Channel
@Fabula
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001471952601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fabula |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fabula |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ParaGnosti | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (11–0) |
| @RieducazioneCivica | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9–0) |
| @Mondopoli | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @assembleedelpopolo. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:20 | 68 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 67 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 66 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 67 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 67 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
MUOS di Niscemi e Haarp HAARP è l'acronimo di High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (Programma di ricerca aurorale attiva ad alta frequenza). Ascolta il video Click here🖲️ 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 https://t.me/+SovuPtlk0IQxMTQ0
Signed Berto
‼️ALTRO CHE "FAKE NEWS"‼️ 😱ERA ADDIRITTURA PEGGIO😱 Ancora una volta il tempo è stato galantuomo... E ancora una volta noi "complottisti" avevamo ragione! E avevamo ragione a sentire una certa "puzza" sulla "grazia preventiva" data in sordina da Biden ad Antony Fauci poco prima di lasciare la Casa Bianca. 💡 Nel 2021 Fauci ha vinto il premio Dan David Prize di un milione $ istituito dall'omonima fondazione e gesti…
Signed Berto
IA - Intelligenza Artificiale - profitto con il turbo - la macchina dei super ricchi per creare soldi e potere ➜ COM’È possibile che dal 2020 ad oggi, vari miliardari sono riusciti ad aumentare i loro patrimoni dell'80%? ➜ Mentre i redditi del cittadino medio sono in costante calo? ➜ C'è un modo per poter porre fine alle attività di questi profittatori parassiti? ✅ Segnala ORA su vetopedia.org i profitti indebiti d…
Signed Berto
Il terremoto del Patto di Maometto Stiamo assistendo al crollo definitivo dei vecchi equilibri in Medio Oriente. Il progressivo disimpegno americano ha lasciato un vuoto enorme nel Golfo, e quattro giganti sunniti lo hanno appena riempito con un'alleanza autonoma, armata e nucleare ch~ Fonte: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1332933438940797
Signed Berto
Gli scribacchini di regime ci informano che in Veneto, ad agosto, è apparsa la nebbia calda Sono i maestri degli ossimori, quelli della lucida follia. Qui i comici involontari dei media si dividono fra quelli del "è sempre successo" (CIT. morte improvvisa) e la fazione del "fenomeno raro, ma tutto sommato ci sta". Con la geoingegneria clandestina quest' anno hanno esagerato. Fino a Giugno oscuramento reiterato del…
Signed Berto
😎😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 Siete finalmente FOTTUTI!!!! Click here🖲️ 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 https://t.me/+SovuPtlk0IQxMTQ0
Signed Berto
Click here🖲️ 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 https://t.me/+SovuPtlk0IQxMTQ0
Signed Berto
ELEZIONI: LA PIÙ GRANDE TRUFFA I politici non si preoccupano di vincere le elezioni, IL potere e uno soli e comanda tutti a destra, sinistra, centro. L’unica preoccupazione del potere é ottenere almeno il 60% di cittadini che crepano ancora al sistema e vadano a votare, non importa chi. SOTTO LA SOGLIA DEL 60% INIZIEREBBERO I GUAI PER I POLITICI E IL POTERE OCCULTO NON AVREBBE ALCUNA LEGITTIMAZIONE PER QUESTO MOT…
Signed Berto
⚠️ Rothschild - L'impero del Male ⚠️ ‼️IL NEMICO N°1 DELL'UMANITÀ‼️ Il cognome originale era Bauer (contadino) troppo umile per chi aveva la potenza economica di finanziare guerre, Stati e Re per un proprio tornaconto, fu quindi cambiato in Rothschild (ScudoRosso). La più grande famiglia di criminali al mondo spiegata in italiano coi disegnini. Come hanno fatto per riuscire a possedere un patrimonio stimato tra i …
Signed Berto
Il Crollo dell'argento – un colpo da 100 miliardi di dollari della mafia finanziaria Dopo che il prezzo dell'argento era rimasto a lungo a bassi livelli, è letteralmente esploso a partire dalla metà del 2025. L'argento ha raggiunto, a gennaio, un massimo storico. Tuttavia, già il giorno successivo si è verificato il più grave crollo, dal 2013, dei prezzi sui mercati dei metalli preziosi. Come è potuto accadere? Tutt…
Signed Berto
Le strutture mafiose delle autorità di controllo EMA, FDA e CDC Vi fidate ancora delle autorità dedite alla tutela della salute pubblica? Credete che il controllo e l’autorizzazione per l’immissione in commercio dei farmaci siano in mano a degli uffici competenti con un senso di responsabilità a beneficio dei pazienti? In questo servizio mettiamo l’EMA, la FDA e il CDC sotto la lente d’ingrandimento:🕵️♂️ confrontat…
Signed Berto
Ricerche investigative rivelano il meccanismo dei mass media allineati! 🔎 «Ogni giorno il mondo viene inondato di notizie: migliaia di titoli danno l’impressione che ci sia una copertura mediatica vasta e variata, grazie alla quale chiunque possa formarsi una propria opinione. Su tanti temi cruciali, invece, i media sembrano essere sempre d’accordo, e sempre più persone si chiedono come ciò sia possibile. HD-Video,…
Signed Berto
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Fabula. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fabula” (@Fabula), 68 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fabula.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.