Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Will of Gaut

@willofgaut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,257subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001154144019
TypeChannel
Username@willofgaut
Created27 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/willofgaut

Growth

1,2571,2591,2586 Aug 2026, 09:56 — 1,259 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:51 — 1,259 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:53 — 1,257 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:566 Aug 2026, 18:53
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,257–1,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:531,257-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:511,259no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:561,259first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 1,257 subscribers
Avg views / post
389
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (19 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total7,006
Reactions total256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

256 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14857.8%
6224.2%
❤‍🔥176.64%
👍145.47%
🙏93.52%
🔥62.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC238 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Interesting hymnal like intepretation of Galdr using ALU. https://substack.com/@theodishbelief/note/p-204345775?r=1jtbi5

2

5 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC127 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @survivethejivePhoto

Clovis kneels to Wotan

12

2 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC203 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @thechadpastoralist

On 21st-Century Civilizational Decay It's astounding when degenerates attempt to ingratiate themselves in unique European history communities and broadly "political" spheres online. They do so under the guise of senseless, mindless, moronic hatred of other races - as well as grasping on to the will to life enjoyers of history that appreciate the traditional civilizational values we inherit from our ancestors - and b

10🔥32

2 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC223 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @otakuguruPhoto

The latest Mana game 聖剣伝説 has a job class call Rune knight. The armor has Runic engraved trimmings and the waist sash has a Mjölnir. Hail the Aesir and Vanir!

9

1 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC216 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hammerandvajraPhoto

A bit of additional information. Ragnar was a devout Odinist until death.

133🙏1

31 Jul 2026, 03:43 UTC212 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hammerandvajraPhoto

Seeing young, fighting age Moroccans (mostly Muslim) flood Spain is enraging. It's sad that many Christian in the West care more about what happens in the middle east than in Europe. Spain needs a reconquista.

👍135🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC300 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hammerandvajraPhoto

They all claim this. It's a part of their apologetics. It's a Christian form of Taqiyya. Intentional lies to slander and trick people into converting. Rarely were these people any form of Heathen, Pagan, Buddhist, or of alternative spirtuality whatsoever. If anything they "larped" politically and moved on when they had pressures or felt it was unpopular at the time. Usually they are lying. Lying for slander to try t

16🙏1

27 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC317 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @thechadpastoralist

As Wōden cultists, we are concerned with studying the theophany and divine nature of our highest god, Wōden. By extension this also includes the marriage between Wōden and His wife, Frīg, and understanding the divine associations of His sons. I recommend following both Þórr Siðr and Holles Brauch for these reasons. Þórr Siðr is a Þunor cultist highlighting a lot of useful knowledge about Wōden's son, Þunor, primaril

17🙏1

26 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC328 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @GermanicFaith

Our Gods never left us, we left them and must find our way back as a people. Simple as.

16

26 Jul 2026, 04:22 UTC295 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sagnamadrPhoto

You know who did renounce love for power? Fáfnir. Wagner had Alberich more explicitly renounce love, which he inferred from the fact that with Fáfnir, his greed and pursuit of wealth for the sake of wealth ends with him perched on a heap of gold in a cave…alone. In the Hrómundar saga Gripssonar, king Þráinn spends his life pursuing wealth and power, and willingly becomes a draugr to protect it. Before he’s slain by

10👍1

25 Jul 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,290 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Oðinn doesn't renounce or betray Frigga.

27

24 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC274 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sagnamadrPhoto

Is the Hárbarðr in the Hárbarðsljóð Odin or Loki in disguise? Hárbarðr accuses Sif of being unfaithful, as Loki does every Goddess in the Lokasenna, attempting to sow doubt and division amongst his enemies. Odin is attested as Hárbarðr in the Grímnismál; there could be a lesson there about Jötnar disguising themselves as Gods, evil disguising itself as good, to infiltrate society and spread degeneracy, perhaps he e

103

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @willofgaut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 281,323 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Will of Gaut” (@willofgaut), 1,257 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/willofgaut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.