Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for God Damn It!

Channel

God Damn It!

@GodDamnItNBA

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,326subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001117255619
TypeChannel
Username@GodDamnItNBA
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/GodDamnItNBA

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3026,3756,338.56 August 2026 — 6,352 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,352 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,350 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,352 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,346 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,358 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,374 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,375 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,371 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,364 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,343 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,351 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,331 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,324 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,328 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,305 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,302 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,339 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,350 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,358 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,351 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,349 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,338 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,328 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,319 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,318 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,326 subscribers6,3266 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,291–6,386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 02:286,326+8
6 Nov 2026, 18:186,318-1
3 Nov 2026, 10:156,319-9
31 Oct 2026, 10:286,328-10
28 Oct 2026, 11:066,338-11
25 Oct 2026, 20:186,349-2
22 Oct 2026, 10:486,351-7
19 Oct 2026, 02:306,358+8
16 Oct 2026, 00:386,350+11
12 Oct 2026, 15:356,339+37
5 Oct 2026, 20:226,302-3
28 Sept 2026, 04:566,305-23
18 Sept 2026, 11:186,328+4
14 Sept 2026, 05:206,324-7
10 Sept 2026, 18:196,331-20
5 Sept 2026, 06:596,351+8
1 Sept 2026, 05:246,343-21
29 Aug 2026, 00:146,364-7
25 Aug 2026, 15:436,371-4
22 Aug 2026, 12:336,375first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 6,326 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held61 (24 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total52,985
Reactions total929
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,407 reactions across 57 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍76631.8%
🔥63326.3%
😁31012.9%
👏1978.18%
😢1566.48%
🤯1425.90%
🕊994.11%
👎913.78%
🐳130.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (46.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC835 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В паре подкастов, выложенных в открытый доступ, мы обошли вниманием "Голден Стэйт". В начале сезона там было все так печально, что пинать больного льва выглядело моветоном. Потом случилась история с Кристапсом Порзингисом, ведущая нас к скорому расставанию клуба с форвардом. А потом... Потом "Уорриорз" выдали победную серию, что удивила многих экспертов - чуть прикусили языки даже те, кто хоронил "воинов", называя п…

👍21👏7

6 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,040 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026

5 ноября «Орландо» (2–6) 104:117 «Финикс» (2–5) ⭐️ Девин Букер: 30 очков, 1 подбор, 8 передач, 3 перехвата. Подборы: 48 — 33 Передачи: 28 — 30 Перехваты: 9 — 14 Потери: 25 — 15 «Майами» (3–6) 100:120 «Голден Стэйт» (6–3) ⭐️ Яксель Лендеборг: 17 очков, 8 подборов, 6 передач, 3 перехвата. Подборы: 39 — 44 Передачи: 27 — 36 Перехваты: 8 — 11 Потери: 22 — 19 @GodDamnItNBA - канал о лучшей игре с мячом 🏀 | Поддержа…

👍9

Signed GodDamnItBot

5 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,340 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Дед on air. Выпуск 2. Почему жаль Франца Вагнера, куда покатилась «Юта», а также респект ветерану «Детройта» Дмитрий Герчиков вновь выходит на связь с подписчиками платных ресурсов «Какого Хирро?!» и разбирает моменты, что остались за кадром открытого подкаста. В монологе Дед страдает вместе с Францем Вагнером и «Орландо», не понимает идей Уилла Харди в «Юте» и восхищается работой Данкана Робинсона в «Детройте». Pa…

🔥7👎2🐳1

5 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,450 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026

4 ноября «Майами» (3–5) 117:116 «Клипперс» (1–7) (ОТ) ⭐️ Яннис Адетокумбо: 27 очков, 14 подборов, 6 передач, 3 блок-шота. Подборы: 50 — 47 Передачи: 35 — 30 Перехваты: 10 — 7 Потери: 12 — 20 «Юта» (1–7) 113:120 «Новый Орлеан» (4–4) (ОТ) ⭐️ Деджонте Мюррэй: 20 очков, 8 подборов, 4 передачи, 4 перехвата. Подборы: 49 — 48 Передачи: 24 — 23 Перехваты: 8 — 10 Потери: 22 — 19 «Даллас» (4–4) 111:112 «Сан-Антонио» (6–…

🔥19😢4👎2👍1

Signed GodDamnItBot

4 Nov 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,560 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Стартовые цифры Притчарда при этом довольно обманчивы. В среднем у него 13,4 очка, но без двух матчей против «Чикаго» - только 7,2 при 7,8 броска за вечер. Уайт начал сезон с 32% трехочковых; защите тоже гораздо легче пережить передачу наружу, когда следующий бросающий пока не наказывает стабильно. Маззулла пробовал добавлять размер двойками больших. В этом есть понятная логика: получить еще одну мишень под аллей-уп…

