Channel
@abitaevys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002420030858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abitaevys |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abitaevys |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 2 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2025 to 22 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
с сегодняшнего дня @AECBERKOVY и @abitaevy состоят в браке брак — не конец романтики, а её трансформация: из страстных вспышек в тёплое, надёжное сияние, что греет годами, и мы надеемся, что этот брак будет олицетворением данного описания ❤️ 12.05.25
🪽🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🪽 🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅 🐉🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Амир, Шадияр, Жаклин, Айдос, Милан, Милана, Маххабат, Атлантик, Еркебулан, Енлик, Индус, Арсен, Томирис, Айзере, Моля, Джей, Диана, Асылым, Теро, Алихан 🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 LOTTO MARGULANOVY QASYMKHANOVY AECBERKOVY AMANGELDINOVY QYLYSHOVTAR ZHUMABAEVY COBP ABITAEVY SULTANOVY TEXAS ZHANSERIKOV RABINOVY ULTRAMEN 🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅 Порядок не имеет значение, список
нам не нужны правила, у нас есть братство @BIZBVR 🌟 @abitaevy
нам не нужны правила, у нас есть братство @LOTTODM 🌟 @abitaevy
нам не нужны правила, у нас есть братство @khabilovy 🌟 @abitaevy
❤1
нам не нужны правила, у нас есть братство @GL7RULYAT 🌟 @abitaevy
info. pinned «🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟’🌟🌟🌟 AECBERKOVY - AYAN NAIMANOVY - ASKAR QYLYSHOVY - ZARA ORRION - ZARA LEXUSOVY - AMINA FEEL WE - AKOSI ZHASULANS - ALAN VEXOR - ALIKHAN KHABILOVY - NURISLAM GOLOVKIN - ASYLYM LOTTO - DAMIR BELIEVER - AZA»
✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🪙 : 𝑨𝒀𝑨𝑵, 𝑴𝑨𝑵𝑺𝑼𝑹 , 𝑹𝑶𝑴𝑨 , 𝑫𝑨𝑵𝑰𝒀𝑨𝑹 , 𝑵𝑼𝑹𝑺 , 𝑺𝑯𝑨𝑫𝑬 , 𝑫𝑰𝑨𝑺 , 𝑨𝑫𝑰𝑳𝑩𝑬𝑲 , 𝑩𝑨𝑳𝑨𝑩𝑶𝑶 , 𝑲𝑬𝑹𝑰𝑴 🎀 : 𝑺𝑨𝑩𝑰𝑵𝑨 , 𝑨𝑰𝒀𝑴 , 𝑨𝒀𝑨𝑼 , 𝑮𝒀𝑳𝑼 , 𝑵𝑨𝒁𝒁 , 𝑨𝑹𝑼𝒁𝑯𝑨𝑵 , 𝒀𝑬𝑵𝑳𝑰𝑲 , 𝑨𝑰 , 𝑨𝑳𝑰𝒀𝑨 , 𝑺𝑯𝑨𝑻𝑻𝒀𝑲 , 𝒁𝑯𝑨𝑵𝑨𝑹 , 𝒁𝑯𝑨𝑵𝑰 , 𝑨𝑫𝑰𝑵𝑼𝑹𝑨 𝑴𝑨𝑰𝑱𝑼𝑹𝑬𝑲𝑻𝑬𝑹🤩 🤩𝑳𝑶𝑻𝑻𝑶 - 𝑫𝑨𝑴𝑰𝑹 🤩𝑺𝑯𝑨𝑯𝑴𝑨𝑹𝑶𝑽𝒀 🤩𝑬𝑳𝑬𝑽𝑨𝑻𝑬𝑬 🤩𝑲𝑨𝑹𝑨𝑱𝑨𝑵𝑶𝑽𝒀𝒀 🤩𝑨𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑼𝑹𝑶𝑽𝒀 🤩𝑽𝑬𝑿𝑶𝑹 🤩𝑮𝑯𝑶𝑺𝑻 🤩𝑸𝒀𝑳𝒀𝑺𝑯𝑶𝑽𝑻𝑨𝑹 🤩𝑼𝑨𝑳𝑰𝑬𝑽𝒀 🤩𝑨𝑩𝑰𝑻𝑨𝑬𝑽𝒀 🤩𝑬𝑹𝑩𝑶𝑳𝑨𝑻𝑶𝑽𝒀𝒀 🤩𝑩𝑨𝑳𝑰𝑬𝑽𝑬𝑹 🤩𝑮𝑶𝑳𝑶𝑽𝑲𝑰𝑵 🤩𝑫𝑹𝑰𝑷 🤩𝑺𝑫𝑴 018 🤩𝑴𝑨𝑹𝑮𝑼𝑳𝑨𝑵𝑶𝑽𝒀𝒀 🤩𝑹𝑨𝑩𝑰𝑵𝑶𝑽𝒀…
нам не нужны правила, у нас есть братство. @vexorfml 🌟 @abitaevy
нам не нужны правила, у нас есть братство. @UFCSU4KA 🌟@abitaevy
нам не нужны правила, у нас есть братство @zhasulans1 🌟 @abitaevy
🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱 🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱 – 𝐋𝐄𝐗𝐔𝐒𝐎𝐕𝐘 🇰🇿: 𝐈𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐌 - 𝐀𝐁𝐈𝐋𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐔𝐑 - 𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐋 - 𝐊𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐌 - 𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐊 - 𝐃𝐈𝐘𝐀𝐑 - 𝐇𝐀𝐙Á𝐀𝐑 - 𝐀𝐁𝐔𝐁𝐀𝐊𝐑 - 𝐁𝐀𝐇𝐀 - 𝐁𝐄𝐊𝐙𝐀𝐓 - 𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐑 - 𝐃𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐀𝐋 - 𝐃𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐀𝐑 - 𝐈𝐒𝐀 - 𝐃𝐎𝐒𝐘𝐀 - 𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐓 - 𝟏 𝐁𝐀𝐋𝐀 - 𝐃𝐄𝐅 - 𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐒 - 𝐀𝐋𝐀𝐍 - 𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐇 - 𝐍𝐔𝐑𝐁𝐎𝐋𝐀𝐓 - 𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐋𝐀𝐍 - 𝐀𝐃𝐘𝐋𝐁𝐄𝐊 - 𝐃𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐑 - 𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐒𝐘𝐋 - 𝐌𝐀𝐃𝐈 🇰🇿: 𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐀 - 𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐀 - 𝐀𝐊𝐏𝐄𝐘𝐈𝐋 - 𝐙𝐄𝐑𝐄 - 𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐍 - 𝐒𝐘𝐌𝐁𝐀𝐓-𝐙𝐇𝐀𝐍 - 𝐈𝐗𝐀 - 𝐀𝐒𝐋𝐘 - 𝐍𝐄𝐒𝐈 - 𝐀𝐈𝐒𝐔𝐋𝐔 - 𝐓𝐎𝐋𝐊𝐘𝐍 - 𝐐𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐐𝐀𝐓 - 𝐌𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐊𝐀 - 𝐊𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐀 - 𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐀 - 𝐀𝐑𝐔𝐙𝐇𝐀𝐍 - 𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐀 - 𝐊𝐀…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abitaevys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,076,730 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@abitaevys named 25 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“info.” (@abitaevys), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abitaevys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.