Trent Alexander-Arnold's defensive stats vs. Chelsea: ■ 5 duels won ■ 4 clearances ■ 4/4 tackles won ■ 1 block ■ 10 defensive actions No player on the pitch won more duels, tackles or made more clearances ⚔
❤11👍2

Channel
@FifaWorldCap22
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
32,050subscribers
-184 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001545265903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FifaWorldCap22 |
| Description | Football betting is the act of predicting outcomes in football matches. This can include guessing the winner, scoreline, or other events within the game. Bettors place wagers on these telderi-082ca844-fb4c-4b07-9e27-736424a4e098 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FifaWorldCap22 |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @FifaWorldCap22/1391 · this entry20 Oct 2024, 07:30 UTC | @FiFaPrivilegeClub/61420 Oct 2024, 07:31 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @FifaWorldCap22/1392 · this entry20 Oct 2024, 07:30 UTC | @FiFaPrivilegeClub/61520 Oct 2024, 07:31 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @FifaWorldCap22/1395 · this entry20 Oct 2024, 07:30 UTC | @FiFaPrivilegeClub/61820 Oct 2024, 07:31 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @FifaWorldCap22/1396 · this entry20 Oct 2024, 07:30 UTC | @FiFaPrivilegeClub/61920 Oct 2024, 07:31 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @FifaWorldCap22/1398 · this entry21 Oct 2024, 08:00 UTC | @FiFaPrivilegeClub/62121 Oct 2024, 08:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @FifaWorldCap22/1407 · this entry21 Oct 2024, 08:00 UTC | @FiFaPrivilegeClub/62421 Oct 2024, 08:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @FiFaPrivilegeClub | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 October 2024 to 21 October 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @FifaWorldCap22 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 32,050 | -48 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 32,098 | -32 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 32,130 | -35 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 32,165 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 32,197 | -29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 32,226 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 32,234 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
183 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 51.4% | |
| 👍 | 70 | 38.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.28% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 2.73% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 2.19% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 21 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Trent Alexander-Arnold's defensive stats vs. Chelsea: ■ 5 duels won ■ 4 clearances ■ 4/4 tackles won ■ 1 block ■ 10 defensive actions No player on the pitch won more duels, tackles or made more clearances ⚔
❤11👍2
⏱️ 𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗙 𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗘: 🏴 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐎𝐎𝐋 1 - 0 𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐒𝐄𝐀 🏴
❤8
Drop your prediction?👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Line-ups! 📋 #LIVCHE 🏴 🏴 Liverpool — Kelleher; Alexander-Arnold, Konaté, van Dijk(C), Robertson; Jones, Gravenberch, Szoboszlai; Mohamed Salah, Diogo Jota, Gakpo. Chelsea — Sánchez; James(C), Adarabioyo, Colwill, Gusto; Caicedo, Lavia; Madueke, Palmer, Sancho; Jackson.
❤2
GOAL: 𝐒𝐀𝐋𝐀𝐇 (P) 🏴 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐎𝐎𝐋 1 - 0 𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐒𝐄𝐀 🏴
❤2
GOAL: JACKSON 🏴 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐎𝐎𝐋 1 - 1𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐒𝐄𝐀 🏴
GOAL: JONES 🏴 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐎𝐎𝐋 2 - 1𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐒𝐄𝐀 🏴
⏱️ 𝗙𝗨𝗟𝗟 𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗘: 🏴 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐎𝐎𝐋 2 - 1 𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐒𝐄𝐀 🏴
🔥5❤2
🚨 This year, the Ballon d’Or winner won’t be interviewed by France Football before the ceremony, but after 👀 This means the winner won’t know they’ve won until the envelope is opened, avoiding last year’s scenario where Lionel Messi knew he had won the award hours before .
👍41❤37👏2🙏1
Liverpool under Arne Slot: ■ 11 games ■ 10 wins ■ 1 loss ■ 1st in the Premier League ■ 2/2 wins in the Champions League ■ Beat Man United, AC Milan and Chelsea What a start 💪
❤20❤🔥6👍5👎2
Mo Salah's goalscoring record (PL only) vs. the big six: Man United: 12 goals, 6 assists Arsenal: 10 goals, 2 assists Spurs: 9 goals, 2 assists Man City: 7 goals, 4 assists Chelsea: 5 goals, 3 assists 60 goal contributions and counting 🤯
👍16❤6🙏1
🗣️ "You are on the shortlist for the Ballon d'Or, do you believe you can win?" Cole Palmer: "It's a surprise to be recognised at this level so early in my career. It's a great honour and it would be great to win. If I work hard, I believe I can win."
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @FifaWorldCap22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Drop your prediction?👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 21 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 976,275 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FIFA World Cup 2022” (@FifaWorldCap22), 32,050 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FifaWorldCap22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.