Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خير الكـــلام

Channel

خير الكـــلام

@khayyralkalam

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24,845subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001045216230
TypeChannel
Username@khayyralkalam
Description‌ 😍هُناك قلوب تحتاج كلمةً تُزيح عنها شيئاً من ثُقل رُب كلمةً ، همسه ، نصيحة ، حديث، أو آيةً #قُرآنيـــه 🌱 تُلامس ذاك القلب فـ تُزيح مافيه من حُزن . 👈ودع همومك واحزانك وانضم إلينا للتواصل بادارة القناة @Alkady
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khayyralkalam

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

24.4 average views per post against 24,845 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.098%. Across the 4,693 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,607 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.84% and 14.6%, with a median of 7.17%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured128 of 128 published in the window (128 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,125
Mature posts only0.424% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers24,845 measured 15 August 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 4,693 channels · p10 0.989% · p25 2.84% · p50 7.17% · p75 14.6% · p90 25.3%
Position in cohort0.575th percentile · 1/71 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.116% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

24,83024,90824,8695 August 2026 — 24,908 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,908 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,896 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,890 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,868 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,865 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,851 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,839 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,830 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,831 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,845 subscribers24,8455 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,818–24,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:1624,845+14
13 Aug 2026, 18:2724,831+1
12 Aug 2026, 17:3324,830-9
11 Aug 2026, 18:1224,839-12
10 Aug 2026, 16:5324,851-14
9 Aug 2026, 18:4324,865-3
8 Aug 2026, 15:4724,868-22
7 Aug 2026, 15:5524,890-6
6 Aug 2026, 18:1024,896-12
6 Aug 2026, 02:0224,908no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:4524,908first reading

Engagement

151 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.096%
avg views ÷ 24,845 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.9
141 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.762%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
141
of 151 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 141 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held151 (13 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total3,369
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,340
Videos
584
Links
1,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
360.0%
👍240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC2 viewsread 16 August 2026

💕نصائح البيت السعيد للمتزوجين💕👇 t.me/addlist/pDiVtgkdxvszM2Jk 📌دورات علمية وتأصيلية لفهم القرآن والسُنّة على منهج سلف الأمة🔽 t.me/AleayidunElaAllah/36724

16 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC2 viewsread 16 August 2026

🔒 إن كنت تعاني من إدمان الإباحية فاستمسك بهاتين العبادتين، في الرابط التالي 👇🏼 https://t.me/fwayiid/21822 💬 اقتباسات قصيرة… تلامس القلب 🖼️ صور نقية وجميلة… تليق بذوقك👇🏻 t.me/addlist/pDiVtgkdxvszM2Jk 💯للدعم @Al_foursan

16 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC1 viewsread 16 August 2026

👍 كتابتي اطلع عليها هنا❤️‍🔥 ⌛️ https://t.me/ktabatiy ⬇️ 🌼 مـمـا قِـيـلَ في 🎉💥 👈👈 وصـف النبــﷺـي🪻 https://t.me/Kitabh_X_Sorh/865 💧 ⁉️ كيف السبيل إلى صلاح القلب 👈 وتطهيره من الغل والحسد ✂️💡 https://t.me/addlist/a6s0QYiyfWtjOGI0 🗣️دعم قوائم الخليج الإسلاميّة «نهارية» تـرحـب بــ🤝ـكم @yeeeo🔴

16 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC2 viewsread 16 August 2026

📬 أسئلة في العقيدة للأطفال👇 https://t.me/osratouna1/25410?single 💡الحكمـة من خلق المـ💧ـاء 👈 بـلا لـون ولا طعـم ولا رائحـة💎 👇👇 https://t.me/addlist/a6s0QYiyfWtjOGI0 🫵أوقفوا تصوير بيوتكم وسياراتكم وأولادكم وطعامكم وفرحتكم..📵 👈 ونعم الله عليكم لسببين✌️ 🔻🔻 https://t.me/addlist/a6s0QYiyfWtjOGI0

15 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC19 viewsread 16 August 2026

‌‌‌‌‏⁧ ‌‌‌‌‏*مهما مضت أيَّـامُ عمـركَ مُرَّةً* *‏فالدَّهـــرُ بين تقـلُّبٍ وثـبـاتِ* *وكما تجرَّعتَ الهمومَ وضيقَها* *‏إنَّ ابـتـهــاجـكَ ذاتَ يـومٍ آتِ* *☝🏻 اللهمَّ صلِّ وسلم على نبينا* *محمد وعلى آله وصحبه اجمعين* ‏═══ ༻ ﷺ ༺ ═‏══

