Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جامع لایو | Jame Live

Channel

جامع لایو | Jame Live

@JameLivech

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,569subscribers

-2,452 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009561953
TypeChannel
Username@JameLivech
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/JameLivech

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@JameLivech/127569 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 11:37 UTC@MarvelKonkor/11366610 Feb 2026, 11:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@JameLivech/127571 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 13:23 UTC@MarvelKonkor/11366810 Feb 2026, 13:47 UTC1.0024 minutes
@JameLivech/127573 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 13:47 UTC@MarvelKonkor/11367010 Feb 2026, 13:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@JameLivech/127577 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 14:20 UTC@MarvelKonkor/11367410 Feb 2026, 14:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@JameLivech/127579 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 14:30 UTC@MarvelKonkor/11367610 Feb 2026, 14:49 UTC1.0019 minutes
@JameLivech/127581 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 14:49 UTC@MarvelKonkor/11367810 Feb 2026, 14:49 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@MarvelKonkor9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (9–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 February 2026 to 4 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @JameLivech — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far below this size band

16.2 average views per post against 15,633 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.104%. Across the 7,801 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.63% and 16.9%, with a median of 8.53%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (21 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled340
Mature posts only0.106% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers15,633 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 7,801 channels · p10 1.56% · p25 3.63% · p50 8.53% · p75 16.9% · p90 29.2%
Position in cohort0.423th percentile · 1/83 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.185% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,56918,02116,7957 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -2,452. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,201–18,389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 09:1015,569-15
10 Nov 2026, 03:4915,584-12
8 Nov 2026, 21:0115,596-18
7 Nov 2026, 12:0515,614-9
6 Nov 2026, 12:0915,623-10
5 Nov 2026, 10:3615,633-6
4 Nov 2026, 10:0415,639-10
3 Nov 2026, 11:5115,649-17
2 Nov 2026, 09:1015,666-12
1 Nov 2026, 05:5015,678-16
31 Oct 2026, 06:2915,694-14
30 Oct 2026, 06:0915,708-7
29 Oct 2026, 08:4915,715-15
28 Oct 2026, 04:0815,730-11
27 Oct 2026, 03:4715,741-14
26 Oct 2026, 06:4715,755-15
25 Oct 2026, 05:2615,770-12
24 Oct 2026, 02:1015,782-17
23 Oct 2026, 04:3715,799-24
22 Oct 2026, 01:1715,823first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.145%
avg views ÷ 15,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
22.6
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held49 (10 February 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total475
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤375.0%
💔125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC27 viewsread 12 November 2026

هر پنلی از پایه دهم و یازدهم دارید پیام بدید تا کنکورتون عضو ویژه مجموعه ما میشید و هر کلاس پک کتاب و ... که توی چنلای ما قرار بگیره برای شما بدون جوین شدن تو جایی ری اکشن زدن و هرچیزی ارسال میشه راه ارتباطی : @WOWHESBOT

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

2 Nov 2026, 06:54 UTC40 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 25 فیزیک دهم شجاعی آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

2 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTC41 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 20 سالیانه جامع شیمی مومن زاده آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

2 Nov 2026, 06:47 UTC39 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 25 فیزیک دهم شجاعی آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

1 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC32 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 23 زیست جامع عمارلو آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

1 Nov 2026, 17:40 UTC26 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 22 فیزیک جامع ایرانی آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

1 Nov 2026, 17:23 UTC17 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 25 ریاضی جامع عزیزی آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

1 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC18 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 25 شیمی دوازدهم هادیانفرد آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

1 Nov 2026, 08:41 UTC18 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 5 زبان دوازدهم قیومی آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

1 Nov 2026, 08:40 UTC17 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 23 فیزیک دوازدهم شجاعی آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

31 Oct 2026, 21:33 UTC17 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 25 شیمی دوازدهم فراهانی آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

31 Oct 2026, 21:33 UTC18 viewsread 12 November 2026

⭕ جلسه 25 زیست دوازدهم فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد.✅ ⬅️دسترسی سریع➡️

Signed 𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗠

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @JameLivech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @JameLivech as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
16 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فینیتو کرمی ریاضی
@Karami_Org · 23,285
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 September 2026
تاملند رایگان | Tamland
@Tamlund · 29,412
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
فیزیک قضاتی 1406
@Fiziik_GHozatii · 52,871
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
زیست فرهمندنیا یازدهم دوازدهم
@XFRHM · 21,494
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 October 2026
کانال رسمی ماز
@biomaze_VIp · 22,954
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
نهایی زیست حنیف عظیمی
@AzimiOrg · 40,388
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
ریاضی معین کرمی 1406
@riyazi_Karamiii · 80,840
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
ریاضی معین کرمی 1406
@moein_karami01 · 77,954
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
شیمی پارسا فراهانی رایگان
@parsafarahany · 142,280
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
ریاضی کرمی 1406
@ryazimoeen5776 · 164,353
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
گروه آموزشی ماز
@Teste_Talaei · 69,557
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
محافظ دیجی کلاس
@DiGi_CLASSS · 568
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
نهایی زبان قریشی
@film_paye · 34,994
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
مانستر پایه | سالیانه دهم یازدهم
@MonsterPaye · 24,696
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
نهایی زبان قریشی دهم یازدهم دوازدهم
@siewi · 40,134
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
فیزیک قضاتی دهم یازدهم دوازدهم 1406
@GhozzatiOrg · 20,891
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 October 2026
عربی فلاح 1406
@Arabbi_fallah · 42,085
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
هیتلر کنکور | HitlerKonkor
@Hitlerkonkur · 44,921
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
زیست حسین زاده 1406
@testbaks · 51,199
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
کلاس سالیانه 1406
@nahahi_darsi · 141,140
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
آقای ماز|منابع کنکور|ماز 1406
@biamaz · 138,372
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
معین کرمی دوازدهم یازدهم دهم
@Math_karam · 43,510
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
ماز | کلاسینو | تاملند
@maz_konkuor · 172,581
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
فیزیک براتی 1406
@mehti_barati · 71,667
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جامع لایو | Jame Live” (@JameLivech), 15,569 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JameLivech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.