Channel
@Hiich_estan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
686subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001530561173 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Hiich_estan |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Hiich_estan |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 686 | +7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 679 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 681 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 682 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 677 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 674 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 657 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 657 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
323 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 179 | 55.4% | |
| 👍 | 72 | 22.3% | |
| 💔 | 25 | 7.74% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 4.64% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 3.41% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 2.79% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.55% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.55% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"دگرگونی بزرگ" کارل پولانی هم کتاب قابل توجه و مفیدیه که اخیراً فرصتی شد تا بررسیش کنم. نگارنده با استفاده از استقراء تاریخی سعی در اثبات این نکته داره که نهاد "بازار خودتنظیمگر" نه یک نظم طبیعی (که تصور میشود تنها با مصونماندن از شرّ مداخلهی اغیار، کار خودش را میکند)، بلکه پدیدهایست که شکلگیری و برپا ماندنش محصول و مستلزم مهندسی و مداخلهای سنگین از جانب دولت بوده. و نهایتاً با صورتبندی مفهوم "جنبش مضاعف"…
❤7
پ.ن: بهسبب سختخوان بودن کتاب، اگر هم به موضوع علاقهمندید و هم حوصلهی کلنجار رفتن با متن بدفهم را ندارید، پیشنهاد میکنم به شرح صوتی خود مترجم رجوع کنید.
❤7
زیارت اربعین سیدالشهدا(ع)
❤10
أَلَمْ تَرَ كَيْفَ فَعَلَ رَبُّكَ بِعَادٍ (۶) آیا ندیدی پروردگارت با قوم «عاد» چه کرد؟! إِرَمَ ذَاتِ الْعِمَادِ (۷) و با آن شهر «اِرَم» باعظمت، الَّتِي لَمْ يُخْلَقْ مِثْلُهَا فِي الْبِلَادِ (۸) همان شهری که مانندش در شهرها آفریده نشده بود! وَثَمُودَ الَّذِينَ جَابُوا الصَّخْرَ بِالْوَادِ (۹) و قوم «ثمود» که صخرههای عظیم را از درّه میبریدند [و از آن خانه و کاخ میساختند]! وَفِرْعَوْنَ ذِي الْأَوْتَادِ (۱۰) و فرعونی…
❤26
- چرا با افرادی مواجه میشویم که به حقانیت نظراتشان اعتقاد دارند، اما باز هم سکوت میکنند؟ نظریهی ارتباطی مشهوری تحت عنوان "مارپیچ سکوت" اینطور استدلال میکنه که هراس ما از انزوای اجتماعی، یکی از بنیادینترین متغیرهای شکلدهنده به رفتار ماست و به تبع همین امر، دائماً درحال رصد فضای پیرامون خودمون هستیم تا تشخیص بدیم چه ایدههایی بر فضای جامعه "غالب"اند. اگر نظر خودمان را در اقلیت بیابیم، سکوت را بر پرداخت هزی…
👍11❤6
يابن أمي جارت الدنيا علينا يا أخي إنّا من الأسر أتينا لست أدري... أين خدري؟ بالأسى والحزن نادت... زينب والدمع جاري سيدي أفديك مطروحاً... على الرمضاء عاري هدم الأعداء مذ... فارقت یا رجواي داري
❤11
سراپا اگر زرد و پژمردهایم ولی دل به پاییز نسپردهایم چو گلدان خالی، لب پنجره پُر از خاطرات ترک خوردهایم اگر داغ دل بود، ما دیدهایم اگر خون دل بود، ما خوردهایم اگر دل دلیل است، آوردهایم اگر داغ شرط است، ما بردهایم اگر دشنهی دشمنان، گردنیم! اگر خنجر دوستان، گردهایم! گواهی بخواهید، اینک گواه: همین زخمهایی که نشمردهایم! دلی سربلند و سری سر به زیر از این دست عمری به سر بردهایم _ قیصر امینپور
❤18💔3
برای دوستان بیخواب و آشفته
❤7🔥2😭2
جداً موجب تعجبه که این گزاره هنوز هم از سمت اصحاب آکادمی کشور، تکرار میشه. یعنی عجیببودنش از این نظره که صرفاً دیتای خام رو بیان میکنه و هیچ تحلیل ساختاری و بررسی علّت-معلولیای درش انجام نمیده. مسئله چندان سخت نیست: درسته که آمریکا خودش بزرگترین تولیدکنندهی نفته، اما در عین حال یکی از بزرگترین مصرفکنندگان هم هست؛ به این صورت که صنایع راهبردی آمریکا، از خودروسازی و فولاد و پتروشیمی و هواپیماسازی و کشاورزی …
👍14❤2🤔1
"اما ای سراینده از محبوب من! بدان که به لبهای کسی که نام او را میبرد حسادت میکنم"
🥰9
اخیراً دیدم که ویدیوهایی با موضوع نقد مرحوم علی شریعتی و شیّاد دونستن ایشون وایرال میشن و سوالاتی رو برای دوستان به وجود میارن. لذا سعی میکنم نکتهای رو بطور مختصر در اینباره بنویسم. قبل از هر نقد و بررسیای، باید به سراغ پیشزمینهها و علل شکلگیری افکار و دغدغههای یک متفکر برویم. مثلاً درنظر داشته باشیم که یکی از مهمترین و تاثیرگذارترین مولفهها دربارهی شریعتی، همینه که ایشان تجدّد غربی رو در کسوت یک زیستجه…
👍11❤3🤔2😁1😱1
اینجاست که میگن رفیق خوب، تمام ماجراست.
❤23😭4💔3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Hiich_estan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شیخ شطّاح” (@Hiich_estan), 686 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hiich_estan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.