорошо!40%
  2. Мало информации(темы не раскрыты)7%
  3. Много информации(перебор/сложно)3%
  4. Редко выходит материал(знаю😅)32%
  5. Большие проблемы с орфографией4%
  6. Очень не хватает определённых тем7%
  7. Нужны доп. форматы(видео, стримы, чат, для обсуждения вопросов/проблем)24%
  8. Разбора боевых задач44%
  9. Советы/обсуждение книг/курсов и т. п.28%
  10. Другое...4%

The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 5 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

[PYTHON:TODAY]
@python2day · 63,827
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KarmanovichDev” (@KarmanovichDev), 554 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KarmanovichDev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.