แแ internet ๐แฐแแแทแ แแแ แแ แจแตแญ แซแแแ free internet แจแแแแ แแญแณแน join แ แแแต แแ แแ แตแฝแแแน
Signed The_flash

Channel
@Fluent_English24
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
139,971subscribers
-184 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001748209641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fluent_English24 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fluent_English24 |
Education โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 139,971 | +173 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 139,798 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 139,815 | -109 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 139,924 | -221 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 140,145 | -31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 140,176 | +21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 140,155 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 20 October 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (20 October 2024 โ 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 217 |
| Reactions total | โ |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
643 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 283 | 44.0% | |
| ๐ | 171 | 26.6% | |
| ๐ | 98 | 15.2% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 32 | 4.98% | |
| ๐ฅ | 26 | 4.04% | |
| ๐ค | 11 | 1.71% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.933% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 0.933% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 0.778% | |
| โ | 2 | 0.311% | |
| ๐ค | 2 | 0.311% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.156% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 643reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
แแ internet ๐แฐแแแทแ แแแ แแ แจแตแญ แซแแแ free internet แจแแแแ แแญแณแน join แ แแแต แแ แแ แตแฝแแแน
Signed The_flash
แฅแแดแดแดแดแดแดแด แงแจ แแ แ แฅแซแแ แแแต แแแจแแ๐ฅ๐ฅ โ๏ธ แแตแ แแแแฑ 5 แฐแแฝ แจแซแญแต แฝแแแต แ แ Request to Join แซแตแญแ ๐ แจแ แแแฝแ แฅแ แ แแฅ แซแแต แแแญ แแ แแฝ?
Signed The_flash
แจแแ แจแแฝแแ แฐแ แตแ แจแแแแญแซ แแฐแ แ แแซแ แตแ แแ แจแแ แญแแ โฃ๏ธโฃ ๐๐๐ แณแญ แแแแฝแแ แแ แฅแแณแซแแแฅแ!!
Signed The_flash
แฅแแแแแ แแแ แแแตแแ แจแแจแฅแณแนแ ?
Signed petelare Stay true
โญ๏ธ แฐแแ แฐแแ แฐแแชแแฝ แ แฒแต แแจแ แจแตแแ แญแต แแแตแดแญ แแฅแทแ :: แแแแ แจแขแตแฎแตแซ แฐแแชแแฝ แ แแต แจแดแแแซแ แปแแ แฐแจแแทแ :: แแแ แแจแ แ แแ แปแแ แ แฉแ แแฐแแชแแฝ แญแฐแซแซแ แฐแฅแแ :: แตแแแ แแแฝแแ แแฅแแฝแ แฐแแแแ :: ๐ฅแปแแแ แแแแแแ ๐๐๐๐ https://t.me/English_Ethiopian/27401 https://t.me/English_Ethiopian/27401 https://t.me/English_Ethiopian/27401
Signed petelare Stay true
แจแตแแ แญแต แแแตแฐแญ แตแญแญแแ แจแดแแแซแ แปแแ แญแแแแ๐๐๐๐๐๐ https://t.me/+G3eweXnhA1xjY2Y0
Signed petelare Stay true
แแ แขแแฐแญแแต แญแแแแ๐๐
Signed The_flash
โ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธ แจแ แแ แณ แแ แแ แญแฃแแ? แแตแแ แแแแฑ 5 แฐแแฝ แจ500 แฅแญ แซแญแต แญแธแแแแข
Signed The_flash
๐๐แแ แณแ ๐๐
Signed The_flash
แแ แ แญแแต แแแ แแแแจแต แญแแแแ?๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐๐๐ โถ๏ธแจแฑแญแญ แแแ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแจแ แแชแซ แแแ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธ แจแ แแต แแแ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแจแปแญแ แแแ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแจแ แแญแ แแแ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแฐแจแณแณแญ แแแแฝ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธ แ แแแฝแ แแแแฝ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแ แญแฝแ แแแแฝ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแจแซแซ แแแแฝ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแจแแ แญ แแแแฝ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โถ๏ธแจsex แแแแฝ JOIN ๐ แญแแฉ โ แฅแแฐ แแญแซแ แแญแฆ แญแแแแ โ JOIN แญแแแแ
Signed The_flash
๐จ แ 12แญแแ แฐแแช แแจแแแฝ แจแแแแ แ แต แจแตแแ แญแต แแแตแดแญ แปแแ แแแข แถแ แจแตแญ JOIN แแแแ แแญแณแน JOIN REQUEST แแฉ ๐โโ๏ธ
Signed The_flash
แจ30 แฐแแ แ แแ แญแ แแ แจ100 แฅแญ แซแญแต แจแแซแธแแ แฅแซแ? 10+10*0+10=??
Signed The_flash
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Fluent_English24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How much has your English Improved?
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก ๐๐โ (@Fluent_English24), 139,971 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fluent_English24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.