Channel
@GamedevForge
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,088subscribers
+40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002006194727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GamedevForge |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GamedevForge |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 1,088 | +36 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 1,052 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 1,048 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 1,048 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 340 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
288 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 146 | 50.7% | |
| 🔥 | 87 | 30.2% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 9.72% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 4.17% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 2.43% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.347% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я каждый раз вымираю от этих рассылок Если кто-то не до конца понимает контекст, давайте на тупом примере Представьте что это родители. И они говорят: "Вот нас заебало что дети себя плохо ведут, мы придумали их пиздить. А теперь записывайтесь на мастер-класс как уворачиваться от наших ударов", хотя как будто логичнее просто заранее иначе воспитывать) Если кто-то прогрелся, то спойлер по мастер классу, там дадут про…
😁18❤2
Скайрим для нордов, геймдев для all genders!!!
😁22❤2
Больше агрегаторов вакансий богу агрегаторов вакансий!
😁5
Потестил прожарку резюме от Романа Сакутина Также чтобы не быть голословным, закинул в claude резюме и отчеты с его прожарки от hirify и Ромы с просьбой сравнить. И как в той известной песне поется "думайте сами, решайте сами" На скрине сводная таблица критериев, а ниже - финальный вывод от claude: Какая лучше — без вариантов, вторая. Она шире по охвату, ловит ровно то, что первая физически проспала: опечатки в ст…
🔥15
В группу под каналом на анальной тяге влетел создатель hirify с требованием пояснить хуле его сокровище это нейрослоп, ведь: "он был сделан когда вайбкодинга еще не было" Примерно с таким же аргументом может гореть любой масленок, который в 2026 году хвастается тем, что сделал тетрис или ту игру про мужика толкающего ящики на старом siemens, но зато сам без мам пап и ваших клод кодов😂 Если кратко, почему я счел hir…
🔥71
Моя ближайшая тактика по организации найма чуть другая👆 Когда я ввел трекинг откликов, то по аналитике увидел ахуенную проблему. Что народ просто забивает болтецкий на отклики. Сделал 5-10 и на сегодня хватит. Хотя в базе знаний буквально есть статья, с сотней студий с вакансиями, с тг-каналами и с несколькими агрегаторами с уникальными вакансиями Поэтому ближайшая цель, помимо качества откликов - это минимальный ц…
❤8
nanomachines, son... 1. проблема в том что тысяча говно/нейро-резюме не гарантирует возможность сделать хорошее 2. проблема топ-10 резюме под твою вакансию в том, что это будут только топ резюме под твою вакансию 3. проблема создания гига вакансии чтобы тестить резюме (и победить предыдущий пункт) в том, что это хуже подойдет конкретным вакансиям 4. проблема ахуенного подгона резюме - это ебаный хх с десятью ваканси…
🤔4
HH: мы вам вкорячили нейронку, чтобы было проще ранжировать кандидатов Рекрутер: понял, принял
😭4😁3
Только хотел передохнуть, попить пива, а тут уже на хвост наступают.....
😁22
Вопрос к разработчикам: Я понимаю когда блоггеры или продаваны нейронок после каждого релиза хайпят "пиздец теперь мир никогда не будет прежним, нейронка даже какает теперь за меня" и тд Но лично я в ежедневных задачах разницы между ближайшими моделями вообще не ощущаю Понятно, что между fable и sonnet или haiku она уже будет явная, но вот между fable и opus 4.8 или gpt 5.4 и 5.5 - ну шо то хуйня шо это Это мне нап…
🤔8
Так уж и по всем специальностям... Но не ссым, я сделал такое же, но не только по хх с тремя вакансиями, а в т.ч. и по вакансиям с сайтов компаний, в этом месяце выкачу
😁7😭3
Послушал вебинар Киры Кузьменко по поиску работы, принес вам главные тейки: 1. "нейронки ATS не выкидывают ваши резюме, а ранжируют" a.k.a "не кидают в мусорку, а двигают поближе к ней" a.k.a "отрицательный рост населения" и прочие удобные тезисы 2. ИИ хрючево это конечно плохо, но вот у меня есть ИИ прожарка резюме и ИИ ассистент при его создании (а у кого их нет уже😂) 3. "на хх нельзя делать кучу резюме - это бред…
😁6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GamedevForge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 264,119 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mikhail Kolobov | Gamedev Forge” (@GamedevForge), 1,088 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GamedevForge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.