Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Geburtenrate

@GeburtenRate

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001160069507
TypeChannel
Username@GeburtenRate
DescriptionWas - besser WIE - ist die "Qualität" unserer nächsten Generationen? ... Haben wir eine Lösung? ... JA - HABEN WIR !!! ....
Created16 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/GeburtenRate

Growth

287 August 2026 — 28 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:3028no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5128first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
85
Videos
127
Links
246

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
33m 05s
Average length
3m 41s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2025 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jun 2026, 21:16 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Geburten Kontrolle ist Aufgabe des Staates wie in China oder Nordkorea xD

16 May 2026, 19:04 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Der Trend ist eindeutig: Bereits zum vierten Mal in Folge sinkt die Zahl der Geburten in Deutschland. Besonders in einigen Bundesländern haben die Frauen wenig Lust auf Nachwuchs. Woran das wohl liegt? Im vergangenen Jahr sind in Deutschland so wenige Babys geboren worden wie noch nie seit 1946. Die Zahl der Geburten sank zum vierten Mal in Folge, wie das Statistische Bundesamt mitteilt. Vorläufigen Ergebnissen zuf

16 May 2026, 16:13 UTC24 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @KlagemauerTVVideo

Beatrix von Storch: Abtreibungen und die Klimaagenda werden von unseren Steuergeldern finanziert! Die deutsche Bundesregierung treibt die weltweite Bevölkerungsreduktion und Abtreibungsagenda mit Millionen Steuergeldern massiv voran. Von den Systemmedien werden diese Zusammenhänge vielfach als Verschwörungstheorie abgetan. Sehen Sie dazu unbedingt die enthüllende Rede von Beatrix von Storch! Video, Text & Quellen:

7 Feb 2026, 14:14 UTC67 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ein Paar aus den USA hat eine Klage gegen eine IVF-Klinik eingereicht, nachdem ein dunkelhäutiges Kind geboren wurde. Beide Eltern sind weiß. Steven Mills und Tiffany Skor aus Florida forderten von der Reproduktionsmedizinischen Klinik in Longwood Erklärungen, nachdem sich herausstellte, dass das Kind, das Mitte Dezember von einer Frau geboren wurde, nicht ihre biologische Tochter ist. Im Jahr 2020 ließ das Paar in

19 Jan 2026, 08:46 UTC68 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Die GEBURTSMAFIA: Warum die moderne Medizin unsere Kinder systematisch bricht Erfahre in diesem Video, warum unsere Gesellschaft durch gezielte Manipulation bei der Geburt systematisch von ihrem Urvertrauen entfremdet wird. Du lernst, wie das medizinische System als rein ökonomisches Geschäftsmodell den natürlichen Prozess stört, um Menschen bereits am Lebensbeginn für Ängste manipulierbar zu machen. Erkenne die Aus

17 Jan 2026, 22:24 UTC58 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @DDDDoffiziell

RIESIGER ERFOLG FÜR PRO-LIFE! 🔥 Ein Gesetzentwurf, der die Verwendung staatlicher Gelder für Abtreibungen verbietet, wurde im Senat mit 81 zu 15 Stimmen angenommen. HR6938 enthält Bestimmungen, die die Verwendung von Haushaltsmitteln für Abtreibungen im Rahmen eines Titels des Justizministeriums verbieten. Ausgenommen sind Fälle, in denen das Leben der Mutter durch das Austragen des Fötus gefährdet wäre, oder Fälle

8 Dec 2025, 13:10 UTC58 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @DDDDoffiziellPhoto

EBEN JETZT - Ein von Gesundheitsminister Robert F. Kennedy Jr. handverlesenes Beratungsgremium für Impfstoffe stimmte am Freitag dafür, die jahrzehntealte föderale Empfehlung fallen zu lassen, dass alle Säuglinge bei der Geburt den Hepatitis-B-Impfstoff erhalten sollen. https://t.me/WeTheMedia/133222 Dirk Dietrich https://t.me/DDDDoffiziell 🔥

18 Nov 2025, 06:34 UTC64 viewsread 11 August 2026

Sind Kinderhaben und romantische Liebe «rechts»? Frauen, die mit Freude Mutter werden oder einen Mann fürs Leben wählen, gelten heute schnell als rechts. Während Konservative Elternschaft und Ehe propagieren, wird das Thema von den Linken fast nur noch negativ besetzt. Birgit Schmid 17.11.2025, 05.30 Uhr https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/taylor-swift-pronatalismus-und-die-neue-debatte-um-kinderwunsch-ld.1911582

17 Nov 2025, 14:24 UTC46 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @SelbstHeilungVideo

🌻Wissen ist eine Holschuld🌻 Beschäftigt Euch damit, was euere Großeltern noch wussten👍 Der aktuellen "Schulmedizin" ist nichts daran gelegen Dich zu heilen, verdient sie doch viel zu gut an der "Symptombehandlung"....😉☕🌞

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GeburtenRate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,049,553 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Geburtenrate” (@GeburtenRate), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeburtenRate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.