Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Большой Панда

@bigbattlepanda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

22,601subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001253633773
TypeChannel
Username@bigbattlepanda
DescriptionЧат 👇🐼 https://t.me/+GsWa_CBTV0E4NTd Помощь проекту: Сбер 2202203267573634
Created4 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bigbattlepanda

Growth

22,58922,61122,6006 August 2026 — 22,611 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,608 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,606 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,596 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,600 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,589 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,593 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,601 subscribers22,6016 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,586–22,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:2422,601+8
11 Aug 2026, 18:5822,593+4
10 Aug 2026, 18:2122,589-11
9 Aug 2026, 17:2222,600+4
8 Aug 2026, 16:2622,596-10
7 Aug 2026, 15:5222,606-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:1022,608-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:5222,611first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 22,601 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,980
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held63 (3 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total250,638
Reactions total5,722
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16,200
Videos
3,420
Links
1,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 08s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,976 reactions across 52 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁98719.8%
🔥87117.5%
💯50210.1%
👍4509.04%
🤔3897.82%
2785.59%
2474.96%
🤣2204.42%
🫡1422.85%
👏1332.67%
😨1272.55%
🤯811.63%
🤷‍♂711.43%
🤝681.37%
😈591.19%
😢581.17%
😱571.15%
👻531.07%
😍480.965%
🥰430.864%
10 further kinds921.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,722reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 63 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bigbattlepanda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC558 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Очередная находка, теперь под Брестом, где мужчина разбирал погреб и нашел пистолет 1944 года. Житель Жабинковского района сносил недавно купленный старый дом. Во время разборки погреба он обнаружил спрятанный в земле пистолет и сообщил о находке в милицию. Экспертиза установила, что это советский пистолет Тульского Токарева (ТТ), выпущенный в 1944 году. Несмотря на возраст, оружие хорошо сохранилось и оказалось пр

😨21🤔10💯5😭4👍1

13 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,230 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Истории с Minimi продолжаются: оружие заклинило во время стрельбы, разобрать его не удалось, по этому пришлось использовать молоток чтобы вытащить застрявший газовый поршень. Во время интенсивной стрельбы газовый поршень нагрелся настолько, что его повело и он начал деформироваться. Скорее всего причина в браке изготовления детали или выборе материала. Либо это общая усталость металла вызванная регулярным перепадом т

15😨9🤔5💯1

13 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,820 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, Панды Вепрь-КМ, с прикладом "Жуков" от Magpul и цевьё того же производителя - у меня аж олдскулы свело! Это сейчас есть огромное количество вариантов модификации, а лет 10-12 назад это была топовая сборка, лучшее что можно купить за деньги. Еще бы газовую трубку "Ultimack" и старенький Aimpoint на нее и было бы максимально аутентично 👌 А вообще цены были такими, что тюнинг был увлечением богатых, по этом

💯34😍8👍7🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈2,380 views90 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Очередной видеоролик с примером покраски оружия через трафарет #pandadialog #pandavideo

🥰41👍35🔥74👎1🤔1😨1

12 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,520 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Братишки артиллеристы передают привет хохлам от меня и всех подписчиков канала #pandadialog #pandavideo

🔥2916🫡7🤝5👍4🤨1

12 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈2,560 views80 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Возможные варианты магазинов к АК под патрон 5,45х39. Кажется в коллекции чего-то не хватает #pandadialog #pandaphoto

🔥51🤔15💯7👍43

12 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈2,700 views60 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Давно у нас не было интересных, занимательных видео из Солнечной Бразилии Так вот, убийца как и положено убийцам в Латинской Америке приехал на мотоцикле в бар где отдыхала его жертва. Он не стал церемониться, зашёл и расстрелял его в упор. Правда попутно он убил девушку которая оказалась не в том месте, не в то время и не с тем парнем в компании. В общем сюжет "мамочка, я полюбила бандита" закончился закономерно

🔥33😱203👏2🌚1😈1

12 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈2,660 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Рубрика RASPIDORASILO И щелевой пламегаситель не выдержал интенсивного автоматического огня на коротком стволе под патрон 7,62х39. А потому что нужно читать техническую документацию к изделию, прежде чем запускать копийное производство и не жадничать при выборе материала #pandadialog #pandavideo

🤗28💯15🤷‍♂4🤝2😱21

12 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈2,790 views68 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Уровень прожарки? #pandadialog #pandaphoto

🔥50😍8😨8💯2

12 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC≈2,810 views56 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, Панды Проснулся сегодня с мыслью, что таки надо пильнуть трубу приклада на "Шурике", сантиметров на 5-7. Общая длина изделия 805 миллиметров, длина ствола 305 миллиметров, по закону 300/700 у меня есть 10 сантиметров запаса и я буду в пределах действующего законодательства. Можно конечно купить короткую трубу - но душит жаба #pandaphoto #pandadialog

🔥33🤔15💯4😍3👍1

11 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC≈3,180 views88 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика #пушкидрузей и Вован забрал таки сегодня АКВ. Как он его забирал и что мне для этого пришлось пережить [булинг, угрозы, психологическое насилие и прочее] это отдельная история. Сейчас Вован привез карабин домой, почистил этот "SIG по русски" и весьма доволен приобретением. Во первых ствол с восьмым твистом, то есть по идее тяжелые пули, особенно дозвук будет лететь просто прекрасно. Ствол насколько я понял че

🔥61😍135👍5🤔2😨2

11 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈4,400 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Наши камрады провели самостоятельный отстрел бронеплит Atlant Armor третьего класса защиты Отстрел проводили 1) 5,45х39 ПС 2) 7,62х54 ЛПС Дистанция 100м Пробития на обоих выстрелах отсутствуют можно сказать, что изделие выдержало. Пользователи обращают внимание на весьма низкий вес изделия. После отстрела я обратился к производителю и получил следующий комментарий: "...на практике для уверенной остановки автоматно

🔥3415👍43🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @bigbattlepanda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 10,250 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

АО-62 (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…|номер=9 (72) |страницы=30—34 |issn=0201-7121}} == Ссылки == * https://t.me/bigbattlepanda/14590 {{Asrifle-stub}} {{Пехотное оружие СССР и России}}…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Большой Панда” (@bigbattlepanda), 22,601 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigbattlepanda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.