Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gedankenwolken

Channel

Gedankenwolken

@Gedankenwolken

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,492subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001332218580
TypeChannel
Username@Gedankenwolken
Created2 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gedankenwolken

Growth

5,4725,4965,4846 August 2026 — 5,472 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,472 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,475 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,496 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,492 subscribers5,4926 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,468–5,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:235,492-4
10 Aug 2026, 04:575,496+21
6 Aug 2026, 23:315,475+3
6 Aug 2026, 10:325,472no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:075,472first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 5,492 subscribers
Avg views / post
878
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total15,795
Reactions total413
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 44s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

479 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20242.2%
🤣13127.3%
🙏5311.1%
👍438.98%
💯296.05%
🤩132.71%
🥰71.46%
😇10.209%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 479reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC939 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Guten Morgen ihr Lieben, ... Ferien/ Urlaub und ich widme mich wieder intensiver der Familie, der Freizeit, dem Zusammensein! 🤱 Energie tanken, Luft holen, frei von Verpflichtungen sein - in den Tag hinein leben & das Leben anders genießen 🍸 Lese dich gerne durch meine alten Beiträge, nutze am Wochenende vergangene Achtsamkeit- und Entspannungsübungen, wenn du Lust hast natürlich, schreibe in den Chat https://t.m

27🥰6

23 Jul 2026, 04:15 UTC938 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Die meisten Menschen sind so glücklich, wie sie es geistig einrichten können. Abraham Lincoln @Gedankenwolken

15💯5🙏3

22 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC989 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

...in diesem Sinne: Guten Morgen an alle und einen schönen Mittwoch ☀️ @Gedankenwolken

🤣25

22 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC859 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😂😂😂 ...wenn es doch nur so einfach wäre... 😂 @Gedankenwolken

🤣20👍2😇1

22 Jul 2026, 04:07 UTC808 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Autsch... 🙈😅 ...oder: wer im Glashaus sitzt... @Gedankenwolken

🤣23

22 Jul 2026, 04:05 UTC887 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Das gute, alte Nokia 😁 @Gedankenwolken

🤣215👍4

21 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC810 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Kinder nach einer Trennung: innere Stabilität aufbauen Wenn sich Eltern trennen, gerät für Kinder oft die ganze Welt ins Wanken. Viele Kinder fragen sich im Geheimen: ○ Habe ich etwas falsch gemacht? ○ Bleibt jetzt alles so chaotisch? ○ Sehe ich Mama/ Papa weiterhin? In meinem neuen Artikel zeige ich, wie Kinder nach einer Trennung wieder innere Stabilität aufbauen können: ♡ mit einfachen Ritualen ♡ offenen Gespräc

14

21 Jul 2026, 04:24 UTC895 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Wenn man sich nur in die Blüten und nicht in die Wurzeln eines Menschen verliebt, weiß man ab Herbst nicht mehr,was man tun soll. 🌸🍁🌸🍂🌸🍁🌸🍂 Verliebe dich nicht nur ins Schöne und Leichte. Schaue auch in die Tiefe, dorthin, wo die Wurzeln sitzen. Denn nur wer die Wurzeln kennt, bleibt, wenn die Blüten fallen. 🌺 @Gedankenwolken

23💯6👍2

21 Jul 2026, 04:23 UTC895 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Gesunde Grenzen entwickeln 🤍 @Gedankenwolken

12💯10

21 Jul 2026, 04:22 UTC696 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Einen von viel Glück geprägtem Dienstag, für alle die es gut gebrauchen können ☘💋 @Gedankenwolken

20🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Gedankenwolken. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 632,372 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gedankenwolken” (@Gedankenwolken), 5,492 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gedankenwolken.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.