Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

فریاد ما

@kurdestiny

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

101subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001755613264
TypeChannel
Username@kurdestiny
Descriptionاین وبسایت به هیچ حزب، دولت و سازمانی وابسته نیست و به طور مستقل و شفاف و با ادبیاتی کاملا حقوق بشری، مدیریت خواهد شد. تماس باادمین t.me/shahramelyasi
Created13 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/kurdestiny

Growth

101102101.57 August 2026 — 102 subscribers8 August 2026 — 101 subscribers9 August 2026 — 101 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:32101no change
8 Aug 2026, 19:24101-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:53102first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3529.7%
avg views ÷ 101 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,560
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.043%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total71,299
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,610
Videos
3,430
Links
5,770

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC808 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7SJNYrHrTM&list=PLlC6jzkl_FlVtH_4XPwrwyB1W0-TGeqzx

7 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC3 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7SJNYrHrTM&list=PLlC6jzkl_FlVtH_4XPwrwyB1W0-TGeqzx

7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

71 esecuzioni registrate a luglio; almeno 444 impiccati in Iran nel 2026 Almeno 71 persone sono state impiccate a luglio 2026, tra cui 36 per omicidio, 26 per reati legati alla droga, otto per reati contro la sicurezza nazionale e una per stupro. Sei manifestanti figuravano tra le vittime di luglio. Nei primi sette mesi del 2026, IHR ha registrato 444 esecuzioni, tra cui 12 donne, 17 cittadini stranieri e 80 apparten

7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC68 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

حکم #اعدام یک زندانی به‌نام توحید عبداللهی که با اتهام «قتل عمد» به قصاص نفس محکوم شده بود، در زندان مرکزی #اردبیل به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg

7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC65 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

با گذشت نزدیک به یک سال از اجرای حکم، سازمان حقوق بشر ایران #اعدام یک زندانی به‌نام عباس عبدالمالکی را که در پی یک نزاع دسته‌جمعی با اتهام «قتل عمد» به قصاص نفس محکوم شده بود، در زندان قزل‌حصار #کرج تایید می‌کند. این زندانی هیچ‌گاه به قتل اعتراف نکرده بود و تا پای چوبه‌دار بر بی‌گناهی خود تاکید داشت. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRi

7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC58 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

حکم #اعدام یک زندانی به‌نام علی پناهی‌نژاد که با اتهام «قتل عمد» به قصاص نفس محکوم شده بود، در زندان #دزفول به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg

6 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈3,460 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

در ماه ژوئیه ۲۰۲۶ دست‌کم ۷۱ نفر در ایران #اعدام شدند. در این ماه، ۳۶ نفر با اتهام قتل عمد، ۲۶ نفر با اتهام‌های مرتبط با مواد مخدر، هشت نفر با اتهام‌های امنیتی و یک نفر با اتهام تجاوز به عنف اعدام شدند. ۶ نفر از اعدام‌شدگان از معترضان دی‌ماه بودند و یک نفر از معترضان جنبش «زن، زندگی، آزادی». #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg

5 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC290 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

حکم #اعدام آروین خیرخواه، جوانی که با اتهام امنیتی «محاربه» به اعدام محکوم شده بود، در زندان #شاهرود اجرا شد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg

4 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈7,060 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

حکم #اعدام دست‌کم شش زندانی که با اتهامات مربوط به «مواد مخدر» به اعدام محکوم شده بودند، در زندان #تایباد به اجرا درآمد. هویت پنج تن از این افراد که شامل سه تبعه کشور #افغانستان و یک شهروند #بلوچ می‌شود، ملا ربیع عبدالمحمدی، سخی عبدالمحمدی، قائد نصیری، نادر آبیل و مظفر میناپور احراز شده است. سه زندانی تبعه افغانستان در حالی اعدام شدند که از حق انجام آخرین ملاقات با خانواده خود محروم بودند. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم

3 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC785 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

حکم #اعدام دست‌کم دو زندانی بلوچ به‌نام‌های محمدعلی نارویی و محمدبخش شه‌بخش که در پرونده‌های جداگانه با اتهامات مربوط به «مواد مخدر» به اعدام محکوم شده بودند، در زندان #دامغان به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg

👏1

3 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈3,910 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

خبرگزاری میزان، وابسته به قوه قضاییه، گزارش داد که امید بهزاد و پوریا صفوت روز ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ در مکانی نامعلوم اعدام شدند. این دو نفر با اتهام «جاسوسی و همکاری اطلاعاتی با رژیم صهیونیستی» به اعدام محکوم شده بودند. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg

👏1

3 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈5,150 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @IranHumanRightsOrgPhoto

حکم #اعدام دست‌کم دو زندانی، یک زن و یک مرد به‌نام‌های مهتاب شیرمحمدی و سیروس صیادی که در پرونده‌های جداگانه با اتهام «قتل عمد» به قصاص نفس محکوم شده بودند، در زندان مرکزی #یاسوج به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایت‌های اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kurdestiny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فریاد ما” (@kurdestiny), 101 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kurdestiny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.