Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net +118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,586–13,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 08:01
13,726
+13
16 Sept 2026, 00:38
13,713
+2
14 Sept 2026, 05:59
13,711
-9
10 Sept 2026, 11:40
13,720
+4
7 Sept 2026, 09:02
13,716
+18
2 Sept 2026, 23:07
13,698
+7
1 Sept 2026, 21:58
13,691
+16
31 Aug 2026, 20:44
13,675
+2
30 Aug 2026, 18:11
13,673
-4
28 Aug 2026, 17:53
13,677
-1
27 Aug 2026, 20:08
13,678
+7
26 Aug 2026, 20:25
13,671
+6
25 Aug 2026, 22:45
13,665
-7
24 Aug 2026, 23:43
13,672
+1
23 Aug 2026, 10:05
13,671
+14
21 Aug 2026, 19:28
13,657
-9
20 Aug 2026, 15:53
13,666
+9
19 Aug 2026, 16:03
13,657
+23
17 Aug 2026, 17:58
13,634
+13
16 Aug 2026, 14:46
13,621
first reading
Engagement
584 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.297%
avg views ÷ 13,726 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.8
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.494%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 584 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
584 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
2,242
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4h 27m
Average length
9m 14s
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 49 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
51
77.3%
👍
7
10.6%
👌
2
3.03%
💔
2
3.03%
💯
2
3.03%
🎉
1
1.52%
👏
1
1.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 584 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 584 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😍استفيدي بالعطلة
🎧 تصحيح تلاوة📖 تجويد بإتقان
ابدئي رحلتك الآن 🤍👇🏻
https://t.me/abag25/8296
🧐 تريد فهم الآيات والتدبر الحقيقي للقرآن؟ هنا البداية الجميلة 👇🏻
t.me/addlist/5xMmaj2XV2U0ZWY0
🔔 استمتع بأعذب الأناشيد الدينية 🎤📼⬇️ انضم الآن
t.me/addlist/5xMmaj2XV2U0ZWY0
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
👀 مجااانا فرصة لا تُعوَّض!
🏙 تصحيح التلاوة بإتقان
🧕معلمات مُجازات بأعلى المستويات
⏰ نظام مرن يناسب الجميع📥
t.me/AleayidunElaAllah/36724
لِمَن يريد الصلاح لأبنائه!
لا تجعلوا العودةَ إلى المدارس سببًا لانقطاع أبنائكم عن القرآن، وكأنّ كتاب الله أمرٌ زائدٌ يُقبِل عليه المرء حين يتّسع له الوقت، فإذا أقبل غيرُه كان أوّلَ ما يُستغنى عنه! ومن تأمّل أحوال الناشئة رأى أنّ كثيرًا من حفظة كتاب الله هم من المتفوّقين والأوائل في دراستهم وحياتهم.
فاغتنموا مرحلة الطفولة للبدء مبكرًا؛ فالذهن فيها أصفى، والحفظ أسرع رسوخًا قبل تزايد الأعباء. وحددوا لهم وقتًا ووردًا…
🌟 لكل من يبحث عن التغيير .. صحبة الصالحين طريقك للصلاح بهذه الخصال النفيسة 👇🏼
https://t.me/fwayiid/21438
🌤 مقاطع صباحية قصيرة للواتس😍👇🏻
t.me/addlist/5_PrCk7A6WE4YjE0
💯للدعم @Al_foursan
🍒 غراس الجنة للقرآن الكريم
@ghirasaljanahQuransound
🍒 قناة يدآ بيد لنصل إلى الجنة
@aljenan_00am
🍒 كوني جنته ️
@konygnato
🍒 أخصائية نفسية
@dohaahmed6
🍒 زاد السنن المهجورة
@zaaad3
🍒 الــذكـر طمأنـيـنـة القــلـــب ️
@Aldekr_tmanunt
🍒 قناة نور الايمان
@nor1401norquran
🍒 نور على نور
@citylights51
🍒 روائع من نور
@rawae3noor
🍒 زآد آلشـوق
@islamicph
🍒 فَتَاوَى إِسْلَامِيَّةُ وَ فَوَائِدُ دَعْوِيَّةُ
@ftaoaofa…
Showing the 12 most recent of 584 posts we hold for @GANtk5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 75 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بالقرآن 𓂆 نهتدي•°(؏ العهد مڪملين) @GANTK3 · 22,779 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
وذكر 𓂆 @GANTK1 · 34,483 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
𓂆 من سيربح المعلومة؟ @GaNtK2 · 29,619 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
المتنوعات الدّعويّة أكاديمية زين الإتقان @zainaletqaan01 · 33,293 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
الرّقية الشّرعيّة والحجامة بزين الإتقان @Academyzainaletqaan04 · 37,595 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
حقيبة السعادة @UpTeers · 20,516 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧡°°( ̨سنرحل ويبقى الأثر الطيب )°°” (@GANtk5), 13,726 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GANtk5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.