Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال بدنسازی فیت باش 🩷💪🏼

Channel

کانال بدنسازی فیت باش 🩷💪🏼

@Fitbash21

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,136subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001332907197
TypeChannel
Username@Fitbash21
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fitbash21

Growth

3,1363,1423,1396 August 2026 — 3,142 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,142 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,139 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,136 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,135–3,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:073,136-3
9 Aug 2026, 10:013,139-3
6 Aug 2026, 16:313,142no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:483,142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7343.5%
👍7242.9%
👏127.14%
💔42.38%
🥰42.38%
👎21.19%
😢10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 8 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jan 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,860 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

خراب آنکس که آبادت نخواهد🕊 اگر روزی نبودیم از ما به نیکی یاد کنید. ما همه عمر در جنگی مداوم جنگیدیم که جنگ ما نبود

23💔4👍2👎1🥰1

1 Jan 2026, 05:57 UTC≈1,920 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨️ 2026. Either you change, or everything stays the same.

👍84🥰1

27 Dec 2025, 19:22 UTC≈1,900 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دوستان اگه مکمل اصل و به شرط آزمایشگاه میخواید برای مشاوره و خرید مکمل به ایشون مراجعه کنید تازه اگه از طرف کانال ما تشریف ببرید ۲۰درصد تخفیف به مناسبت روز مرد میگیرید ✌️🩷

3👍3🥰1

27 Dec 2025, 19:15 UTC≈1,870 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قدرت بیشتر، ریکاوری سریع‌تر، نتیجه‌ای که می‌بینی 💪 با مکمل بدنسازی ما، تمرین‌هات رو به سطح بعد ببر💪😍 ارسال سریع به تمام نقاط کشور از ما مستقیم از بندر گناوه خرید کنید بدون واسطه ، قیمت دست اول برای مشاوره و خرید به پیج پایین مراجعه کنید💪👇 @gym_parsi

👍51🥰1

23 Dec 2025, 09:18 UTC≈1,600 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#کتابخوانی #بخش_چهارم 📚 برد شونفلد اینجا خیلی شفاف توضیح میده که تنش مکانیکی فقط «سنگین زدن» نیست؛ بلکه حاصل تعامل سه چیزه: مقدار نیرو، مدت‌زمان اعمال نیرو، و طول عضله در زمان تحمل فشار. یعنی وقتی عضله در طول کشیده‌تر تحت تنش قرار می‌گیره، سیگنال آنابولیک قوی‌تری ساخته می‌شه. به همین دلیله که حرکاتی با دامنه کامل و کنترل‌شده، حتی با وزنه متوسط، می‌تونن رشد بیشتری نسبت به حرکات نیمه‌دامنه با وزنه سنگین ایجاد کنن. نکت

7👍2

23 Dec 2025, 09:16 UTC≈1,460 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ترفند مربیان حرفه‌ای دنیا 📌 اگه می‌خوای یک حرکت ساده مثل جلو بازو دمبل واقعا عضله‌ساز بشه: سرعت فاز منفی رو به ۳–۴ ثانیه برسون مکث کوتاه پایین حرکت داشته باش و فقط تا جایی وزنه بزن که فرم کاملا تمیز بمونه. این دقیقا همون چیزیه که مربیای سطح بالا بهش می‌گن «کنترل تنش»👌 @FitBash21 💪🏼🩷

4👍3

23 Dec 2025, 09:13 UTC≈1,450 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#نکته #علمی روز ❓ چرا بعضی افراد با حجم تمرین کمتر، رشد عضلانی بیشتری می‌گیرن؟ ✅ چون «کیفیت تنش مکانیکی» مهم‌تر از «تعداد حرکات و ست‌ها»ست. اگر ست‌ها به نزدیکی ناتوانی واقعی نرسن، حتی تمرین‌های شلوغ هم رشد قابل‌توجهی نمی‌دن. عضله به فشار مؤثر پاسخ می‌ده، نه به شلوغ‌کاری تمرین @FitBash21 💪🏼🩷

👍53

20 Dec 2025, 07:00 UTC≈1,580 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#کتابخوانی #بخش_سوم اگر بخوام ادامه حرف‌های برد شونفلد رو ساده و یک‌دست برات بگم، باید از اینجا شروع کنم که او عملا از همون صفحات ابتدایی کتاب می‌خواد ذهن ما رو از نگاه سطحی به تمرین آزاد کنه. شونفلد میگه رشد عضله نتیجه «خسته شدن» یا «سوزش» نیست، بلکه نتیجه پیامیه که ما با تمرین به عضله می‌فرستیم. این پیام وقتی قوی و واضح می‌شه که تنش مکانیکی واقعی به فیبر وارد بشه. یعنی عضله مجبور بشه در برابر یک مقاومت معنادار، در

👍53

16 Dec 2025, 09:05 UTC≈1,410 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سوال طبق متن کتاب انتخاب شده دقت کنید✌️

6

16 Dec 2025, 09:04 UTC≈1,500 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

چرا یک ست با وزنه سنگین اما اجرای شتاب‌دار می‌تواند محرک هایپرتروفی ضعیف‌تری نسبت به یک ست سبک‌تر ولی کنترل‌شده باشد؟

  1. چون وزنه‌های سنگین بیشتر سیستم قلبی–عروقی را درگیر می‌کنند18%
  2. چون شتاب گرفتن وزنه باعث کاهش زمان تحت تنش مؤثر روی فیبرهای فعال می‌شود52%
  3. چون تمرین سبک‌تر آسیب عضلانی بیشتری ایجاد می کند2%
  4. چون دامنه حرکتی در وزنه‌های سنگین همیشه ناقص است28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Dec 2025, 08:59 UTC≈1,430 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📘 #کتاب‌خوانی #بخش_دوم بعد از معرفی سه مکانیسم اصلی رشد عضله، شونفلد وارد یک نکته بنیادی می‌شود: همهٔ تنش‌های مکانیکی اثر یکسانی ندارند. عضله صرفاً به جابه‌جایی وزنه پاسخ نمی‌دهد، بلکه به میزان فشاری که واقعاً روی فیبرهای فعال در دامنهٔ مؤثر حرکت وارد می‌شود واکنش نشان می‌دهد. به همین دلیل است که یک حرکت سنگین اما شتاب‌دار می‌تواند از نظر هایپرتروفی ضعیف‌تر از یک حرکت سبک‌تر اما کاملاً کنترل‌شده باشد. او توضیح می‌د

👏71👎1

16 Dec 2025, 08:52 UTC≈1,170 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#نکته_روز «عضله‌ها به وزنه عادت می‌کنند، اما به استرس جدید نه.» 📌 تنوع هوشمند در شدت، تکرار و استراحت، کلید پیشرفت پایدار است. 🩷فیت باش💪🏼

👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Fitbash21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Dec 2025, 09:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz117 voters

چرا یک ست با وزنه سنگین اما اجرای شتاب‌دار می‌تواند محرک هایپرتروفی ضعیف‌تری نسبت به یک ست سبک‌تر ولی کنترل‌شده باشد؟

  1. چون وزنه‌های سنگین بیشتر سیستم قلبی–عروقی را درگیر می‌کنند18%
  2. چون شتاب گرفتن وزنه باعث کاهش زمان تحت تنش مؤثر روی فیبرهای فعال می‌شود52%
  3. چون تمرین سبک‌تر آسیب عضلانی بیشتری ایجاد می کند2%
  4. چون دامنه حرکتی در وزنه‌های سنگین همیشه ناقص است28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 8 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 566,139 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال بدنسازی فیت باش 🩷💪🏼” (@Fitbash21), 3,136 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fitbash21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.