Channel
@ITvsAI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002883580618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ITvsAI |
| Description | Интересное про IT и AI. Vibe-coding, агенты, LLM и мои мысли по этому поводу. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ITvsAI |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 129 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 129 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 43.8% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 34.3% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 16.2% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ТАТАР САН 2026 в 50 секундах: открытия, мощные кейсы, хакатон, дискуссии и порция реальных идей, которые можно тестировать Итог двух дней: конференция стала плотно практической — люди не просто слышали, а уже обсуждали, как внедрять. Стало больше спикеров, больше пространства для общения и еще больше шансов для трансформации! Спасибо, что были с нами в этот раз и до встречи на следующих событиях 26–27 июня // ИТ-п…
🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2🔥1🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Пссс… да, индустрию реально потряхивает ↖️ Агенты пишут код быстрее тебя, команды сжимаются до пары человек, и где-то на фоне постоянно зудит мысль: «А когда очередь дойдёт до меня?». Вроде бы работаешь больше, чем раньше, а чувство контроля — меньше. Это нормальные страхи. Ненормально — делать вид, что их нет. ТАТАР САН 2026 как раз про то, чтобы перестать прятать напряжение под шутками про нейросетки. Конференция…
❤2👌2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6❤3🥰1
Всем привет. Снова в Питере на SQA Days 38
🔥6❤1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥6❤2
➡️Почему ваша матрица компетенций бесполезна — и как ИИ её спасёт На докладе вы узнаете, как превратить матрицы компетенций в динамичный инструмент развития с помощью ИИ-агентов, автоматического сбора данных и адаптивной оценки. Поймете, почему стандартные подходы не работают, и как создать полноценную систему роста для ваших тестировщиков. Ждём всех на SQA Days 38 24-25 апреля в Санкт-Петербурге и онлайн❤️ ⚡️билет…
🔥8
Новый месяц предлагаю начать с новой рубрики #читаем. 🧠 Прочитал недавно интересную книгу "Заслуженный собеседник ....." (автор А.В. Курпатов) и понял, почему мы используем AI неправильно. Большинство из нас общаются с ChatGPT, Claude или другими AI как с калькулятором: задали вопрос — получили ответ. Но Андрей Курпатов в своей новой книге показывает, что мы упускаем 90% возможностей искусственного интеллекта. В чём…
❤4🔥2
📚 Название: "Заслуженный собеседник. Искусство диалога с искусственным интеллектом" ✍️ Автор: Андрей Курпатов 📅 2025#ITvsAI #AI #ChatGPT #ИскусственныйИнтеллект #КритическоеМышление #Курпатов #Промпты#Книги
❤1🔥1
🎉С наступающим Новым годом, друзья!🎉 Вот и заканчивается 2025-й — год, когда искусственный интеллект стал ещё ближе к нам, проник в каждый аспект нашей работы и творчества. Многие из вас достигли потрясающих результатов, научились работать с AI так, как раньше и не представляли. Но в моменты празднования я хочу напомнить вам о самом важном: AI развивается именно потому, что у нас есть человеческая фантазия, творче…
❤7🎉2
🤖 ОТП Банк и ТОЧКА В понедельник прошла отличная встреча с сообществом тестировщиков ОТП Банка по теме доклада применение Искусственного Интеллекта в проведении собеседований, с которым мы выступали на конференции Heisenbug Autumn 2025 🚀 Обсуждение получилось очень живым: было много вопросов, споров и положительных реакций. Самое ценное — видеть, как коллеги начинают задумываться о новых подходах к оценке кандидато…
❤3🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ITvsAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,118,810 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IT vs AI” (@ITvsAI), 129 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ITvsAI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.