15 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC18 viewsread 16 August 2026

*سبب نفي عثمان بن عفان لأبي ذر الغفاري رضي الله عنهما* *الخلاصة أولاً:* لم يكن "نفياً" بالمعنى السياسي، بل كان *"إبعاداً اختيارياً للفتنة"* من المدينة إلى الربذة. وكان ذلك بطلب من أبي ذر نفسه وموافقة عثمان عليه، وليس عقوبة. *التفصيل:* *1. ما الذي حصل؟* في خلافة عثمان رضي الله عنه، كان أبو ذر رضي الله عنه في المدينة. وكان أبو ذر زاهداً شديداً في الدنيا، ويرى أن الأغنياء يجب أن ينفقوا كل ما زاد عن حاجتهم. وكان يقر

15 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC18 viewsread 16 August 2026

🔖 رسالة مواساة •• ﴿وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ صَبَرُوا حَتَّى تَخْرُجَ إِلَيْهِمْ لَكَانَ خَيْرًا لَهُمْ وَاللَّهُ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ﴾ اصبر .. الأشياء في وقتها أجمل. 🍀🍀

15 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC18 viewsread 16 August 2026

#تدبرات_قرآنية في قوله تعالى: { إِنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا وَمَاتُوا وَهُمْ كُفَّارٌ أُولَئِكَ عَلَيْهِمْ لَعْنَةُ اللَّهِ وَالْمَلَائِكَةِ وَالنَّاسِ أَجْمَعِينَ} التمس بعض العلماء السر في ذكر الملائكة والناس، مع أن لعنة الله كافية!؟ ✍والجواب: السر في التعبير بلعن الملائكة والناس -مع أن لعن الله يكفى-، للدلالة على أن جميع من يعلم أحواله من العوالم العلوية والسفلية يراه أهلا للعن الله ومقته، فلا يشفع له شافع ولا يرحم

15 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC18 viewsread 16 August 2026

رأى إسحاق بن عباد البصري في منامه قائلاً يقول له: أغث الملهوف! فاستيقظ وسأل: هل في جيرانه محتاج؟ فقالوا: لا ندري ثم نام فأتاه القائل ثانياً وثالثاً وقال: أتنام ولم تغث الملهوف؟! فقام وأخذ معه ثلاثمائة درهم وركب بغلته وخرج حتى وقف على باب مسجد يصلى فيه على الجنائز فدخل المسجد فوجد رجلاً يصلي فلما أحس به الرجل انصرف من صلاته فدنا منه إسحاق وقال: يا عبد الله ما الذي أخرجك في هذا الوقت وفي هذا الموضع؟ قال: الرجل ك

15 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC17 viewsread 16 August 2026

*📜 أَحَبُّ الْكَلاَم إِلَى اللهِ :* عن سمرة بن جندب رضي الله عنه قال : قال رسول الله ﷺ : *"أحبُّ الكلامِ إلى اللهِ أربعٌ :* *سبحانَ اللهِ ، والحمدُ للهِ ، ولا إله إلا اللهُ ، واللهُ أكبرُ"* > 📕صحيح مسلم (٢١٣٧)

15 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC17 viewsread 16 August 2026

سمع أعرابي قول الله تعالى: ﴿وَعَجِلتُ إِلَيكَ رَبِّ لِتَرضى﴾ فقال: «اللَّهُمَّ اغفر لعبدٍ تأخَّر في المجيء».🪴☘🕊💙

15 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC15 viewsread 16 August 2026

‏في جوف الليل تُقضَى الحوائج قال موسى بن عيسى الموصلي رحمه الله: ركبني دَيْن فأتيت بِشراً فقلتُ : قد ركبني دَيْن قال: عليكَ بجوف الليل، ومضيت إلى أحمد بن حنبل فقلتُ : ركبني دين، قال : عليك بالسَحَر التوكل للقاضي أبي يعلى ( ٦٤)

Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @khayyralkalam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,341,970 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خير الكـــلام” (@khayyralkalam), 24,845 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khayyralkalam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.