Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TEAM GOBO

@Goboclub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,843subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001501572926
TypeChannel
Username@Goboclub
Created27 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Goboclub

Growth

4,8434,8564,849.57 August 2026 — 4,856 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,856 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,851 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,843 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,841–4,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:244,843-8
10 Aug 2026, 11:414,851-5
7 Aug 2026, 01:454,856no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:364,856first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.14%
avg views ÷ 4,843 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.435%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held50 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total12,443
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍360.0%
240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC53 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔄DAY CRYPTO BUBBLES 오늘자 알트코인의 등락폭을 나타냅니다. 출처 - TEAM GOBO

12 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC71 viewsread 12 August 2026

7월 중앙화거래소 거래량 $3.8조…2년 8개월래 최저 7월 중앙화거래소(CEX)의 현물 및 파생상품 거래량이 전월 대비 23.9% 감소한 3조7600억달러로, 2023년 11월 이후 최저치를 기록했다고 코인데스크가 전했다. 현물 거래량은 31.2% 줄어든 7270억달러로 2023년 10월 이후 가장 적었으며, 파생상품 거래량도 21.9% 감소한 3조300억달러로 집계됐다. 반면 탈중앙화거래소(DEX)가 전체 현물 거래에서 차지하는 비중은 역대 최고인 19.5%로 상승했다. 파생상품 비중도 전체 CEX 거래량의 80.6%로 2023년 9월 이후 최고치를 기록했다. CEX의 실물자산(RWA) 무기한 선물 거래량은 47.8% 증가한 4600억달러로 사상 최대를 기록했다.

12 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC127 viewsread 12 August 2026

📌업비트 공지 [거래] 프롬(PROM) KRW, USDT 마켓 디지털 자산 추가

12 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC133 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️오늘의 암호화폐 주요뉴스 (2026년 8월 12일 수요일) 해당 뉴스 헤드라인을 포털사이트에 검색하시면 자세한 내용을 보실수 있습니다. 출처 - TEAM GOBO

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC267 viewsread 12 August 2026

❇️ 美 ADP 주간 민간고용 8300명 증가…직전 1만5000명서 둔화 - 미국 민간 부문 고용이 8300명 증가에 그쳐 직전 1만5000명 증가보다 둔화됐다고 밝혔다. - ADP 주간 고용변화는 최근 4주간 고용변화의 이동평균을 반영하는 고빈도 지표라고 전했다. - 고용 증가세 약화는 경기와 소비 둔화 신호로 해석될 수 있으며 통상 미국 달러 약세 요인으로 작용할 수 있다고 전했다.

11 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC458 viewsread 12 August 2026

시장 관계자 "비트마트 파산 가능성..자금 동결 지속" 가상자산 프로젝트 오픈그라디언트(OpenGradient)의 매슈 왕(Matthew Wang) 공동 창업자 겸 최고경영자(CEO)가 거래소 비트마트(BitMart)의 파산 가능성을 제기했다. 자신의 마켓메이킹 팀 자금이 비트마트에 묶여 인출되지 않고 있다는 이유에서다. 왕 CEO는 비트마트가 서비스 종료를 발표하기 불과 일주일 전, 토큰 보유자들에게 플랫폼 내 자산을 동결(락업)하라고 요구했다며 "해당 캠페인은 유동성을 끌어모으기 위한 목적이 컸다"고 주장했다. 다만 이러한 주장은 아직 독립적으로 검증되지 않았으며, 비트마트 측은 왕 CEO의 의혹 제기에 대해 공식적인 입장을 내놓지 않고 있다. 앞서 비트마트 창업자는 질서 있는 사업 종료를 완료하는 것을 목표로 하고 있으며, 공지를 기다

11 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC290 viewsread 12 August 2026

블랙록 "BTC 투자심리 개선...주식과 디커플링 긍정적" 블랙록 디지털자산 책임자 로비 미치닉(Robbie Mitchnick)이 "최근 한 달여간 비트코인(BTC)에 대한 투자심리가 눈에 띄게 개선되고 있다"고 분석했다. 더블록에 따르면 그는 "BTC는 올해 초부터 주식과 디커플링되기 시작했다. 7월 AI 관련주가 크게 조정받았을 때 BTC는 상대적으로 강한 흐름을 보였다. 이러한 디커플링은 BTC를 포트폴리오 다각화 수단이자 극단적 하방 위험에 대한 잠재적 헤지 수단으로 보는 투자 논리에 긍정적"이라고 설명했다. 이어 그는 "BTC 현물 ETF 투자자들은 대체로 장기 보유 성향을 보이고 있다"고 덧붙였다.

11 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC258 viewsread 12 August 2026

📌업비트 공지 [거래] 댑오에스(DOS) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓)

10 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC269 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀MSTR 은 STRC의 가격을 회복 시키면서 폰지를 방어하기 위해 노력하고 있군요.

10 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC246 viewsread 12 August 2026

*일본 중앙은행(BOJ)의 9월 금리 인상 신호로 인해 미국도 개입에 동참하게 되었다: 교도통신

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Goboclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 570,143 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TEAM GOBO” (@Goboclub), 4,843 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Goboclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.