Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фиолетовая башня

@Fioletovaya_bashnya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

297subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002268420043
TypeChannel
Username@Fioletovaya_bashnya
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fioletovaya_bashnya

Growth

297298297.56 August 2026 — 298 subscribers6 August 2026 — 298 subscribers15 August 2026 — 297 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 297–298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:47297-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:33298no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:52298first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 11 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

420 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24458.1%
🔥6415.2%
custom 5219826041484242315337.86%
❤‍🔥266.19%
custom 5273836569491414574122.86%
custom 5449618663109851826122.86%
🙏112.62%
👍92.14%
custom 543145831731668509781.90%
custom 527619560604854595910.238%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fioletovaya_bashnya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 March 2026 to 18 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 13:07 UTC306 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @clandestin_v

Неореализм и его трактовки Любопытно, что несмотря на то, что неореализм понимался Базеном или Делезом вполне в модернистском ключе, никакая любовь к делезовским текстам не заставила большинство киноведов пересмотреть свое отношение к его [неореализма]«объективистским» трактовкам. Традиционное суждение по поводу неореалистического кино на удивление хрестоматийно. Связано ли этом с избирательным чтением? С привычкой

9custom 54314583173166850978custom 52738365694914145741

4 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC403 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мы завершаем этот насыщенный сезон просмотром и обсуждением фильма Джармуша «Отец мать сестра брат» (2025). В этом учебном году мы вновь стали встречаться. Начав в обычной (неудобной) аудитории, мы переехали в конце 25 года в кинозал института с качественным оборудованием, большим экраном и удобными сиденьями. Очень надеюсь, что в дальнейшем мы превратим «Башню» в лабораторию – открытое пространство, коллективное дей

15custom 52198260414842423154custom 52738365694914145743🔥2❤‍🔥1🙏1

24 May 2026, 09:45 UTC395 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Генри Пич Робинсон. Угасание, 1858.

15🔥8🙏2❤‍🔥1

20 May 2026, 16:30 UTC531 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Перед летом предлагаю в очередной раз погрузиться в экранный мир Романа Михайлова. В эту субботу буду рад всех видеть на показе «Отпуска в октябре» (2023) в Институте кино и телевидения. Про этот фильм я писал раньше. Теперь же нам следует сделать шаг вперед (в том числе в связи с выбранной на весну темой). Для теории наиболее интересным феноменом является метакинематограф (кино о кино). В этом контексте фильм Михай

26custom 52198260414842423157🔥4

30 Apr 2026, 09:03 UTC537 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Генри Пич Робинсон. Она никогда не рассказывала о своей любви, 1857.

❤‍🔥205🙏3🔥1

26 Apr 2026, 16:04 UTC851 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Публикую текст своего доклада на конференции 16.04.26. Из предуведомления лишь добавлю, что в тексте сохраняется риторический стиль устной речи перед публикой. В остальном текст говорит сам за себя. #Башня_тексты https://telegra.ph/V-ozhidanii-krizisa-sverhnovoe-i-paranoidalnoe-v-sovremennom-kinematografe-04-26

27🔥4custom 52198260414842423154👍3

21 Apr 2026, 10:00 UTC505 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Альберт Серра. Против смысла: кино как акт сопротивления https://vkvideo.ru/video-217041599_456239534?t=45m4s #Башня_рекомендации

13🔥2🙏2

17 Apr 2026, 20:30 UTC645 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Единственно возможная аннотация к завтрашнему показу:

17custom 54496186631098518268👍5custom 52738365694914145742🔥1🙏1

17 Apr 2026, 07:00 UTC506 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Приглашаю завтра посмотреть "Опавшие листья" (2023) Аки Каурисмяки в Институте кино и телевидения. Адрес: г. Санкт-Петербург, ул. Правды, д. 13, кинозал 1435 (4-й этаж по главной лестнице). Дата и время: 18 апреля 2026 г., 17:00. Бесплатно. Всех очень жду! 🙏 #Башня_анонсы Если Вы НЕ являетесь студентом или сотрудником института, то для прохода просим Вас оставить заранее (сегодня или завтра) заявку в системе оформ

27custom 52198260414842423154custom 54496186631098518263custom 52738365694914145741custom 52761956060485459591

27 Mar 2026, 16:03 UTC469 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Считаю нужным добавить несколько слов от себя к анонсу завтрашней встречи (см. пост выше). Годар, наверное, больше других воспринял фразу Базена о том, что «кино еще не изобретено». В теории кино после войны произошел водораздел, когда по-новому был поставлен вопрос о реализме в кинематографе. Скажем, меняется представление об актере, который не только и не столько выполняет репрезентативную функцию в моменте игры (

14❤‍🔥4custom 52738365694914145742

25 Mar 2026, 10:25 UTC446 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @studiolegkospbPhoto

А пока…) Мы приглашаем на камерную уникальную встречу - 28 марта состоится показ второго фильма из авторского мини-цикла кинопоказов, объединенных темой «Расщепление субъекта в образе». Доцент кафедры драматургии и киноведения Санкт-Петербургского института кино и телевидения, лектор и киновед Георгий Мелентьев представит фильм «На последнем дыхании» (1960 г.) Ж.-Л. Годара. Уникальный в своем роде фильм когда-то бы

12custom 52198260414842423154🔥3

20 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC478 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В принципе неожиданно, что пишу про «Крик 7», но в этом ужасно скучном фильме обнаруживается очень важный момент (который, на самом деле, может быть обнаружен и в части, скажем, пятой, шестой или, наверняка, будущей восьмой). Герои фильма оказываются в дурной бесконечности повторения одного и того же: от фильма к фильму они свидетели или жертвы убийств маньяка. Фигура повторения начинает выходить за рамки цитаты, омм

20🔥18custom 52198260414842423158

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Fioletovaya_bashnya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 972,475 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фиолетовая башня” (@Fioletovaya_bashnya), 297 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fioletovaya_bashnya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.