Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

روانشناسی سیاه ـ اورفـیـکـلـوژیـ ׅ ࣪𓏲ּ ֶָ

@Orphicology

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,037subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002050441150
TypeChannel
Username@Orphicology
Descriptionخودت نباش ✔️ روانشناسی مرموز و مسحور کننده فراتر از درک معمولی ناشناس http://t.me/Orphicologybot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Orphicology

Growth

11,03711,09311,0657 August 2026 — 11,093 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,093 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,082 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,075 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,058 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,064 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,048 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,037 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,029–11,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:0911,037-11
12 Aug 2026, 15:4311,048-16
11 Aug 2026, 18:4111,064+6
10 Aug 2026, 20:3411,058-17
9 Aug 2026, 17:0211,075-7
8 Aug 2026, 16:0411,082-11
7 Aug 2026, 18:0111,093no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5211,093first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 11,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held45 (26 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total43,723
Reactions total1,513
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
36
Videos
1
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,513 reactions across 39 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋39025.8%
👍29219.3%
🆒16510.9%
❤‍🔥15310.1%
🎅1228.06%
🤣845.55%
💘724.76%
🙏714.69%
🍓704.63%
🍌241.59%
🐳100.661%
🗿100.661%
👎90.595%
🍾70.463%
😭70.463%
💯50.33%
😈40.264%
😨40.264%
🤡40.264%
🎄30.198%
5 further kinds70.463%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,513reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTCviews —

روانشناسی سیاه ـ اورفـیـکـلـوژیـ ׅ ࣪𓏲ּ ֶָ pinned a photo

13 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC617 views53 reactionsread 15 August 2026

تکنیک‌های ارتباطی و اثرگذاری وونیونگ : 👀 کنترل داستان ( narrative control ) یکی از قوی‌ترین تکنیک‌هاش اینه که اجازه نمی‌ده سؤال، حتماً قاب جواب رو تعیین کنه. مثال: «تا حالا شکست خوردی؟» جواب: «نه، هنوز جوونم.» سؤال درباره‌ی شکست بود. جواب درباره‌ی زمان و آینده شد. یعنی: QUESTION FRAME ↓ REINTERPRETATION ↓ NEW FRAME به جای دفاع کردن: «نه، من شکست نخوردم چون...» اصلاً وارد اون قاب نمی‌شه. 👀تبدیل یک نقطه

❤‍🔥40🆒4🍌2🍓2🎄2💋2😈1

13 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTCviews —

روانشناسی سیاه ـ اورفـیـکـلـوژیـ ׅ ࣪𓏲ּ ֶָ pinned a photo

13 Aug 2026, 01:08 UTCviews —

روانشناسی سیاه ـ اورفـیـکـلـوژیـ ׅ ࣪𓏲ּ ֶָ pinned a photo

12 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC264 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ری اکت و نظر یادتون نره تکنیک های وونیونگ برای فردا

🍌13💋6🆒4🐳1

12 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC791 views69 reactionsread 15 August 2026

هسته‌ی شخصیتی و اختلال های وونیونگ : 👀 اعتمادبه‌نفس غیرمعمول و بالا ( self confidence ) یکی از واضح‌ترین چیزهایی که در حرف‌های وونیونگ دیده می‌شه، اعتماد خیلی بالاش به خودشه. مثلاً در مصاحبه‌ی Vogue Korea ازش پرسیدن: «تا حالا شکست خوردی؟» جوابش: «نه، هنوز جوونم.» این جواب خیلی جالبه. چون جواب معمول می‌تونست این باشه: «آره، شکست خوردم ولی ازش یاد گرفتم.» ولی اون اصلاً خودش رو در قالب «آدم شکست‌خورده» تعر

🆒53💋6💘3🍓2😈21🎅1🐳1

12 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC677 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

تحلیل کامل شخصیت jang wonyoung 🤩

🍓25🍾6🎅1🤗1

12 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC750 views35 reactionsread 15 August 2026

نه بخاطر معصومیت اتفاقا برعکس رنگ سفید پاک و معصوم بنظر میاد ولی پر از راز عه

👍29😨4🎅1💋1

12 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC754 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

وونیونگ وایب رنگ سفید رو میده.

👍21🎅1

12 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC428 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

امشب شخصیت وونیونگ تحلیل میکنم

👍9🙏3🗿2💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @Orphicology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

در مغزِ من چه میگذرد؟
@Avin_hastam · 222,157
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
پادچی | پادکست و کتاب صوتی
@podchi · 437,461
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روانشناسی سیاه ـ اورفـیـکـلـوژیـ ׅ ࣪𓏲ּ ֶָ” (@Orphicology), 11,037 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Orphicology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.