Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Генеалогия и семейные тайны

Channel

Генеалогия и семейные тайны

@Genealogy_IT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

384subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002029447653
TypeChannel
Username@Genealogy_IT
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Genealogy_IT

Growth

38410 September 2026 — 384 subscribers12 September 2026 — 384 subscribers10 September 202612 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 383–385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 07:40384no change
10 Sept 2026, 09:22384first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.7%
avg views ÷ 384 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held11 (6 May 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total641
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

225 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8035.6%
🔥5323.6%
💔2410.7%
👍167.11%
👨‍💻167.11%
🎉83.56%
😢62.67%
💯52.22%
custom 531000117767125836231.33%
⚡31.33%
👏31.33%
😁20.889%
🤨20.889%
❤‍🔥10.444%
🐳10.444%
😱10.444%
🥰10.444%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Genealogy_IT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC78 views16 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Говорят, что я с годами не меняюсь. Не знаю даже 🧐 Скажу точно, что не изменилось 2 вещи: все время провожу за компьютером и любовь к сладкому 💜

🔥9❤6❤‍🔥1

5 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC141 views15 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Если вы ведете поиск по советскому периоду, личная карточка Т-2 - документ категории «must-have». Это анкета, которую заполняли на каждого сотрудника в отделе кадров. Она содержит массу сведений, которые трудно найти в других источниках. На фото в посте (карточка моей бабушки) я разметила основные графы, чтобы вы легко ориентировались. 🔜 На что обращать внимание в первую очередь: 1⃣Семейное положение (графа 15): П…

👍7🔥6❤1👨‍💻1

27 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC229 views15 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Это оригинал записи из МК 1847 года. А теперь смотрим на самого нижнего жениха и видим, что отчество у него отсутствует. Есть лишь какой-то набор букв после имени, а дальше идет фамилия. Эта запись не давала мне покоя несколько дней, и я уже начала в себе сомневаться и думать, что просто не могу прочитать там отчество. Решила я закинуть скриншот в мой любимый Gemini, вместо анализа почерка, выдвижения гипотез, он п…

🔥6👍3👨‍💻3💯3

26 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC193 views5 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Предлагаю сыграть в генеалогическую игру! С этим фрагментом МК что-то не так, чтобы это понять не требуются другие вводные данные или то, что было обрезано. Не нужен и ФОД. Просто посмотрите и напишите вашу версию. А потом я обязательно расскажу 😀

👨‍💻2🤨2😱1

14 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC297 views32 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Очень часто, когда я просматриваю архивные дела, меня спрашивают: «Зачем смотреть их полностью?!». Ведь известен поселок, известна церковь, и кажется абсолютно очевидным, что листать 400 страниц вместо 100 - бессмысленная трата времени. Но это мой выбор и мой подход к работе. Сколько раз бывало: семья уверена, что 150 лет все жили на одном месте, а запись о браке обнаруживается в соседнем приходе! Или при подшивке к…

🔥20❤6👏3👨‍💻3

24 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC312 views28 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Мне сегодня 27! Принимаю поздравления с днем рождения 🗯 Второй раз в жизни пекла меренговый рулет. Спросите, причем здесь генеалогия?! А в том, что у мамы он вкуснейший, у меня теперь тоже, так что можно смело вписывать в семейные рецепты и передавать из поколения в поколение ☀

❤18🎉8👨‍💻2

15 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC389 views20 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Когда мы думаем о дореволюционной Кубани и южных губерниях, воображение рисует классическую картину: бравые казаки, строгий патриархальный уклад, непоколебимая православная вера и браки «один раз и на всю жизнь». Ведь развестись в Российской империи было практически невозможно. Книга исследователя С. Д. Бондаря 1916 года открывает мир, где казачьи традиции смешались с иудейским и обрядами. Официально империя делила …

🔥11👍4❤3👨‍💻1🥰1

13 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC324 views13 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Всем привет! На сайте проекта "Открытая генеалогия" в тестовом режиме запущен раздел с описями из архивов. Если интересно посмотреть и протестировать, то оставляю ссылку для вас ➡ https://genealogyit.com/general/catalogue/ И напоминаю, что база медленно, но верно пополняется новыми регионами и фамилиями. Прямо сейчас в базе данных 30383 записи из 132 регионов.

❤10👍2👨‍💻1

16 Jun 2026, 18:29 UTC383 views17 reactionsread 10 September 2026

В последнее время кажется, что привычные мосты между нами решили дружно уйти на техобслуживание. ВГД капризничает в Казахстане, Телеграм штормит в России, а на Familio временно не получается выставить счет... Из-за всех этих блокировок и сбоев порой накатывает ощущение, что наше теплое генеалогическое комьюнити стало чуть тише. Но грустить мы не будем! Потому что там, где закрывается одна дверь, обязательно остается…

❤10⚡3custom 53100011776712583623👨‍💻1

11 Jun 2026, 21:59 UTC355 views18 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Я часто вижу, как Колбаса женился на Убей-Конь или Волкова стала женой Зайцева. Честно?! Я улыбаюсь каждый раз от этих сочетаний, ведь специально такого добиться трудно. А думали ли об этом наши предки? Шутили ли они на эту тему? Вопрос, конечно.

❤14🐳1👨‍💻1💯1😁1

6 May 2026, 20:25 UTC580 views46 reactions1 Starread 10 September 2026
Photo

Клад. Рука не поднимается назвать это как-то иначе. Я просматривала совершенно чужое дело, но оно так глубоко запало в душу, что я не могу молчать. Что же почувствуют потомки, когда (и если) прочитают эти строки? Иван Петрович не писал дежурных фраз. В его письмах - не «Люблю, скучаю», а нечто большее. «Сердечно прошу тебя, моя дорогая, береги себя», - просил он жену. В каждом письме - невероятное тепло: «Мой ангел…

💔24❤12😢6👨‍💻1💯1🔥1😁1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Genealogy_IT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Маша Блинова Рецепты. Masha Blinova food
@mashablinova_food · 22,794
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@liliya_foodbloger
@liliya_foodblogger · 27,845
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Генеалогия и семейные тайны” (@Genealogy_IT), 384 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Genealogy_IT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.