Channel
@IntArbRu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002640762579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IntArbRu |
| Description | The ENG version of the largest TG-channel in Russia about international arbitration managed by the lawyers of KIAP Law Firm. The posts' texts are taken from the main channel and translated into ENG by AI. s.sultanov@kiap.com, a.ryabova@kiap.com |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IntArbRu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 84 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 84 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 150 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☝️ UEFA Considers Proceedings Against FIFA Over Planned Sale of Stake to Company Owned by Donald Trump's Relative Last week, FIFA President Gianni Infantino announced plans to establish a subsidiary, FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), which would manage FIFA's flagship competitions, including the FIFA World Cup. Under the proposal, a 21% stake in FFE was to be sold to a group of private investors led by Thrive Eternal. …
⚖️ You Can't Step into the Mississippi Three Times: Persistent Policyholders Fail to Litigate in Louisiana Instead of Arbitrating in London—and End Up Paying for Their Persistence Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd. (the insurer), incorporated in Bermuda, issued a property insurance policy to Fertitta Entertainment, Inc., a U.S. hospitality holding company, extending coverage to its affiliated companies (the claimants). Th…
👔 The Warrior-Lawyer and His Word Is Always at the Ready Socioservice LLC (the applicant) filed an application with the Arbitrazh Court of the Republic of Tatarstan seeking the issuance of a writ of execution to enforce an arbitral award rendered by the private legal protection institution, the Warrior-Lawyer Bureau. The court refused to issue a writ of execution for the arbitral award, citing the following reasons…
⚖️ The St. Petersburg and Leningrad Region Arbitrazh Court Reiterates that, Absent Targeted Sanctions Against a Party and the Subject Matter of the Dispute, There Are No Grounds for Applying the Lugovoy Law Intervtorresurs LLC (the applicant, purchaser) entered into a framework agreement with Icdas Celik Enerjy Tersane Ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S. (Turkey) and Vanomet AG (Switzerland), acting as the seller and sub-seller, …
⚖️ Whatever the FAS and the Ministry of Finance May Say, They Remain Arbitrable: The Moscow Arbitrazh Court Confirms the Arbitrability of Disputes Arising from Contracts under Federal Law No. 223-FZ on procurement VEGA LLC (the claimant) filed a claim with the Moscow Arbitrazh Court against NIKIMT-Atomstroy JSC (the respondent), seeking to invalidate a contractual clause providing that disputes arising out of the co…
⚖️ The Moscow Arbitrazh Court Refused to Set Aside an ICAC Award Rendered Against a Russian Company, Holding that a Party’s Inadequate Participation in the Arbitration Does Not in Itself Mean that the Party Was Deprived of the Opportunity to Present Its Case A tribunal of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ICAC at the RF CCI) issued an award in favor of th…
⚖️ The Moscow Arbitrazh Court Refuses to Set Aside MAC Award, Rejecting Lack-of-Notice Arguments: Respondent Was Notified by Email and Actively Participated in the Proceedings A tribunal of the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation (MAC at the RF CCI) rendered an award ordering ING-SHIPPING LLC (the applicant) to pay Sea & River Shipping Company LLC (the re…
☕️ Russian courts: "A word spoken is past recalling" ☝️Turkish courts: using AI and developing new approaches to find reciprocity in the procedure of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments In a case concerning the recognition and enforcement of an Amsterdam court judgment against a Turkish company, the Turkish court used artificial intelligence (AI) in drafting the judgment. In the case, the main issue w…
⚖️ The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Proposes Restoring Appellate Review in Cases Concerning the Enforcement and Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards, as well as Anti-Suit Injunctions under Article 248.2 of the Arbitrazh Procedure Code In addition to the thematic review that we wrote about yesterday, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has also issued a Resolution dedicated to arbitration. In it, the C…
⚖️ The Russian Supreme Court Has Published a Thematic Review of Judicial Practice: “On the Application by Arbitrazh (Commercial) Courts of Legislation on Special Economic Measures Introduced to Protect the National Interests of the Russian Federation” The Russian Supreme Court has published its Review of Judicial Practice relating to sanctions. The 53-page document provides guidance on the invalidity of transactions…
⚖️ Further to the previous post, Judge Jeremy Cook also addressed Russia’s challenges to the arbitrators and found no grounds to uphold them DIFC Court Judge Jeremy Cook reached the following conclusions regarding Russia’s three applications to challenge the arbitrators in the PCA arbitration: 1️⃣Russia’s challenge to Olufunke Adekoya and Charles Poncet. Russia argued that the arbitrators had prejudged the key issu…
⚖️ DIFC Court Judge Jeremy Cook Issues Penal Injunction Against Russia in Wintershall Case, Confirming His November Interim Injunction As a reminder, the dispute concerns arbitration proceedings initiated by Wintershall against Russia before the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). On 4 June, DIFC Court Judge Jeremy Cook issued a penal injunction, granting Wintershall’s applic…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IntArbRu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“International Arbitration (IA by AI)” (@IntArbRu), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IntArbRu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.