Channel
@IUVerdes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
227subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001086671319 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IUVerdes |
| Description | Canal informativo de toda la actividad de IU-Verdes RM. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IUVerdes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 227 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 227 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (6 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,017 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 63.2% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
OPINIÓN: CUANDO DENUNCIAR NO TE SALVA: VIOLENCIA MACHISTA, PRECARIEDAD Y UNAS POLÍTICAS QUE NO PROTEGEN A LAS MUJERES Por Penélope Luna, Coordinadora IU-Verdes Región de Murcia, y Cristina González, Responsable de la Red de Feminismos IU-Verdes Región de Murcia. https://iuverdes.es/actualidad/opinion-cuando-denunciar-no-te-salva-violencia-machista-precariedad-y-unas-politicas-que-no-protegen-a-las-mujeres/
⚫️ Basta de violencia machista y del negacionismo que la legitima. https://iuverdes.es/actualidad/izquierda-unida-verdes-region-de-murcia-condena-el-presunto-asesinato-machista-ocurrido-en-murcia-y-exige-reforzar-las-politicas-publicas-contra-la-violencia-de-genero/
✒️ Falta de ejecución presupuestaria en gestión forestal del Gobierno Regional Argumenta la consejera portavoz del Gobierno regional en relación con nuestra denuncia sobre la falta de ejecución presupuestaria de las partidas destinadas a la mejora de las masas forestales y la prevención de incendios, que los datos que utilizamos para sustentar dicha denuncia son incorrectos e incompletos. No, Marisa, nuestros datos…
👍1
🔥 Desde IU-Verdes denunciamos que el Gobierno de *López Miras deja sin ejecutar 11 millones de euros cada año para proteger nuestros montes de los incendios* . No es un recorte. Es una decisión política. - De 16 millones anuales para prevención, restauración y adaptación al cambio climático, solo ejecutan 1 de cada 3. - Vehículos: 0€ - Ayudas a propietarios: 0€ - Obras en Moratalla, Abarán, Ulea, Blanca y Jumilla: …
✒️ El PP vuelve a confiar en el mismo modelo que ya fracasó durante la burbuja inmobiliaria: más beneficios para la promoción privada con la promesa de que bajarán los precios. ¿Cómo puede el PP confiar el precio de la vivienda a la evolución de un mercado sometido a diferentes intereses que pueden ser, incluso, contrarios a los de quienes necesitan acceder a una vivienda, especialmente las personas más vulnerables?…
🔥 LA PREVENCIÓN SE HACE TODO EL AÑO, NO SOLO CUANDO EL MONTE ARDE. Precarizar al personal de extinción, privatizar la gestión y difundir mentiras sobre la normativa forestal solo nos hace más vulnerables. La gestión ambiental es responsabilidad de las Comunidades Autónomas. Desde IU-Verdes Región de Murcia lo tenemos claro: ✅ Más inversión en prevención y gestión adapted al cambio climático. ✅ Condiciones labora…
«No es aceptable que, mientras aumentan los ingresos de la Comunidad Autónoma, el Ejecutivo regional condene a los ayuntamientos a mantener durante toda la legislatura unos recursos claramente insuficientes para atender las necesidades de sus vecinos. Los municipios necesitan más inversión, no una financiación congelada». IUVerdes | Instagram | Bluesky | Facebook | X (Twitter)
❤3
PP y VOX aprueban juntos un decreto de vivienda «al servicio de la especulación y contra la democracia parlamentaria» La vivienda es un derecho, no un negocio. El PP vuelve a legislar para favorecer a los grandes intereses inmobiliarios mientras miles de jóvenes y familias trabajadoras siguen sin poder acceder a una vivienda digna. Este modelo solo consigue una cosa: aumentar la desigualdad y convertir el acceso a…
🇪🇭 Hoy en la Asamblea Regional hemos recibido a los niños y niñas saharauis que han llegado con el programa Vacaciones en Paz. Son el rostro más humano de un exilio que dura ya 50 años. Son el futuro de un pueblo que resiste en los campamentos de Tinduf y que no renuncia a su derecho a la autodeterminación. Desde Izquierda Unida lo tenemos claro: nuestra solidaridad con el pueblo saharaui no es coyuntural, es compro…
❤3
✒️ «El recorte de Sierra Espuña es un auténtico disparate jurídico» Salvar el rally no justifica desproteger nuestro entorno natural. Había alternativas legales sin necesidad de mutilar el Parque Regional. Frente a la vulneración del principio de no regresión ambiental, seguimos defendiendo nuestro patrimonio natural. Instagram | Bluesky | Facebook | X (Twitter)
❤2
✒️ El Partido Popular somete a las mujeres a una auténtica tortura física y psicológica por ejercer su derecho a abortar libremente. La Plataforma de Embarazadas Expulsadas de la Sanidad Pública reclaman que las interrupciones practicadas por causas médicas, que incluyen situaciones de grave riesgo para la vida o salud de la embarazada, se realicen en hospitales públicos. Los motivos son claros, pero además debe ga…
❤2
El Gobierno de López Miras ha decidido mantener la interrupción del embarazo ya sea voluntaria o por razones médicas, fuera de la sanidad pública, derivando recursos públicos a clínicas privadas en lugar de garantizar esta prestación en los hospitales públicos de la Región. Sigue vulnerando los derechos de las mujeres, rompiendo la continuidad asistencial que solo puede garantizar la Sanidad Pública. Los derechos d…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IUVerdes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 190,304 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IU-Verdes Región de Murcia🔻” (@IUVerdes), 227 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IUVerdes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.