Channel
@Hasans_cow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
203subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001234761286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Hasans_cow |
| Description | کسی را که انديشه ناخوش بود بدان ناخوشی رای او گش بود همی خويشتن را چليپا کند به پيش خردمند رسوا کند (گش=بد، زشت به تحقیق دکتر علی رواقی) حسابم پاک شد و کانال @hasandalehsdog نادسترس این کانال را ساختم تا کانون وکلای یوگی و دوستان بی کانال نباشد |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 14 November 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Hasans_cow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 203 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 203 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 November 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
دوباره متولد شدی اما اینجا نیستی... بزان بع بع کنان مست چرا هستند و گاه به چمنزاری تازه می رسند و از شادی دوجفتی بپر بپر میکنند... لاکپشت های خندان و دانا در جستجوی سیاره های جذابتر برای زندگی به انتگرال گیری و آزمایشات مشغول اند... و ما طلب مغفرت از رفتگان داریم...
Signed دادفر
آن قصر که جمشید در او جام گرفت آهو بچه کرد و روبه آرام گرفت بهرام که گور می گرفتی همه عمر دیدی که چگونه گور بهرام گرفت (ریاضی دان، منجم، فیلسوف، و شاعر ایرانی ۴۳۹ه ق)
Signed دادفر
اگر این درنده خویی ز طبیعتت بمیرد، همه عمر زنده باشی به روان آدمیت.(شیخ اجل، سعدی)
Signed دادفر
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If it remains inactive in the next 20 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If it remains inactive in the next 27 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
چرایی مخالفت با برگزاری آزمون مرکز مشاوران قوه قضاییه من گمانم محور اعتراض پذیرش کارآموز در حد ظرفیت تاکنونی کانون ها است اگر قانون گذار تبصره ماده یک قانون کیفیت را تصویب کرده و اگر کمیسیون موضوع آن تبصره پیوسته ظرفیت کمابیش ثابتی را پذیرفته است، افزایش این ظرفیت چه توسط مرکز مشاوران قوه قضاییه چه در کمیسیون تعیین ظرفیت تبصره ماده یک قانون کیفیت برای ما پذیرفتنی نیست. ما برای تداوم معیشت خود نیازمند هستیم سطح پذی…
Signed دادفر
حالا که بیخواب شدم اینم بگم. دکتر علی رستمی در درس حقوق مالیه عمومی چند بار فرمودند همه چیز از مشروطه آغاز شده. دکتر طجرلو هم دیروز فرمود ایران تا مشروطه چیزی نداشت و از آن زمان آغاز کردند به ترجمه قوانین بیگانه و .... این سخن را بسیاری از حقوقدانان دادفر در گروه های مجازی هم گفته اند. دیروز به دکتر طجرلو معترضانه گفتم در حیات پیامبر اسلام مردم از گرانی بهای کالاها به تنگ آمدند. رفتند پیش پیامبر اکرم و درخواست کرد…
Signed دادفر
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed دادفر
آیا به نظر شما دختر ۱۰ ساله نیاز به نگهداری و حضانت دارد؟
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed دادفر
اگر این کانال بخواهد خودش را نابود کند آیا هیچ روباتی هست دلش بسوزد و جلوی رویش بایستد؟ یا همگی شان خودفروخته ی الگوریتمها هستند؟
Signed دادفر
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If it remains inactive in the next 8 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hasans_cow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
آیا به نظر شما دختر ۱۰ ساله نیاز به نگهداری و حضانت دارد؟
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2019 to 15 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,218,651 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Hasans_cow named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گاو حسن چه جوره” (@Hasans_cow), 203 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hasans_cow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.