Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Holles-Brauch

@HolleBrauch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

429subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002159806377
TypeChannel
Username@HolleBrauch
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HolleBrauch

Growth

4294314306 August 2026 — 431 subscribers6 August 2026 — 431 subscribers13 August 2026 — 429 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 429–431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:08429-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:19431no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:48431first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.1%
avg views ÷ 429 subscribers
Avg views / post
219
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held18 (14 January 202630 July 2026)
Views total658
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10167.8%
2114.1%
🙏1510.1%
🔥117.38%
👍10.671%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC257 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/hollesbrauch/p/opfermoor-and-the-diana-of-wurzburg?r=1ttt2g&utm_medium=ios

9

29 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC191 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I will be migrating this channel to Substack from here on out. You can follow Holles-Brauch here https://substack.com/@hollesbrauch/note/c-303831618?r=1ttt2g&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

🙏11

27 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC210 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @thechadpastoralist

As Wōden cultists, we are concerned with studying the theophany and divine nature of our highest god, Wōden. By extension this also includes the marriage between Wōden and His wife, Frīg, and understanding the divine associations of His sons. I recommend following both Þórr Siðr and Holles Brauch for these reasons. Þórr Siðr is a Þunor cultist highlighting a lot of useful knowledge about Wōden's son, Þunor, primaril

17

21 Mar 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,850 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Frau Holle by Pennsylvanian German Folk artist Benjamin Rader

31

20 Mar 2026, 00:17 UTC755 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The epithet “Hold/Holda” was first documented by Burchard of worms in the 9th century “Canon Episcopi” : "Have you believed there is some female, whom the stupid vulgar call Holda [Holdam] who is able to do a certain thing, such that those deceived by the devil affirm themselves by necessity and by command to be required to do, that is, with a crowd of demons transformed into the likeness of women, on fixed nights to

161

4 Mar 2026, 20:50 UTC780 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

A German Peasant is graced by Fraa Berchta on her eve. - commissioned by Brother Bjorn

305👍1

1 Mar 2026, 00:32 UTC≈1,420 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Perchta/Berchta masks used in seasonal processions depicting both the “hag and divine mother” accepts. These masked are common in Swabia, Switzerland and Bavaria.

🔥11🙏4

21 Feb 2026, 17:00 UTC473 viewsread 6 August 2026

This next tale comes from the town of Waldeck, located at the "Edersee" lake in the north of the German state of Hesse, Germany. The town was named after the no longer existing county of Waldeck, whose counts can be traced back to ca. 1100. “ Unfortunately, in our days they have long since disappeared, but much earlier in Waldeck, more precisely, in a wooded, well-hidden valley between the villages Braunsen and Volkh

21 Feb 2026, 16:55 UTC532 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The “Keenichn auf Himmel” is not without her holy retinue of servants who carry out her will and commands, who punish those that break her laws and reward the others that uphold them. Among these servants are the saligen/ saligenfrau (blissful ones or blissful woman) who throughout the lands of our ancestors are known by other names such as weissefrau or hollen yet all bearing the same qualities. That is; beautiful

5

16 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC679 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

A depiction of one of the turf altars of opfermoor in Germany. This location was believed to have been an early cult site dating from the Hallstatt period to the early medieval period with offerings as recent as the 16th century conducted by local farmers. This location was dedicated to an earthly mother whom many believed became Holle. Credit to Iwobrand

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HolleBrauch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 868,325 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Holles-Brauch” (@HolleBrauch), 429 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HolleBrauch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.