Channel
@JungPsyCoach
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
267subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001549905720 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JungPsyCoach |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JungPsyCoach |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 267 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 266 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 266 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 394 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
82 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 69.5% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 26.8% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
От Самости до Ужасной матери. От фобии до принятия жизни, как феномена. Можно превращусь в поведенческого терапевта и задам вам вопрос: оцените свою склонность к страху перед насекомыми от 0 до 10, где 0 - это спокойствие и принятие (любить не обязательно), а 10 - паника. 4 года назад мы с семьёй уехали гулять в финский город Турку, взяв с собой детей. После прогулки мы отправились в лес и переночевали в тишине и п…
❤4🔥4
Время Логоса. Время духа Когда душа в отчаянии, на помощь приходит Дух. Он бодр, собран, привержен, красив, бескорыстен. И на нем держится жизнь, как виноградная лоза на опоре. Так бывает, что случайное слово другого человека поддержит и запомнится одухотворяющим голосом. Оно вселит энергию, какую-то силу, необьяснимую веру не в благополучное решение вопроса, а в жизнь. Потому что станет понятным, что жизнь существ…
🔥8
Глазами юнгианки pinned «Иногда приходит время посмотреть в то, что причиняет боль и ставит неотвеченный вопрос. Если вы готовы довериться, углубиться в это, услышать то неозвученное, что, возможно, годами сидит внутри, можете прийти ко мне. В анализ приходят тогда, когда происходят…»
Иногда приходит время посмотреть в то, что причиняет боль и ставит неотвеченный вопрос. Если вы готовы довериться, углубиться в это, услышать то неозвученное, что, возможно, годами сидит внутри, можете прийти ко мне. В анализ приходят тогда, когда происходят события внешней или внутренней реальности, которые сложно осмыслить, которые лишены голоса, однако все же беспокоят и приглашают к исследованию. Форматы работы …
❤1
Один из интересных феноменов этого мира: замечали ли вы, как из риска впасть в депрессию люди тяготеют к лёгким маниакальным состояниям? Заполняют свою жизнь так, чтобы не было ни малейшего просвета побыть наедине с собой или в длинной хорошей беседе с соседом. Идут к победам. Ищут острых ощущений. И, что самое интересное, что меня зацепило, что рекомендуют это публично, как способ справляться с реальностью. Вчера в …
❤5
Снова дороги ведут куда-то, будто я и не подвластна им. Я очень устаю от длинных дорог, они выбивают едва выстроенную почву из-под ног и как-то нарушают покой. С другой стороны, они заставляют разглядеть важное. Научиться не суетиться, не контролировать этот хаос с двумя детьми, а показывать им разнообразие мира, сохраняя себя, опору, гибкость, радость и намерение. Иногда в дороге я могу быть наблюдателем и только и…
❤6🔥2
По мотивам проведенной встречи написала текст: Между прошлым и будущим, как между небом и землей. Аркан "Повешенный", как метафора перехода, смена идентичности и проживания кризиса.
❤6
Встреча через 1,5 часа. Напишите мне в лс или в комментариях, если хотите прийти.
❤4
Друзья, помните, как нам рассказывали о том, что мы живём в двух мирах? В общем, далеко отправляться не надо в недры бессознательного, чтобы их распознать. Достаточно зайти в комментарии в моем канале, здесь, и увидеть тишину. И зайти вот сюда, и увидеть комментарии 😊 Почему-то из канала их не видно. Присоединяйтесь.
Умение смеяться над собой бесценно. Над теми ситуациями, в которые попадает человек. Ведь если человек может посмеяться, легко улыбнуться себе, даже в сложную минуту - освободится цепкая хватка за собственное Эго и придёт ощущение свободы и радости. И человек даже в сложной ситуации увидит что-то интересное. Смех, здоровый, тонкий и живой, даже возможность видеть ситуацию шире. Не заостряться на одном. Напоминает о …
❤2⚡1
рубрика #психологитожеотдыхают 😊 Кто хочет, поделитесь фотографией, как у вас летом, что красивое, легкое, греющее, вдохновляющее, о чем твердит природа (я знаю, что некоторые регионы заливают дождём) 😉
❤5🔥1
Внимание, вопрос: чем ещё можно? На встрече будем обсуждать и этот аспект тоже, ведь с сомнением можно справиться действием, можно - любовью и верой. Но можно ли, если человек ещё находится в том самом состоянии "перехода", из которого крайне затруднено любое движение. Почему, для чего? Обсудим. П. С. Я наблюдаю массу людей без сомнений или же тех, у которых область сомнения локализирована. Например, человек может ч…
❤2🔥1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @JungPsyCoach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
За автономию мы платим сомнением. Правда ли это?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 452,984 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глазами юнгианки” (@JungPsyCoach), 267 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JungPsyCoach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.