Жир
custom 60327678262493867539custom 52201536830644049424

Channel
@Helikontexrus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
19,413subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001851311958 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Helikontexrus |
| Description | Helikon-Tex® Russia / "HTR" Гуманитарный проект по заказу экипировки со всего мира, без наценок перекупов и барыг! Как заказать: https://t.me/Helikontexrus/3032 Основатель: @ForwardBlack88 РКН: https://clck.ru/3GZZPz |
| Created | 6 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Helikontexrus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 19,413 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 19,409 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 19,407 | +18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 19,389 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 19,391 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 19,392 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 19,395 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 19,396 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 19,396 | first reading |
85 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 84 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 85 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 248,386 |
| Reactions total | 5,160 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,160 reactions across 84 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5336824433845742459 | 1,950 | 37.8% | |
| custom 5855054367442341245 | 798 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5220153683064404942 | 395 | 7.66% | |
| custom 5197267593345385327 | 366 | 7.09% | |
| 💯 | 319 | 6.18% | |
| custom 6032767826249386753 | 273 | 5.29% | |
| custom 5253931672407140998 | 272 | 5.27% | |
| custom 5217466996337165348 | 164 | 3.18% | |
| 🏆 | 108 | 2.09% | |
| custom 5292255837388026184 | 101 | 1.96% | |
| custom 5422538735394766352 | 99 | 1.92% | |
| custom 5298561248810525320 | 69 | 1.34% | |
| custom 5431612996268881785 | 50 | 0.969% | |
| custom 6327801039755937403 | 47 | 0.911% | |
| custom 5278571612021478092 | 41 | 0.795% | |
| custom 5285131822378811157 | 34 | 0.659% | |
| custom 5832195314542447730 | 32 | 0.62% | |
| custom 5368641268106696299 | 15 | 0.291% | |
| custom 5373028048918565549 | 10 | 0.194% | |
| custom 5348037098806987487 | 9 | 0.174% | |
| 3 further kinds | 8 | 0.155% |
Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Жир
custom 60327678262493867539custom 52201536830644049424
Формат
custom 58550543674423412455
#Приход Забыл, Рурок еще!
custom 519726759334538532716
#Приход Ну и 5.11 на последок!
custom 522015368306440494214
#Приход Килыч
custom 522015368306440494215custom 58550543674423412452
#Приход Еще тема
custom 603276782624938675319
#Приход Мре с ибея если что
custom 522015368306440494221
Video, posted without a caption
custom 533682443384574245936custom 52539316724071409987custom 60327678262493867535custom 58550543674423412454
#Приход Вайб wrmfzy.com
custom 522015368306440494220custom 58550543674423412456custom 51972675933453853274
#Приход Ба
custom 522015368306440494216custom 54225387353947663525custom 63278010397559374033custom 58550543674423412452
Красотень ❤️
custom 522015368306440494238custom 54225387353947663528custom 58550543674423412456custom 52985612488105253202custom 63278010397559374032custom 53368244338457424591
Смотрю я на плиты агилайт которые вышли в 25к и думаю. Насколько надо быть опущенной и обиженной шлюхой, чтобы рекламить альферова с плитами по 60-100к лишь из за того, что "марик плохой". Ну вы и дауны ска)))
💯56custom 533682443384574245924🏆7custom 52985612488105253203custom 53480370988069874871
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @Helikontexrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как перестать быть п#здатым и спускать деньги на крутую снарягу???
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 28,916 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ʜᴇʟɪᴋᴏɴ-ᴛᴇx ʀᴜssɪᴀ®” (@Helikontexrus), 19,413 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Helikontexrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.