Channel
@FirstBookTG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,355subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001190798691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FirstBookTG |
| Description | Новые книги каждый день! Размещение рекламы - @alexx2017 Уважаемые правообладатели, на канале нет ваших книг! Просьба, быть внимательными и не отправлять жалобы на бесплатную рекламу ваших произведений в форме рецензий и аннотаций. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FirstBookTG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 15,355 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 15,354 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 15,357 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 15,365 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 15,371 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 15,370 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 15,370 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (7 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,614 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 53.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 13.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤬 Опять всех слили... Сегодня @ruschan подготовили для вас самый масштабный слив закрытых каналов. Мы не знаем, как долго будут работать эти ссылки, поэтому подпишитесь прямо сейчас, чтобы точно успеть 👇 💅 ⇆ Макияж в MAX 🦋 ⇆ Твоё Саморазвитие! 💟 ⇆ Психология счастья! 🌈 ⇆ Мотивация и вдохновение! 😂 ⇆ Убойный Юмор 👨🏫 ⇆ Удалёнка Профессии Обучение 🤖 ⇆ Нейросети и ИИ 👳♂️ ⇆ Слова Мудрости 🍎 ⇆ Дача. Сад. Растени…
По-настоящему сильным до тех пор не будешь, пока не научишься видеть во всем смешную сторону. Он знает: надо смеяться над тем, что тебя мучит, иначе не сохранишь равновесия, иначе мир сведет тебя с ума. ©️Кен Кизи
Иногда вдруг отчетливо понимаешь, что жизнь проходит. И довольно быстро. Люди смешны. Вот если я потерял два рубля — я огорчусь. А каждую секунду мы теряем секунду жизни. И ничего, не замечаем. ©️Эдвард Радзинский
Не надо забывать, какое большое значение имеют в жизни мелочи. ©️Эрих Мария Ремарк
Ею всё больше овладевало какое-то странное тоскливое ощущение потерянного времени, жизни, проходящей мимо, хотелось бежать из дома, уехать куда-нибудь очень далеко, чтобы путешествовать по всему миру и вершить великие дела. Она точно не знала, что именно ей хотелось совершить, но это должно было быть что-то великое, мрачное и ужасно сложное. ©️Донна Тартт "Маленький друг"
Нужно жить всегда влюбленным во что-нибудь недоступное тебе. Человек становится выше ростом от того, что тянется вверх. ©️Максим Горький
Плохие вещи будут происходить всегда. Но чудо состоит в том, что свет всегда побеждает тьму. Каждый раз. Ты можешь поставить свечку в темноте, но не можешь воткнуть темноту в свет… ©️Джоди Пиколт
🔥2
Любая зависимость от других очень хрупка, потому что то, что другие могут дать, они же и отберут. Только то, что было вашим с самого начала, останется вашим до конца. ©️Нисаргадатта Махарадж
Любовь зарождается в беседе души с душой. ©️Уильям Шекспир
Человек всегда чувствует себя дома в своем прошлом. ©️Владимир Набоков
Неужели же невозможно, чтобы – оба, сильно, друг друга, без борьбы, без тактики, без уловок – открыто, счастливо? ©️Михаил Веллер "Разбиватель сердец"
Когда мы встречаем особенного человека, мы отдаем ему все свое время, он поглощает все наши мысли, и всякий раз нам приходится его терять... ©️Сесилия Ахерн
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @FirstBookTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 274,110 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 51 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Первый Книжный | Бестселлеры” (@FirstBookTG), 15,355 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FirstBookTG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.