Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پژوهشکده خرداد

Channel

پژوهشکده خرداد

@Institute_Khordad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

703subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002206575283
TypeChannel
Username@Institute_Khordad
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Institute_Khordad

Growth

7017037027 August 2026 — 702 subscribers8 August 2026 — 702 subscribers8 August 2026 — 701 subscribers16 August 2026 — 703 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 701–703 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:54703+2
8 Aug 2026, 13:34701-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:19702no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:53702first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.40%
avg views ÷ 703 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (11 December 202528 July 2026)
Views total52
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 55s
Average length
3m 58s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10179.5%
🔥129.45%
😁64.72%
👏43.15%
👌21.57%
👍10.787%
👎10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Theoreal

با هم علیه اعدام

5

9 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC119 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Theoreal

تل اجسادْ حافظۀ جمعی را رها نمی‌کند؛ هر چقدر هم تاریخ، تاریخِ فاتحان، بکوشد عددش را تقلیل دهد، مسببش را به عاملی دیگر نسبت دهد، یا در تمامیتش تشکیک کند. تصویر سردخانهْ سند حافظه است، گواهیِ جان‌باختگان، آرشیوِ صدای دردمندان. و مخصوصاً صدا. هر تصویری را صدایی همراهی می‌کند؛ ناله‌ها و ضجه‌های کسی که فرزند، دوست یا عزیزش را گم کرده و اکنون در اتاق‌ها و راهروهای سردخانه در پی ردّی از اوست: چهره‌ای، لباسی، یا شاید تتمه‌‌ا

👏4

9 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC101 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔴رضا پهلوی : شش ماه پیش، تو همین شب‌ها، تهران و بعد سراسر ایران تو تاریکی فرو رفت، اما اون تاریکی هم نتونست مردم رو تو خونه نگه داره؛ 18 و 19 دی فقط دو شب اعتراض نبود؛ دو شبی بود که سکوت ایران شکست. میلیون‌ها نفر اومدن خیابون، روی پشت‌بوم‌ها رفتن، اما حکومت با گلوله جوابشون رو داد. برای من عدد 40 هزار فقط یه آمار نیست؛ پشت هر عدد، یه جوون، یه فرزند، یه خواهر یا برادره که دیگه به خونه برنگشت. من هر روز بهشون فکر می‌ک

11😁3

2 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Theoreal

واقعه کربلا در آینه منابع اسلامی: بررسی انتقادی منابع و موانع تاریخی واقعه کربلا که به عاشورا معروف است، اگر مهم‌ترین اتفاق تاریخ صدر اسلام نباشد، قطعاً یکی از مهم‌ترین‌هاست. بر اساس گزارش‌های مشهور، این واقعه در سال ۶۱ هجری قمری (برابر با ۶۸۰ میلادی) رخ داده است. در این نبرد، حسین بن علی و یارانش از یک سو، و نیروهای یزید بن معاویه، خلیفه اموی، از سوی دیگر، در شهر کربلا رویاروی شدند. نیروهای یزید توسط عبدالله بن زیا

2

3 Jun 2026, 13:30 UTC178 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Achaemenid_Heritage

🔹آیا اساساً می‌توان اصطلاح «تبلیغات سیاسی» یا «پروپاگاندا» را در زمینهٔ جهان باستان به کار برد؟ پژوهشگران این پرسش را مطرح کرده‌اند که آیا اساساً می‌توان اصطلاح «تبلیغات سیاسی» را در زمینهٔ جهان باستان به کار برد یا نه. اگر نیازی به دستکاری افکار عمومی وجود نداشت، تبلیغات چه فایده‌ای می‌توانست داشته باشد؟ اوپنهایم استدلال می‌کرد که کتیبه‌های شاهی اساساً کارکردی آیینی و تشریفاتی داشتند. گارِلی نیز معتقد بود که کتیبه

👍1

28 May 2026, 13:14 UTC158 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AudioSavedBotVideo

📥 @AudioSavedBot orqali yuklab olindi

27 May 2026, 23:20 UTC184 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بعد از مدت طولانی ای،درود بر همراهان گرامی! به امید آزادی و رهایی از استبداد. <ایران هرگز نمی‌میرد>

6

25 Feb 2026, 13:53 UTC231 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Achaemenid_HeritagePhoto

سپیده‌دم امروز، استاد عبدالمجید ارفعی، متخصص برجسته زبان‌های باستانی، درگذشت. 🖤 او پس از مدتی مبارزه با مشکلات ریوی، ساعاتی پیش چشم از جهان فروبست. استاد ارفعی فارغ‌التحصیل رشته زبان‌های باستانی از مؤسسه شرق‌شناسی شیکاگو بود. از مهم‌ترین آثار او می‌توان به فرمان کوروش بزرگ (۱۳۸۹) و گل‌نبشته‌های باروی تخت جمشید (۱۳۸۷) اشاره کرد، روانش شاد و نامش پر آوازه باد. @Achaemenid_Heritage

13

8 Feb 2026, 21:00 UTC407 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

با اینحال که دیر اعلام کردم اما بعنوان مالک و بنیانگذار پژوهشکده خرداد و شخصی که در ده ها کانال دیگه فعالیت دارم از اینجا اعلام میکنم که تا وقتی که آزادی برای مردمم مثل نور در تاریکی شب طلوع نکنه هیچگونه فعالیتی ندارم. برای ایران. <ایران هرگز نمی‌میرد>

25🔥3😁2👎1

25 Jan 2026, 13:31 UTC385 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

خون به زمین فرو نرفت روی زمین پخش شد از زیر هر سنگ جوشید و جوشید و به راه افتاد هرکس آن را می­‌دید می­‌فهمید که جایی بی‌گناهی را کشته­‌اند… -شاهرخ مسکوب ‌

10

5 Jan 2026, 21:21 UTC386 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Poooch3

"در سال ۱۷۷۳ از دولباخ پرسیدند که چه علاجی برای تباهی فراگیر جوامع وجود دارد، درحالی که عوامل بسیاری... بی‌نظمی و بدبختی فراگیر را تداوم می‌بخشند؟ او گفت تنها راه درمان چنین جامعهٔ بیماری برانداختن کل نظام فاسد سلسله‌مراتبی، حذف کامل امتیازهای طبقاتی و تبعیض و جای‌گزینی با جامعه‌ای عادلانه‌تر است. و تنها راه رسیدن به چنین جامعه‌ای حمله به عقاید نادرست و فریاد زدن 'حقیقت' است. دولباخ معتقد است اگر عقاید نادرست منشأ هم

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Institute_Khordad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پژوهشکده خرداد” (@Institute_Khordad), 703 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Institute_Khordad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.