Channel
@Gradov_zen
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
390subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001177751433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Gradov_zen |
| Description | Канал о заработке на Яндекс.Дзен. Научу зарабатывать на Дзене от 150 000 рублей в месяц Связь со мной: @gradov_info |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Gradov_zen |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Gradov_zen/429 · this entry12 Aug 2023, 17:11 UTC | @Gradov_dzen/41812 Aug 2023, 17:11 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Gradov_zen/432 · this entry16 Aug 2023, 06:35 UTC | @Gradov_dzen/42116 Aug 2023, 06:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Gradov_zen/433 · this entry17 Aug 2023, 09:21 UTC | @Gradov_dzen/42217 Aug 2023, 09:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Gradov_zen/434 · this entry17 Aug 2023, 11:53 UTC | @Gradov_dzen/42317 Aug 2023, 11:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Gradov_zen/435 · this entry18 Aug 2023, 05:05 UTC | @Gradov_dzen/42418 Aug 2023, 05:05 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Gradov_dzen/42518 Aug 2023, 12:43 UTC | @Gradov_zen/436 · this entry18 Aug 2023, 12:44 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Gradov_dzen | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9–4) |
| @Gradov_DzenGuru | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @Gradov_DzenGuru (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 August 2023 to 6 September 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @Gradov_zen — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 390 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 390 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
112 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 112 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2023 to 6 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 ВЗРЫВНОЙ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТ! Протестировал создание сайтов через ИИ: один результат разочаровал, а другой прям поразил Делал САЙТ с помощью ChatGPT за 60, 6000 и 60 000 секунд + задействовал ТОП нейросети В видео увидите какие ИИ реально работают, а какие пустышки (результат говорит за себя): 👉 СМОТРЕТЬ ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС 👉 ПОВТОРИТЬ РЕЗУЛЬТАТ 👉 БЕСПЛАТНЫЕ ПОДПИСЧИКИ
🔥14
✅ Монетизация на ДЗЕН за 7 дней Подготовил пошаговый план, который поможет быстрее подключить монетизацию и получать ДОХОД за просмотры Буду признателен и благодарен за ваши лайки под видео + обратную связь в комментариях! 👉 СМОТРЕТЬ ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС
🔥24
Вот это я понимаю доброе утро понедельника! 🤯 Всем заряженной недели, шикарного настроения и большого профита! 🥳
🔥19
Инструкция по использованию приложения Яндекс.Дзен: 1) Доезжаем до своих родных, близких или друзей; 2) забираем их и едем за покупочками; 3) по пути делаем выплату с дзена; 4) закупаемся и наслаждаемся 5) радуем своих родных и близких 🤗
🔥20
Это всё–таки произошло! 🙉 Пришёл на обучение, а обещанного дохода так и не получил.. Публикация прямо обязательна к прочтению для КАЖДОГО: 👉 ЧИТАТЬ ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС
🔥18
Восстанавливаю силы после 5-и дневного нейро–интенсивна 🔥 Еще в детстве мама мне говорила, что лучший отдых – это смена деятельности 💪 Из главных новостей: 🔶 Новый канал вышел на монетизацию, сегодня подключаю анкету (потребовалось 8 дней) 🔶 В нашем нейро-интенсиве приняло участие более 700 человек и это еще не конец (завтра для ВИП участников буду готовить бонусный урок по ускоренному выходу на монету) 🔶 Мама у…
🔥11
Уже сил НЕТ на этот ДЗЕН❗️С такими словами написал мне автор одного канала с довольно распространённой проблемой: 1️⃣ Доход 200 рублей в день и что только не делал НА и С каналом, а прибыль расти не хочет 2️⃣ В силу определённых обстоятельств заниматься каналом сейчас практически не может (временно по здоровью) 🙏 Поэтому, обратился ко мне не за консультацией, а с предложением: – Игорь, давайте вы этот канал будет…
🔥4
📌 Прекращай уже любить бедность Тебя шокирует эта история, но хочу чтобы ты её знал (она очень поучительная) ➢ Сегодня созванивался с парнем (не буду называть имени) с анкеты на личную работу в моём проекте Я спросил у него: "зачем тебе деньги?", "Зачем тебе участвовать в запуске?" И он ответил: 1️⃣ «хочу закрыть кредиты на 500.000 ₽» 2️⃣ «ни разу не был за границей» 3️⃣ «у отца обнаружили злокачественная оп…
Только что провёл сумашедший эфир, где поделился, как за 30 дней заработал 3.400.000 рублей (прямо разложил всё по основным этапам, что было сделано) Открываете план, повторяете – получаете результат в доходе. Посмотреть можно будет только сегодня и завтра до вечера здесь: 👉 https://t.me/+w-Rs_7x-Fm9hNjhi
По первой, когда ты оседлал волну, кажется, что она всячески пытается тебя скинуть.. Но! Если расслабиться, начать получать удовольствие и самое главное – не делать лишних телодвижений, то всё начинает получаться и идти как по маслу👌 Ну и не стоит забывать, сколько раз пришлось упасть, произвести разбор ошибок, чтобы наконец-то оседлать волну и поехать. Зацените момент, когда я уже начал уходить под воду, но решил…
Передумал, Дзен не для меня 😱 Не волнуйтесь, не я. Я тут с основания Дзена и никуда с такими доходами точно не собираюсь! Но вот многие из вас такое регулярно пишите мне или моим менеджерам. Я ещё не знаю ни одного человека, кому Дзен бы не подошёл. В Гайде 📝 подробно расписал 3 стратегии заработка на платформе, если вы автор, эксперт или хотите вообще заработать на чужом контенте. 🤯 Но наш мозг искусно защищает н…
Проооооосто 🤣🤣🤣 Кстати, многие каналы на днях просели в показах. Не просто просели, а их прям будто обрубило по траффику! Дело в том, что дзен проводит фин.ревизию и актуализацию анкет (может до конца недели запросить обновить селфи и фото паспорта в анкете монетизации) Просмотры уже начинают потихоньку восстанавливаться, поэтому не переживайте, если на вашем канале тоже резко обрубило показы – уже в ближайшие дни…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Gradov_zen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gradov Zen| 150к+ на Дзене” (@Gradov_zen), 390 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gradov_zen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.