چیزایی که کاش خیلی زودتر دربارهی مدیریـت مالــی یاد میگرفتم... 🦢🦢🦢🦢🦢🦢🦢🦢🦢🦢 ⠀ 𝖧𝖮𝖫𝖸─𝖥𝖮𝖱𝖢𝖤 🌟 #Development

Channel
𝖧𝖮𝖫𝖸 𝖥𝖮𝖱𝖢𝖤 ♥ توسعه فردی
@Holyfroce
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,022subscribers
+1,663 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002213299104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Holyfroce |
| Description | ᝡ 𝖠 𝗃𝗈ꭎ𝗋𝗇ᧉ𝗒 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 ˙𝖸𝗈ٌ𝗎𝗋˙ 𝖻𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝕤𝕖𝕝𝕗 ︵ جایی که دخترها یاد میگیرن خودشون رو بسازن 💋 🗼 #Mindset | 💄 #Beauty |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Holyfroce |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 27,022 | +182 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 26,840 | -31 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 26,871 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 26,895 | +23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 26,872 | +287 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 26,585 | +173 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 26,412 | -71 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 26,483 | +97 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:49 | 26,386 | +53 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:48 | 26,333 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:26 | 26,340 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 26,331 | -34 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 26,365 | -29 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 26,394 | +98 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 26,296 | +66 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 26,230 | -59 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 26,289 | +385 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 25,904 | +44 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 25,860 | +65 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 25,795 | first reading |
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.2%
- avg views ÷ 27,022 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,100
- 38 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 38
- of 101 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 101 (13 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 155,767 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 21:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 332
- Videos
- 46
- Links
- 239
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 19m 15s
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
‹ 𝑯𝘰𝘭𝘺 𝑭𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 › ❀ #video
𝒢IRLS 𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐊 🤩 لازم نیست هر پیامی که میاد رو همون لحظه جواب بدی، گاهی واقعاً حوصله نداری، سرت شلوغه، یا اصلاً نمیدونی چی باید بگی؛ اشکالی نداره بذاریش برای بعد. الان نمیتونم جواب کاملیه، قرار نیست همیشه آنلاین باشی و برای همه وقت داشته باشی.
‹ 𝑯𝘰𝘭𝘺 𝑭𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 › ❀ #video
پادکستایی برای مستقل شدن که ارزش گوش دادن دارن! استقلال فقط قوی بودن نیست بلکه بخشی ازش اینه که پولتو بفهمی، خودتو بشناسی، برای کارت برنامه داشته باشی و بتونی روی تصمیمهای خودت بایستی. 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 01- پول شناسی برای سواد مالی، مدیریت پول و شناخت رفتارهای مالی، اپیزود «مدیریت مالی شخصی» هم دقیقاً درباره برنامهریزی مالیه. 02. فرایاد برای خودشناسی و روانشناسی، اپیزود زنان خودساخته، آرتمیس هم مشخصاً درباره استقلال …
𝒢IRLS 𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐊 🤩 تا حالا شده کل روز درگیر باشی، ولی شب که میرسه حس کنی هیچ کاری نکردی؟ خیلی وقتا مشکل کمکاری نیست؛ ذهنت همزمان درگیر چندتا چیز مختلفه. پیامها، کارهای نصفه، چندتا فکر که هی برمیگردن توی سرت... قبل از اینکه فردا لیست کارهات رو بنویسی، یه کم ازش کم کن و دونه دونه پیش برو یعنی یه کار رو تموم کن و همهچی رو همزمان جلو نبر.
Posted without readable text
‹ 𝑯𝘰𝘭𝘺 𝑭𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 › ❀ #video
🖤 🎀𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗒 𝖢𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗄 اگه تازه ورزش رو شروع کردی و بعد از یه مدت کوتاه توی آینه تغییر واضحی نمیبینی، این به معنی ورزش کردنت تاثیری نداشته نبوده بلکه اوایلِ تمرین، بخشی از پیشرفت میتونه مربوط به چیزهایی مثل بهتر شدن هماهنگی حرکات، قدرت و استقامت باشه؛ تغییرات ظاهری هم معمولاً به زمان، نوع تمرین، تغذیه و شرایط بدن بستگی دارن پس خودتو فقط با آینه قضاوت نکن.پیشرفت رو با عملکردت بسنج، نه فقط ظاهرت.
