Posted without readable text
β€191π91π₯32π11π10π€©10π₯°8π³6

Channel
@IMB01_channel
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
503,070subscribers
-12,100 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 316,228β1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002203667561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IMB01_channel |
| Description | π§ Test your knowledge in 20 seconds. Quiz tips, challenges and app updates. βΆοΈ Play: @erangraetbot |
| Created | 15 October 2024 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IMB01_channel |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 503,070 | -3,488 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 506,558 | -784 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 507,342 | -294 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 507,636 | -468 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 508,104 | -286 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:14 | 508,390 | -919 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 509,309 | -275 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 509,584 | -55 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:29 | 509,639 | -258 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:09 | 509,897 | -491 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 510,388 | -391 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 510,779 | -116 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 510,895 | -235 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 511,130 | -61 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 511,191 | -200 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 511,391 | -336 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 511,727 | -588 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 512,315 | +63 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 512,252 | -249 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 512,501 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 15 October 2024 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 116 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 16 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (15 October 2024 β 16 September 2026) |
| Views total | 21,030 |
| Reactions total | 871 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 1 October 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
82,104 reactions across 6 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 42,752 | 52.1% | |
| β€ | 22,846 | 27.8% | |
| π | 4,180 | 5.09% | |
| π | 3,786 | 4.61% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 3,760 | 4.58% | |
| π | 3,160 | 3.85% | |
| π€© | 633 | 0.771% | |
| π | 595 | 0.725% | |
| π₯ | 202 | 0.246% | |
| π | 65 | 0.079% | |
| π₯° | 31 | 0.038% | |
| πΎ | 29 | 0.035% | |
| π― | 29 | 0.035% | |
| β‘ | 12 | 0.015% | |
| π | 9 | 0.011% | |
| π | 8 | 0.01% | |
| π³ | 6 | 0.007% | |
| π | 1 | 0.001% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 82,104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2024 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @IMB01_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 October 2024 to 16 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
β€191π91π₯32π11π10π€©10π₯°8π³6
Posted without readable text
β€271π127π₯42π28πΎ17π―14π8π€©5
Posted without readable text
β€287π153π₯58π9π1
Posted without readable text
β€255π119π₯24π―15β‘12π€©12π₯°11π10
Posted without readable text
β€342π162π₯46π€©20π16π16πΎ12π₯°12
π§ Welcome to the "Quiz Challenge"! You have 20 secondsβjust how knowledgeable are you? β± Take on a timed general knowledge quiz. β Answer correctly to win cash rewards. π€ Invite friends and compete to see who knows more. How to play: 1. Tap "Start Quiz" below. 2. Open the mini-program to begin the challenge. 3. Select your answer before the countdown ends. Follow this channel for quiz tips, highlights from the chβ¦
π42,100β€21,500π4,180β€βπ₯3,760π3,760π3,160π595π€©586
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @IMB01_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@IMB01_channel edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ§ Quiz Challenge Channelβ (@IMB01_channel), 503,070 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IMB01_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.