✨ Start your NovaHub journey Looking for a tool or a different game? Make NovaHub a starting point for discovering apps. 👇 Tap Open NovaHub and start browsing.
🎉90❤63💯59🤩54👍53👏51🔥49😍45

Channel
@NovaHubChannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,068,883subscribers
+86,602 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002268655562 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NovaHubChannel |
| Description | NovaHub brings apps, tools, games, and services together in one place. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NovaHubChannel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:40 | 1,068,883 | -5,125 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 1,074,008 | -31,698 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 1,105,706 | +29,929 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:10 | 1,075,777 | +13,033 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:29 | 1,062,744 | +35,961 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:57 | 1,026,783 | -5,759 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:38 | 1,032,542 | -14,515 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:18 | 1,047,057 | +562 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:37 | 1,046,495 | -1,278 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 1,047,773 | -2,831 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 1,050,604 | -8,147 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 1,058,751 | -2,209 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 1,060,960 | -2,475 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 1,063,435 | -1,844 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 1,065,279 | -1,369 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 1,066,648 | -829 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 1,067,477 | -4,447 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 1,071,924 | +14,038 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:36 | 1,057,886 | -1,484 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 1,059,370 | first reading |
108 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 108 (26 June 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 734,290 |
| Reactions total | 20,702 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 05:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 27 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 25 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 23 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 17.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 35.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 8,940 views — 0.836% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 10,344).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /74410 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC | 254 minutes – 23 hours old | 3,780 views ~555 reactions | 60 minutes: 1,320 → 3.0 hours: 1,590 → 6.0 hours: 1,880 → 12 hours: 2,670 → 24 hours: 3,780still climbing at last reading | 3,780measured | 6.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7439 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC | 4664 minutes – 47 hours old | 4,560 views ~533 reactions | 3.0 hours: 1,540 → 6.0 hours: 1,810 → 12 hours: 2,190 → 24 hours: 2,750 → 2 days: 4,560still climbing at last reading | 2,750measured | 13 hours |
| /7428 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC | 6950 minutes – 3 days old | 5,240 views ~529 reactions | 60 minutes: 1,340 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,640 → 6.0 hours: 1,920 → 12 hours: 2,370 → 24 hours: 2,850 → 2 days: 3,940still climbing at last reading | 2,850measured | 16 hours |
| /7417 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC | 8822 minutes – 4 days old | 6,590 views ~87 reactions | 60 minutes: 1,220 → 3.0 hours: 1,980 → 6.0 hours: 2,520 → 12 hours: 3,090 → 24 hours: 3,980 → 2 days: 4,910still climbing at last reading | 3,980measured | 15 hours |
| /7407 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC | 9225 minutes – 4 days old | 6,390 views ~546 reactions | 60 minutes: 1,357 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,678 interp. → 6.0 hours: 2,020 → 12 hours: 3,780 → 24 hours: 4,850 → 2 days: 5,520still climbing at last reading | 4,850measured | 9.1 hours |
| /7396 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC | 11625 minutes – 5 days old | 8,420 views ~585 reactions | 60 minutes: 1,457 interp. → 3.0 hours: 1,970 → 6.0 hours: 2,540 → 12 hours: 3,250 → 24 hours: 4,110 → 2 days: 6,910still climbing at last reading | 4,110measured | 24 hours |
| /7385 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC | 1371.7 hours – 6 days old | 9,410 views ~623 reactions | 3.0 hours: 2,080 → 6.0 hours: 2,620 → 12 hours: 3,450 → 24 hours: 4,590 → 2 days: 6,520still climbing at last reading | 4,590measured | 24 hours |
| /7374 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC | 430 minutes – 3.1 hours old | 2,240 views ~525 reactions | 60 minutes: 1,605 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,240still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 30 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✨ Start your NovaHub journey Looking for a tool or a different game? Make NovaHub a starting point for discovering apps. 👇 Tap Open NovaHub and start browsing.
🎉90❤63💯59🤩54👍53👏51🔥49😍45
🧭 Explore with curiosity Tools, games or digital services: what would you like to explore? Browse different apps on NovaHub and bring something fresh to your routine. 👇 Open NovaHub and see what catches your eye.
💯76👍63🤩62😍54❤52👏52🔥49🎉43
🔎 Choose what fits you Start with what you need, then check an app's features and terms. For paid services, review the price and rules before deciding to use them. 👇 Open NovaHub and explore an app that interests you.
👍73🎉56🙏55😁54🤩52💯50👏49❤47
Posted without readable text
❤44👍11💯10🆒6🙏5🐳4🫡4🎉2
🎮 Make room for play Ready for a different gaming experience? Browse games on NovaHub, learn how they work, and choose one that catches your interest. 👇 Tap Open NovaHub to explore games.
🙏94👍92👏77🤩77💯75😍66🔥55💘4
🛠️ Find a tool for your day What would you like to get done? Start with a task, explore the tools on NovaHub, and learn what they do before choosing one to try. 👇 Open NovaHub and explore your options.
😁91❤87👍72🔥68🙏59😍58💯57🤩46
🚀 Discover your next app NovaHub brings apps, tools, games and digital services together. Looking for a useful tool or a new way to unwind? Start exploring here. 👇 Tap Open NovaHub and find something that fits your day.
👍148🔥90🤩73🙏69🎉59💯57😍57😁56
🤝 Share a useful discovery Found an interesting app or tool? Share the NovaHub link with a friend and tell them what caught your eye. A little context makes a recommendation more helpful. 👇 Open NovaHub and find something worth sharing.
🎉117❤112👍93🙏72🔥66💯65😁65🤩56
📱 New here? Start exploring 1. Tap Open NovaHub below. 2. Browse the apps and find something interesting. 3. Read about its features and terms before trying it. Discover first, then choose what fits you.
👏128❤111👍105😍84🔥81🙏69🤩68🎉67
✨ Start your NovaHub journey Looking for a tool or a different game? Make NovaHub a starting point for discovering apps. 👇 Tap Open NovaHub and start browsing.
❤131🤩100👍97😍88🙏86🔥83🎉69👏66
🧭 Explore with curiosity Tools, games or digital services: what would you like to explore? Browse different apps on NovaHub and bring something fresh to your routine. 👇 Open NovaHub and see what catches your eye.
🔥129👍103🙏98🤩91😍84❤83👏75🎉55
🔎 Choose what fits you Start with what you need, then check an app's features and terms. For paid services, review the price and rules before deciding to use them. 👇 Open NovaHub and explore an app that interests you.
🔥145👍123❤108🎉95🤩88👏82😍79🤗24
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @NovaHubChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 53 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nova Hub channel” (@NovaHubChannel), 1,068,883 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NovaHubChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.