Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ХАР АЭРОБИК КРИЙЯ

Channel

ХАР АЭРОБИК КРИЙЯ

@HarAerobic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004360876094
TypeChannel
Username@HarAerobic
Description🌊 ХАР АЭРОБИК КРИЙЯ Утренний ритуал для тех, кто создаёт и развивается. 21 день. 3 минуты практики для энергии, ясности и состояния силы ✨
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 14 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HarAerobic

Growth

2211 Aug 2026, 21:20 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:2011 Aug 2026, 21:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:3022no change
11 Aug 2026, 21:2022first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.4%
avg views ÷ 22 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.5
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total135
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
5
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1h 04m
Average length
16m 12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥940.9%
627.3%
🙏313.6%
🥰313.6%
🤗14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC8 viewsread 11 August 2026

Дорогие! 🤍 Уже завтра стартует наше «Ресурсное утро». ✨ Если вы всё ещё сомневались, сегодня — тот самый день, когда можно успеть запрыгнуть в последний вагон. 🌿 И у меня для всех участниц есть подарок. 🎁 Подробности уже рассказала здесь. Буду очень рада провести эти 10 дней вместе с вами. Начнём август с заботы о себе, новых привычек и ресурса. 🤍

25 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сат Нам, дорогие! ❤️ Хочу поделиться с вами новостью. 27 июля в 19:00 (МСК) Владлена Малыгина вместе с астропсихологом Татьяной Гарус проведут эфир на очень интересную тему: 🌙 «Секреты лунной кухни: почему именно эта еда успокаивает именно тебя?» Мне самой очень любопытно, поэтому я тоже обязательно буду смотреть. 😊 А ещё это отличная возможность познакомиться с Владленой поближе. Уже совсем скоро мы вместе запу

🙏1

23 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Друзья, наш марафон закончился. ❤️ Но я до сих пор ловлю себя на том, что в 7 утра мысленно встречаюсь с вами. За эти три недели мы создали привычку начинать день с себя. И мне очень захотелось её сохранить. Именно поэтому родился новый проект. С 1 августа вместе с нутрициологом Владленой Малыгиной мы запускаем 10-дневное «Ресурсное утро». Если ХАР помогал начать день с правильного состояния, то теперь мы хотим

3

22 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌊 День 2️⃣2️⃣— сделано ✔️ Признавайтесь... 😄 Кто сегодня утром, уже без моего напоминания, сделал привычные ХАР! ХАР! ХАР!? Я сделала. И знаете, это, наверное, лучший итог нашего марафона. Марафон закончился. А привычка осталась. И если сегодня утром вы сами захотели выйти на коврик — это очень хороший знак. Значит, эти 21 день были не просто марафоном. Они стали началом чего-то нового. Поэтому не останавлив

🔥3

20 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

Сегодня 20-й день нашего марафона. И знаете, что меня больше всего радует? Что многие из вас уже не думают: «Надо сделать практику». Вы просто приходите, потому что это стало частью утра. И именно в этот момент я поняла одну важную вещь. На самом деле мы с вами не просто делали ХАР. Мы учились начинать день с себя. С нескольких минут, которые потом меняют всё остальное. И мне очень хочется, чтобы это ощущение н

20 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

День 2️⃣0️⃣– сделано ✔️ ✨ Какое состояние после практики вы хотите взять с собой в этот день? 🌊 Хар энергия – мой выбор!

19 Jul 2026, 05:57 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🤍 А вы читали историю про Елену и Жана на основном канале? Сегодня у нас уже 19-й день. И мне стало интересно... Скажите честно, у кого-нибудь возникали мысли: «Ещё два дня — и я молодец! 💪🏻» А может быть, наоборот, вы уже перестали считать дни, и практика незаметно стала частью вашего утра? Какой бы ни был ваш ответ, мне хочется, чтобы вы запомнили одну мысль. Хар Аэробик Крийя — это не только марафон. Это

🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Дорогие мои! ❤️ У нас осталось всего 3 дня до окончания марафона. И сегодня я вдруг поймала себя на неожиданной мысли... Мне будет не хватать наших утренних ХАР. Этих пятнадцати минут, когда мы встречаемся ещё до того, как начнётся суета дня. Когда вместе дышим, двигаемся, настраиваемся. За эти три недели это стало чем-то гораздо большим, чем просто практика. Это стало нашим маленьким утренним ритуалом. И, чес

3

18 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026

День 1️⃣8️⃣– сделано ✔️ ✨ Какое состояние после практики вы хотите взять с собой в этот день? 🌊 Хар энергия – мой выбор!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HarAerobic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 776,161 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ХАР АЭРОБИК КРИЙЯ” (@HarAerobic), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HarAerobic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.