Кф закрыт навсегда патент с нами

Channel
Khabilovy - K7V
@KHABILOVY
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002649175274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KHABILOVY |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 3 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KHABILOVY |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 3 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 3 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5406781900545090444 | 17 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5458793177110560526 | 16 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5393129307612660964 | 15 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5406790048098049703 | 15 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5413832265455136159 | 13 | 9.35% | |
| custom 5406845715169176872 | 12 | 8.63% | |
| custom 5413614076821531250 | 12 | 8.63% | |
| custom 5413765006267282315 | 10 | 7.19% | |
| custom 5465277203337997542 | 10 | 7.19% | |
| custom 5156805281975371394 | 5 | 3.60% | |
| custom 5395316210470508260 | 4 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5843802510904529523 | 4 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5188357838308656298 | 2 | 1.44% | |
| custom 5458640916224950893 | 2 | 1.44% | |
| custom 5463001527801109725 | 2 | 1.44% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2025 to 15 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤✅ 😾: FATIMA 🔥 RIZA 🔥ADINA 🔥MEDINA 🔥 ZHAN 🔥AYNAZIM 🔥 AMINA 🔥 ZARINA 🔥 DILYARА 🤫: NURISLAM 🔥 ABZAL 🔥 AZIMAT 🔥 TAMIRLAN порядок значение не имеет, список в дальнейшем будет пополняться активными участниками ) ✅
custom 546527720333799754210custom 54067900480980497037custom 53931293076126609646custom 54138322654551361596custom 54067819005450904444custom 54068457151691768724custom 58438025109045295234custom 54136140768215312503
Sticker, posted without a caption
zayavka tastamas bwrın ïnïc koy onsız zayavka kabıldaymız ✅ ïnïc - K7V , 08 bio - @KHABILOVY
custom 54587931771105605267custom 54067819005450904446custom 54136140768215312505custom 54067900480980497034custom 54068457151691768724custom 54137650062672823153custom 54138322654551361593custom 51883578383086562982
PATENT 📶 INITIAL 📤 RULES « Khabilovs are waiting for you💯» ANONY 📤 ARCHIVE 📤 BO$$
custom 53931293076126609649custom 54067819005450904447custom 54587931771105605266custom 51568052819753713945custom 53953162104705082604custom 54067900480980497034custom 54068457151691768724custom 54136140768215312504
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @KHABILOVY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,294,048 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@KHABILOVY named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Khabilovy - K7V” (@KHABILOVY), 8 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KHABILOVY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.