🔥29👍8

Signed Максим Коршунов

4 Nov 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,540 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026

«Бостон» чаще лезет под кольцо и да, без Тейтума это почти невозможно. Самое интересное изменение в атаке «Бостона» на старте - насколько чаще команда добирается непосредственно до краски. В прошлом сезоне «Селтикс» выполняли всего 22 броска за матч с дистанции до пяти футов (до ~ 1,5 метра) последнее место в лиге. При этом реализовывали 69%, второй показатель. Сейчас объем вырос до 28,3 попытки, а реализация опуст…

🔥23🕊1

Signed Максим Коршунов

4 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,620 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Какого Herro я подписан на это?! Живая лента, а не архив: реакция на новости в момент, когда они случились, голосовые от нас двоих и чат, где мы сидим сами. Всё внутри Telegram — никуда переходить не надо. Отписка в любой момент.

👍6👎5🔥3👏2

Signed Tribute

4 Nov 2026, 03:04 UTC≈1,850 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Пока американцы делали непонятные нам вещи (выборы) и отказались от игр НБА, то я выпустил еще итерацию (знаю вчера многие словили ошибки тренировок, вот тут исправление + драфт расширения + работа с финансами + появилась возможность включать в обмен своп пиков) Пользуйтесь, фидбек все там же можете оставить! Windows: тык macOS: тык Android: тык @GodDamnItNBA - канал о лучшей игре с мячом 🏀 | Поддержать проект | Ч…

😁15👎9🔥8

Signed Максим Коршунов

3 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,930 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Ребят, я получил порядка сотни комментариев за эти 4 дня. Круто, спасибо большое, правда! Апдейт, была версия 0.3.44, стала 0.3.47 и в ней очень много из того что вы писали. Важное: • Ваши сейвы при обновлении не должны пострадать, но можете в главном меню экспортнуть на всякий • Что изменилось без деталей - увидите в игре при первом заходе changelog + кто оставлял фидбек через бота, получит отбивку от бота • Вер…

🔥29👍4

Signed Максим Коршунов

3 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,800 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Макс Коршунов и Дмитрий Герчиков разбирают старт недели в НБА: 🧠 "Мемфис": откуда взялись 6-0? 🔥 "Портленд": чем удивляют Морант и Лиллард? 🔮 "Нью-Йорк": куда катится чемпион? 📊 Аналитика, эмоции, немного хейта и, конечно, любовь к баскетболу. https://youtu.be/yENopMC8M3Q?si=tciUa3lXDVRn-A76 https://youtu.be/yENopMC8M3Q?si=tciUa3lXDVRn-A76 https://youtu.be/yENopMC8M3Q?si=tciUa3lXDVRn-A76 🎁 ПОДДЕРЖАТЬ ПРОЕКТ! 💛 Ap…

👍17👏3

Signed Максим Коршунов

3 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,580 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

2 ноября «Новый Орлеан» (3–4) 135:134 «Мемфис» (6–1) (ОТ) ⭐️ Зайон Уильямсон: 25 очков, 11 подборов, 4 передачи. Подборы: 47 — 49 Передачи: 27 — 30 Перехваты: 8 — 5 Потери: 8 — 16 «Финикс» (1–4) 113:116 «Голден Стэйт» (5–3) ⭐️ Стефен Карри: 34 очка, 6 подборов, 7 передач. Подборы: 37 — 44 Передачи: 28 — 23 Перехваты: 11 — 7 Потери: 15 — 13 «Атланта» (4–4) 108:104 «Индиана» (2–6) ⭐️ Никил Александер-Уокер: 34 …

👍12👎5

Signed GodDamnItBot

2 Nov 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,720 views43 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Мы уже записали для вас традиционный бесплатный подкаст под открытый доступ. И в нем - по многочисленным пользам подписчиков - будет много про "Мемфис". Но в момент, когда ваш Дед готовился к записи, наткнулся на классную историю о Туомасе Иисало, которую припас аккуратно под пост-тизер. Чтобы вам было интереснее ждать, а нам - чуть меньше говорить про команду, которой и так посвятили полчаса)) Так вот, история каса…

👍30🔥13

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @GodDamnItNBA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NBA. NEWS
@nba_best_news · 39,931
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
topbasketteam
@realtopbasket · 68,915
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
🏀 NBA Injuries
@NBAInjuries · 105,723
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
«Перехват». Канал о баскетболе
@thesteal · 41,218
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“God Damn It!” (@GodDamnItNBA), 6,326 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GodDamnItNBA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.