Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for داخلی جنرال، علوم پزشکی تهران- بیمارستان امام

Channel

داخلی جنرال، علوم پزشکی تهران- بیمارستان امام

@Imam_Internalmedicine

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,809subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001080816702
TypeChannel
Username@Imam_Internalmedicine
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Imam_Internalmedicine

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,7832,8092,79621 August 2026 — 2,788 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,791 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,783 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,787 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,786 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,792 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,808 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,809 subscribers21 August 202611 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 21 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,779–2,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 23:592,809+1
7 Sept 2026, 12:002,808+16
2 Sept 2026, 17:122,792+6
31 Aug 2026, 01:552,786-1
28 Aug 2026, 10:162,787+4
25 Aug 2026, 06:522,783-8
22 Aug 2026, 14:132,791+3
21 Aug 2026, 13:012,788first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

26 Feb 2026, 03:07 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 21 August 2026

✅ پیام نهایی: با وجود پیشرفت سریع روش های پاراکلینیک هنوز شرح حال و معاینه شاه کلید حل معماهای تشخیصی است.

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

26 Feb 2026, 03:05 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 21 August 2026

با چندین نوبت اخذ شرح حال مجدد از بیمار و خانواده مشخص شد ایشان سال ها به جهت تمایل به افزایش وزن با مراجعه به عطاری پودر افلاطون مصرف می کرده است و به دنبال AVN و جراحی مصرف را ناگهانی قطع کرده است و بروز ضعف و کاهش وزن نیز از آنزمان آغاز شده. سطح کورتیزول و ACTH ساعت ۸ صبح برای بیمار چک شد که : Serum Cortisol: 1.2 ACTH: 45 گزارش شد. تشخیص: نارسایی آدرنال بدنبال قطع ناگهانی استرویید آیا علایم بیمار با تشخیص س

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

25 Feb 2026, 19:54 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 21 August 2026

تشخیص نهایی بیمار فردا خدمت دوستان به اشتراک گذاشته میشه.

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

24 Feb 2026, 18:47 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 21 August 2026
Poll

با مجموع شواهد چه اقدامی مناسب است؟

  1. با شک به لنفوم به انجام بیوپسی مغز استخوان اصرار کنیم37%
  2. در شرح حال دنبال نکات احتمالی پنهان بگردیم45%
  3. با احتمال بدخیمی با منشا دیگر PET scan انجام دهیم18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

24 Feb 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 21 August 2026

نتایج بررسی های تکمیلی: ✔️اکو : نرمال ✔️TFT: نرمال ✔️سرولوژی بروسلا: منفی ✔️مارکرهای انتی فسفولیپید: منفی ✔️کلونوسکوپی: نرمال ✔️Hiv ab: منفی

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

24 Feb 2026, 03:21 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 21 August 2026
Poll

چه اقداماتی را توصیه می کنید:

  1. چک تست های تیروییدی28%
  2. انجام‌بیوپسی مغز استخوان41%
  3. بررسی از نظر مارکرهای سندروم انتی فسفولیپید25%
  4. برونکوسکوپی جهت رد TB13%
  5. بررسی سرولوژی بروسلا32%
  6. ‌PET Scan15%
  7. اسکن هسته ای استخوان7%
  8. اکو از جهت اندوکاردیت30%
  9. کلونوسکوپی41%

The shares total 232%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

24 Feb 2026, 03:14 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 21 August 2026

هر بیمار یک درس، شماره ۱ : آقای ۴۵ ساله با کاهش وزن ۲۵ کیلوگرمی، AVN دو طرفه سر فمور، بی اشتهایی و DVT بدنبال جراحی تعویض مفصل سر فمور مراجعه کرده است. از تعریق شاکی است اما تب ندارد. فشار خون ۱۰۰/۶۰ ، PR: 95 و سایر معاینات به جز کاشکسی نکته دیگری ندارد. در بررسی ها: ✔️CBC: WBC: 4500 with nl diff Hb: 9 MCV: ۸۱ PLT: 110000 ✔️ESR: 20 ✔️LDH: 345 ✔️Cr: 0.9, Na: 136, K: 3.1, Ca:8.5 ✔️AST: 35, ALT:40, ALP: 135 ✔️Alb: 2.5

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

27 Dec 2025, 08:00 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 21 August 2026

اقدام مناسب کدام است؟

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

27 Dec 2025, 07:51 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 21 August 2026
Poll

اقام مناسب کدام است؟

  1. بیوپسی ریه تحت گاید ct14%
  2. بیوپسی پلور تحت گاید سونوگرافی19%
  3. درناژ تشخیصی مایع پلور54%
  4. سی تی انژیوگرافی ریه13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

27 Dec 2025, 07:49 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

27 Dec 2025, 07:49 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 21 August 2026

آقای جوان با احساس تنگی نفس به اورژانس مراجعه کرده است. سابقه بیماری مزمن ندارد. در حال حاضر دیسترس تنفسی ندارد. فشار خون ۱۱/۶ و HR=70 دارند و تبدار نیستند. سی تی اسکن ریه را ملاحظه میفرمایید👇

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

27 Dec 2025, 07:34 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 21 August 2026

Radiology Case Collection | 130+ cases | Geeky Medics https://geekymedics.com/radiology-case-collection/

Signed Dr.Khajavirad

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Imam_Internalmedicine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Feb 2026, 18:47 UTCFinal Results108 voters

با مجموع شواهد چه اقدامی مناسب است؟

  1. با شک به لنفوم به انجام بیوپسی مغز استخوان اصرار کنیم37%
  2. در شرح حال دنبال نکات احتمالی پنهان بگردیم45%
  3. با احتمال بدخیمی با منشا دیگر PET scan انجام دهیم18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Feb 2026, 03:21 UTCFinal Results97 voters

چه اقداماتی را توصیه می کنید:

  1. چک تست های تیروییدی28%
  2. انجام‌بیوپسی مغز استخوان41%
  3. بررسی از نظر مارکرهای سندروم انتی فسفولیپید25%
  4. برونکوسکوپی جهت رد TB13%
  5. بررسی سرولوژی بروسلا32%
  6. ‌PET Scan15%
  7. اسکن هسته ای استخوان7%
  8. اکو از جهت اندوکاردیت30%
  9. کلونوسکوپی41%

The shares total 232%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Dec 2025, 07:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz320 voters

اقام مناسب کدام است؟

  1. بیوپسی ریه تحت گاید ct14%
  2. بیوپسی پلور تحت گاید سونوگرافی19%
  3. درناژ تشخیصی مایع پلور54%
  4. سی تی انژیوگرافی ریه13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2025 to 26 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

زبان و پزشکی(قربانی)
@medterms · 39,623
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
تشخیص های افتراقی
@differential_diagnosis1 · 32,430
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
مدرسه پزشکی | امیرمحمد قربانی
@schoolofmedicine_ir · 26,480
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
کانال طِب اَطفال
@TebeAtfal · 51,629
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
Med_Skill
@med_skills · 37,802
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
📞 الو بیمارستان؟
@alo_bimarestan · 29,372
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
🧬Medical_Science_Apply✈
@Medical_Science_Apply · 28,846
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
StartQuiz
@Startquiz · 63,894
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
آموزش نسخه نویسی و طبابت استاد طب
@ostaadteb · 29,780
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“داخلی جنرال، علوم پزشکی تهران- بیمارستان امام” (@Imam_Internalmedicine), 2,809 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Imam_Internalmedicine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.