گفتمان: گروه، فرد، تعامل، مرز، انسجام، نقش
اینجا ما راجع به گروه درمانی تحلیلی و پویایی های گروهی و اجتماعی حرف میزنیم.
ایدی جهت شرکت در گروه درمانی، دوره ها و سوپرویژن:
@AG_Gofteman
https://www.instagram.com/dr.bashi_psychotherapist
Tell: 09931328402
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 781–783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 15:35
782
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:48
782
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 782 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
4,422
Reactions total
100
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
209
Videos
6
Links
166
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47
47.0%
👍
23
23.0%
🙏
12
12.0%
👏
9
9.00%
👌
7
7.00%
👎
1
1.00%
🔥
1
1.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▪️Trauma, Prejudice, Large-Group Identity and Psychoanalysis
Volkan, V. D. (2021)
این مقاله از وامیک ولکان، روانکاو و پژوهشگر روانشناسی گروه های بزرگ، بررسی می کند که تروماهای جمعی چگونه با هویت قومی، ملی، مذهبی و سیاسی گره می خورند و در شرایطی به تعصب، دشمن سازی و خشونت میان گروهی دامن می زنند.
ولکان بحث را با تجربه های شخصی خود از کودکی در قبرسِ جنگ زده و سپس مواجهه اش با بازماندگان هولوکاست شروع می کند. این بخش …
دوستان و همکاران عزیز،
در پی مکاتبهای که با IAGP (The International Association for Group Psychotherapy and Group Processes) داشتم، به من اطلاع داده شد که این انجمن امکان «معافیت یکساله از پرداخت حق عضویت» یا همان membership fee waiver را برای من فراهم کرده است. در همان ایمیل همچنین تصریح شده که این امکان برای همکاران ایرانی دیگری که در حال حاضر در ایران زندگی میکنند و تحت تأثیر شرایط دشوار فعلی و محدودیتهای پرد…
«حصار و سگهای پدرم» روایتی تکاندهنده از زندگی خانوادهای است که سالها در پشت حصاری بلند و زیر سلطه پدری مستبد زندانی شدهاند. پدری که با قدرت، ترس و سگهای نگهبانش بر همه چیز و همه کس حکومت میکند؛ تا جایی که فرزندانش نه حق انتخاب دارند، نه حق عشق ورزیدن و نه حتی حق رؤیا دیدن. در نهایت، اعضای خانواده برای رهایی از این وضعیت، از پسر بزرگ میخواهند پدر را بکشد و او نیز این کار را انجام میدهد. اما پس از مرگ پدر، حقی…
کتاب «درسگفتارهای مقدماتی جدید در باب روانکاوی»، از مهمترین آثار متأخر زیگموند فروید، برای نخستین بار به فارسی منتشر شد.
مرکز روانکاوی و هنر مان، این کتاب را بهعنوان نخستین اثر از مجموعه انتشارهای خود، بهصورت نسخهی دیجیتال و رایگان در اختیار علاقهمندان قرار داده است.
نسخه دیجیتال کتاب از طریق لینک زیر در وبسایت مان قابل دریافت است.
https://themaancenter.com/articles/New-Introductory-Lectures-on-Psychoanalys…
✅ در زندگی همیشه فرصت نامحدود برای تغییر نداریم. گاهی دانستن اینکه زمان محدود است، باعث میشود تصمیمهایی بگیریم که سالها به تعویق انداخته بودیم. گاهی زمان خود عامل درمانی می شود.
#گروه_با_زمان_محدود
@Gofteman_AnalyticGroup
✅ حقیقت چیزی نیست که انسان آن را خلق کند.
بلکه حقیقت وجود دارد و ذهن باید ظرفیت پذیرش آن را پیدا کند.
مشکل اینجاست که حقیقت همیشه آرامشبخش نیست؛ گاهی حقیقت دردناک، شرم آور و ضعیف کننده است. به همین خاطر گاهیاوقات انکار یا تحریف می شود.
✔️برداشتی از مقاله On Arrogance نوشته ویلفرد بیون
#ویلفرد_بیون
@Gofteman_AnalyticGroup
کنجکاوی بهخودیخود ارزشمند است، اما اگر با فروتنی همراه نباشد، میتواند به میل وسواسگونه برای دانستن و احساس برتری تبدیل شود.
✔️برداشتی از مقاله On Arrogance نوشته ویلفرد بیون
#ویلفرد_بیون
@Gofteman_AnalyticGroup
من نمیدانم
و همین درد مرا سخت میآزارد
که چرا انسان، این دانا
این پیغمبر
در تکاپوهایش:
چیزی از معجزه آن سوتر
ره نبردهست به اعجاز محبت،
چه دلیلی دارد؟؟
چه دلیلی دارد
که هنوز
مهربانی را نشناخته است؟
و نمیداند در یک لبخند،
چه شگفتیهایی پنهان است!
من بر آنم که در این دنیا
خوب بودن - بهخدا- سهلترین کار است
و نمیدانم
که چرا انسان،
تا این حد،
با خوبی بیگانه است؟
و همین درد مرا سخت میآزارد!
فریدون مشیری
@Goftema…
❤4👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Gofteman_AnalyticGroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,157,277 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گُفتِمان” (@Gofteman_AnalyticGroup), 782 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gofteman_AnalyticGroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
