Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Caucasus DNA and more 🏔️

Channel

Caucasus DNA and more 🏔️

@CaucasusDNA

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

567subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001984209204
TypeChannel
Username@CaucasusDNA
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CaucasusDNA

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

552567559.57 August 2026 — 552 subscribers8 August 2026 — 552 subscribers16 August 2026 — 558 subscribers31 August 2026 — 562 subscribers8 September 2026 — 566 subscribers17 September 2026 — 567 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 550–569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:20567+1
8 Sept 2026, 20:59566+4
31 Aug 2026, 05:19562+4
16 Aug 2026, 16:06558+6
8 Aug 2026, 03:36552no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:11552first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3664.3%
❤916.1%
💯23.57%
😁23.57%
🤡23.57%
🌚11.79%
👎11.79%
💊11.79%
🤣11.79%
🤮11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC43 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus

Теории об исконном кавказском происхождении нахско-дагестанских языков на основе некоторых генетических, археологических и лингвистических данных и о некоторых процессах этногенеза нахов в свете работы одного из ведущих специалистов по нахско-дагестанским языкам, Джоанны Николс(файл с работой в комментариях). В данном материале изложена лишь одна из возможных теорий происхождения нахско-дагестанских языков. Для нача…

👍4🌚1🤡1

Signed Я Мы

5 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC62 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ethnogenesis_of_CaucasusPhoto

Карта Западной Азии на 3500й год до нашей эры. Расцвет и падение Урука. Автор карты: Khlav. Карта в высоком разрешении, комментарии к ней и дополнительные метериалы от автора приложены в комментариях. Данная карта демонстрирует распространение различных археологических культур, примерно, на 3500й год до нашей эры. Несмотря на наличие некоторых спорных моментов, данная карта будет полезна, интересующимся доисториче…

👍5👎1

Signed Я Мы

3 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ethnogenesis_of_CaucasusPhoto

Как могли выглядеть восточноевропейские охотники-собиратели, связанные с ранними индоевропейцами. Авторы реконструкции Ancestral Whispers. Сегодня известно, что, скорее всего, индоевропейские(ИЕ) языки были распространены на территориях от Кавказа до нижней Волги, образуя Кавказо-Нижне-Волжскуя(CLV) клину, после чего их носители мигрируют оттуда в днепро-донской регион, где возникает Среднестоговская культура, а за…

👍2

Signed Я Мы

1 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Genealogy_of_the_LaksFile

если кому то еще нужно древо 1842 с отмеченными процентами по народам. актуальная версия всегда будет лежать в предикторе по кнопке "🌳 J-Z1842 clade tree" https://ypredictor.github.io/#clade

👍4

Signed Я Мы

1 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC102 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

О прото-тюркской прародине. Что нам говорит лингвистика? PT - Proto-Turkic ... Turkic peoples shared their ancestry with populations from southern Siberia and Mongolia, supporting the hypothesis that they originated there. ... current genetic evidence is not adequate to track the exact time and location for the origin of the PT lang., it is clear that it probably originated somewhere in northeastern Asia given the …

❤8💯2💊1😁1

Signed Я Мы

31 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ethnogenesis_of_CaucasusPhoto

Загадка появление дольменов на Северо-западном Кавказе. Археология. Самым масштабным явлением на Кавказе, связанным с традицией создания дольменов является Дольменная культура Северо-западного Кавказа, появившаяся там, судя по датировкам самых ранних дольменов, на поздних этапах существования Майкопской культуры(~ конец 4го тысячелетия до н. э. - начало 3го) и продолжившая своё существование после исчезновения второ…

👍1

Signed Я Мы

30 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC101 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus

Возможные источники нахско-дагестанских языков. Обобщённо все варианты происхождения нахско-дагестанских языков можно свести к двум источникам: местные кавказские охотники-собиратели или, мигрировавшие с юга, неолитические популяции. В данном материале будут рассмотрены аргументы в пользу этих теорий и их проблемы. 1. Аргументы в пользу южных неолитическихпопуляций как изначальных носителей языка. Вероятно, основн…

👍5🤡1🤣1🤮1

Signed Я Мы

30 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kurgantisttPhoto

Genetics of the English by era @steppelander

👍2

Signed Я Мы

27 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus

Видео-обзор двух научных работ, посвящённых генетической истории ранних индоевропейцев. В данном видео обозреваются две научные работы: The genetic origins of Indo-Europeans и A genomic history of North Pontic Region from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age. Эти работы проливают свет на сложные процессы, формировавшие генетическое происхождение ранних индоевропейцев, чей этногенез оказался сложнее, чем это предполагало…

👍3

Signed Я Мы

23 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC203 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ethnogenesis_of_Caucasus

Археологические следы миграциграций индоевропейцев Ямного археологического комплекса в Дагестан и дальше на юг. В прибрежном Дагестане имеются курганы, датирующиеся концом третьего тысячелетия до нашей эры, близ села Утамыш. Интересной особенностью данных курганов является наличие в одном из них деревянного сруба, внутри которого была телега с саркофагом. Данный вид захоронения был не свойственен более ранней Кура-А…

👍4❤1😁1

Signed Я Мы

22 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

Генетическая связь между тюркскими и монгольскими народами обусловлена ​​общим происхождением от древних северо-восточных азиатов (ANA), также известной как «амурский компонент». 🔹 Прото-монголы генетически ближе к земледельцам бассейна Западной Ляохе. 🔹 Прото-тюрки генетически ближе к носителям культуры плиточных могил (Slab-Grave). Подобно тому, как современные анатолийские турки и греки происходят от популяции A…

👍6

Signed Я Мы

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @CaucasusDNA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Genotek
@genotek · 22,303
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Caucasus DNA and more 🏔️” (@CaucasusDNA), 567 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CaucasusDNA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.