Channel

Ethnogenesis of the Caucasus

@Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

324subscribers

+105 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003921495652
Type	Channel
Username	@Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus
Created	Between 1 April 2026 and 22 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	16 September 2026
Measurements held	7
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–340 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
16 Sept 2026, 08:21	324	+21
8 Sept 2026, 01:17	303	+27
29 Aug 2026, 17:14	276	+8
23 Aug 2026, 07:55	268	+20
15 Aug 2026, 17:07	248	+29
7 Aug 2026, 03:18	219	no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:01	219	first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	56	65.1%
❤	22	25.6%
🔥	2	2.33%
🤔	2	2.33%
👏	1	1.16%
🗿	1	1.16%
🤓	1	1.16%
🥰	1	1.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC275 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

Карта Западной Азии на 3500й год до нашей эры. Расцвет и падение Урука. Автор карты: Khlav. Карта в высоком разрешении, комментарии к ней и дополнительные метериалы от автора приложены в комментариях. Данная карта демонстрирует распространение различных археологических культур, примерно, на 3500й год до нашей эры. Несмотря на наличие некоторых спорных моментов, данная карта будет полезна, интересующимся доисториче…

👍6❤2

Signed Я Мы

3 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC204 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

Как могли выглядеть восточноевропейские охотники-собиратели, связанные с ранними индоевропейцами. Авторы реконструкции: Ancestral Whispers. Сегодня известно, что, скорее всего, индоевропейские(ИЕ) языки были распространены на территориях от Кавказа до нижней Волги, образуя Кавказо-Нижне-Волжскуя(CLV) клину, после чего их носители мигрируют оттуда в днепро-донской регион, где возникает Среднестоговская культура, а з…

👍7

Signed Я Мы

1 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC61 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Forwarded from @Genealogy_of_the_LaksFile

если кому то еще нужно древо 1842 с отмеченными процентами по народам. актуальная версия всегда будет лежать в предикторе по кнопке "🌳 J-Z1842 clade tree" https://ypredictor.github.io/#clade

👍8

Signed Я Мы

1 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC150 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Перевод англоязычных цитат о прародине тюрков из научной работы, приведённых в посте выше.👆👆👆 ... Тюркские народы имеют общего предка с населением Южной Сибири и Монголии, что подтверждает гипотезу об их происхождении из этого региона. ... Современные генетические данные недостаточны для точного определения времени и места возникновения прототюркского языка, однако очевидно, что он, вероятно, возник где-то в Северо…

👍4🥰1

Signed Я Мы

1 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

О прото-тюркской прародине. Что нам говорит лингвистика? PT - Proto-Turkic ... Turkic peoples shared their ancestry with populations from southern Siberia and Mongolia, supporting the hypothesis that they originated there. ... current genetic evidence is not adequate to track the exact time and location for the origin of the PT lang., it is clear that it probably originated somewhere in northeastern Asia given the …

👍4

Signed Я Мы

31 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC216 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

Загадка появление дольменов на Северо-западном Кавказе. Археология. Самым масштабным явлением на Кавказе, связанным с традицией создания дольменов, является Дольменная культура Северо-западного Кавказа, появившаяся там, судя по датировкам самых ранних дольменов, на поздних этапах существования Майкопской культуры(~ конец 4го тысячелетия до н. э. - начало 3го) и продолжившая своё существование после исчезновения втор…

👍8❤5

Signed Я Мы

30 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC69 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Forwarded from @kurgantisttPhoto

Genetics of the English by era @steppelander

👍5

Signed Я Мы

29 Jul 2026, 19:18 UTC376 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возможные источники нахско-дагестанских языков. Обобщённо все варианты происхождения нахско-дагестанских языков можно свести к двум источникам: местные кавказские охотники-собиратели или, мигрировавшие с юга, неолитические популяции. В данном материале будут рассмотрены аргументы в пользу этих теорий и их проблемы. 1. Аргументы в пользу южных неолитическихпопуляций как изначальных носителей языка. Вероятно, основн…

👍5❤3🤔2👏1🤓1

Signed Я Мы

27 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC356 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Видео-обзор двух научных работ, посвящённых генетической истории ранних индоевропейцев. В данном видео обозреваются две научные работы: The genetic origins of Indo-Europeans и A genomic history of North Pontic Region from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age. Эти работы проливают свет на сложные процессы, формировавшие генетическое происхождение ранних индоевропейцев, чей этногенез оказался сложнее, чем это предполагало…

❤4👍2

Signed Я Мы

23 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,820 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Археологические следы миграциграций индоевропейцев Ямного археологического комплекса в Дагестан и дальше на Южный Кавказ. В прибрежном Дагестане имеются курганы, датирующиеся концом третьего тысячелетия до нашей эры, близ села Утамыш. Интересной особенностью данных курганов является наличие в одном из них деревянного сруба, внутри которого была телега с саркофагом. Данный вид захоронения был не свойственен более ран…

❤8🔥2

Signed Я Мы

22 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC172 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

Генетическая связь между тюркскими и монгольскими народами обусловлена общим происхождением от древних северо-восточных азиатов (ANA), также известной как «амурский компонент». 🔹 Прото-монголы генетически ближе к земледельцам бассейна Западной Ляохе. 🔹 Прото-тюрки генетически ближе к носителям культуры плиточных могил (Slab-Grave). Подобно тому, как современные анатолийские турки и греки происходят от популяции A…

👍7🗿1

Signed Я Мы

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Caucasus DNA and more 🏔️
@CaucasusDNA · 5677 posts Armenian DNA 🇦🇲
@ArmDNAA · 4,5341 post Hereditas
@HereditasGenetics · 8881 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Turkic DNA
@turkicdna · 892 posts Генеалогия лакцев
@Genealogy_of_the_Laks · 9061 post Kurgantist et al.
@kurgantistt · 2301 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Caucasus DNA and more 🏔️
@CaucasusDNA · 5677 posts Armenian DNA 🇦🇲
@ArmDNAA · 4,5342 posts Hereditas
@HereditasGenetics · 8882 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Armenian DNA 🇦🇲
@ArmDNAA · 4,5342 posts Аскерхан про Дагестан
@AskerkhanProDagestan · 8211 post Археология, история, генетика - исследования
@Baboon_archaeology_history_genet · 2861 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ethnogenesis of the Caucasus” (@Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus), 324 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.