Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пепси Лудит

Channel

Пепси Лудит

@ludo_pepsi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,651subscribers

-395 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003084138968
TypeChannel
Username@ludo_pepsi
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ludo_pepsi

Growth

1,6512,0461,848.57 August 2026 — 2,046 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,046 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,966 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,789 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,651 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -395. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,592–2,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:571,651-138
11 Aug 2026, 19:421,789-177
8 Aug 2026, 11:041,966-80
7 Aug 2026, 20:322,046no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:372,046first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.28%
avg views ÷ 1,651 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.6
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total527
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
457.1%
👍228.6%
🔥114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ludo_pepsi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

пиздец на первый вилда бы, это топовый вроде. без стрима играю

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC35 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

планирую запуск куда идём?

  1. stake71%
  2. vodka24%
  3. whale.io6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

похайролили под синькой слили 4к$

1

4 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026

📺📺📺📺📺📺📺 Смотреть ✅ https://kick.com/himolt Деп: 2000$

4 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍2

4 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC23 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greenbratuhaPhoto

🤖🏆 Казино Fenix занимается скамом игроков в своих турнирах. Игрок набрал 27,9 млн очков, занял первую строчку с отрывом в 20 млн от второго места и через полчаса... оказался на седьмом месте. Сразу шесть аккаунтов практически одновременно нарисовались в узком диапазоне от 31,5 до 37,6 млн и вытеснили прежнего лидера. На утреннем скриншоте спустя несколько часов первая семёрка стоит с абсолютно теми же очками, впло

2 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC28 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GambleTeamPhoto

❗️Теперь понятно почему последнее время бонуски в зевсе пустые ⭐️Лудильная. Подписаться

31 Jul 2026, 00:21 UTC46 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📺📺📺📺📺📺📺 Смотреть ✅ https://kick.com/himolt Деп: 200$

28 Jul 2026, 20:25 UTC56 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📺📺📺📺📺📺📺 Смотреть ✅ https://kick.com/himolt Деп: 300$

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ludo_pepsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

планирую запуск куда идём?

  1. stake71%
  2. vodka24%
  3. whale.io6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пепси Лудит” (@ludo_pepsi), 1,651 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ludo_pepsi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.