│ 𝖩𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖳𝗂𝗆𝖾 ,, ژورنال نویسی│ سوال : این روزها بیشتر دارم برای چیزی تلاش میکنم که واقعاً میخوام، یا چیزی که فکر میکنم باید بخوام؟ چرا باید به این سوال جواب بدی؟ گاهی انقدر درگیر باید ها میشیم که یادمون میره اصلاً خودمون چی میخواستیم. قبل از اینکه برای هدف بعدیت برنامه بریزی، ببین این هدف واقعاً مال خودته یا از مقایسه، توقع خانواده، دوستا یا فضای مجازی اومده. ⠀ 𝖧𝖮𝖫𝖸─𝖥𝖮𝖱𝖢𝖤
‹ 𝑯𝘰𝘭𝘺 𝑭𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 › ❀ #video
𝒢IRLS 𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐊 🤩 یه وقتایی یه چیزی رو از خودت میخوای، ولی هنوز حاضر نیستی مثل اون آدم رفتار کنی. مثلاً میگی میخوام مستقل باشم ولی برای هر تصمیم کوچیک منتظر تأیید بقیهای یا میگی میخوام اعتمادبهنفس داشته باشم ولی هر کاری رو فقط وقتی انجام میدی که مطمئن باشی خرابش نمیکنی. شاید بعضی وقتا لازم نیست بیشتر فکر کنی؛ فقط باید یه بار، مثل همون آدمی که میخوای بشی رفتار کنی.
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @Holyfroce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Holyfroce edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@intelyoutube · 14,863#1
@xoxoaesthetic · 29,033#2
@lilithianglamour · 13,880#3
@stargirlmoniiii · 13,865#4
@makxxeupp · 4,876#5
@makupdior · 4,335#6
@meowgelic · 2,748#7
@limofit7 · 13,182#8
@Cottageidens · 9,124#9
@Garden_pretty · 23,017#10
@tarot3ea · 3,128#11
@Orphicology · 11,023#12
@youremyscenery · 3,833#13
@iliya_yousfzadeh · 4,112#14
@sourett · 5,781#15
@kimiko_english · 12,550#16
@hawlsu · 10,699#17
@marigl1 · 1,673#18
@urbodyandfaceOMG · 20,344#19
@Az_Tehrann · 821#20
@writtenby_t · 2,780#21
@libraryVellichor · 32,190#22
@saceura · 6,232#23
@backtothehome · 10,252#24
@Girls_togirl · 2,330#25
@lltohill · 4,872#26
@toolboxguk · 5,577#27
@whitecatwi · 3,237#28
@thememakeup · 1,219#29
@plutonblue · 7,272#30
@rooom505 · 11,618#31
@jabe_sabzeman · 2,248#32
@sama_dailyart · 12,715#33
@MakeYourCharacter · 1,296#34
@lana12345678910lana · 13,561#35
@herwonderland · 191,894#36
@fdstvzip · 3,117#37
@RoseberryGirl · 4,535#38
@regimekimfit · 15,165#39
@lC3LE · 8#40
@sleepy3tar · 8,240#41
@gaamtu · 1,854#42
@Themecore · 144,618#43
@vogueistic · 8,587#44
@purevibes_only · 7,384#45
@evilspiris · 13,941#46
@MNIOcean · 7,521#47
@taravat_text · 1,143#48
@sp4luv · 21,002#49
@bollaland · 27,305#50
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#51
@blcd91 · 2,936#52
@TH3EME · 217,955#53
@qill3o · 12,051#54
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@jafekriipadcast · 20,913
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 25 September 2026
@Garden_pretty · 23,017
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 September 2026
@xoxoaesthetic · 29,033
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
@goddesses_world · 27,725
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
@libraryVellichor · 32,190
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 5 September 2026
@lfittimel · 22,852
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 September 2026
@RAMONA_HE · 26,143
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
@Bookloverss_ir · 33,945
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
@varzesh_ba_raaghs · 70,071
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
@marinaachannel · 28,375
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
@Wonderful_mind98 · 31,038
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 6 September 2026
@khatzendgii · 32,024
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
@malakesho · 86,178
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 31 August 2026
@Voguechnll · 299,300
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 August 2026
@fitshouo · 20,678
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 September 2026
@ABRAK_KHANOM · 24,888
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 September 2026
@Pink_bowtie · 42,998
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
@luxury_baash · 86,979
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
@herwonderland · 191,894
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
@bio_angizeshi1 · 20,765
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
@selfesteem2021 · 20,798
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 September 2026
@Afsoon_subliminals · 41,969
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 August 2026
@ideZibaye · 94,486
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 16 August 2026
@tazin_sofree · 46,763
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖧𝖮𝖫𝖸 𝖥𝖮𝖱𝖢𝖤 ♥ توسعه فردی” (@Holyfroce), 27,022 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Holyfroce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.